These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17479392)

  • 1. Assessing equivalence of two assays using sensitivity and specificity.
    Quiroz J; Burdick RK
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(3):433-43. PubMed ID: 17479392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of equivalence using a concordance correlation coefficient in a repeated measurements design.
    Quiroz J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(6):913-28. PubMed ID: 16279351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of individual agreements with repeated measurements based on generalized confidence intervals.
    Quiroz J; Burdick RK
    J Biopharm Stat; 2009; 19(2):345-59. PubMed ID: 19212885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Statistical inference for the within-device precision of quantitative measurements in assay validation.
    Liu JP; Lu LT; Liao CT
    J Biopharm Stat; 2009 Sep; 19(5):763-78. PubMed ID: 20183442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Correlation coefficient inference on censored bioassay data.
    Li L; Wang WW; Chan IS
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(3):501-12. PubMed ID: 15920894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Determining the error of dose estimates and minimum and maximum acceptable concentrations from assays with nonlinear dose-response curves.
    Gottschalk PG; Dunn JR
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2005 Dec; 80(3):204-15. PubMed ID: 16256244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating qualitative assays using sensitivity and specificity.
    Zhong B
    J Biopharm Stat; 2002 Nov; 12(4):409-24. PubMed ID: 12477066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improved confidence intervals for the sensitivity at a fixed level of specificity of a continuous-scale diagnostic test.
    Zhou XH; Qin G
    Stat Med; 2005 Feb; 24(3):465-77. PubMed ID: 15635678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Equivalence testing for parallelism in the four-parameter logistic model.
    Jonkman JN; Sidik K
    J Biopharm Stat; 2009 Sep; 19(5):818-37. PubMed ID: 20183446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of several methods for analyzing data from thorough QT studies.
    Tian H; Qiao W; Natarajan J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 May; 20(3):632-40. PubMed ID: 20358441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Two confidence interval approaches on the dependability coefficient in a two-factor crossed design.
    Ting N; Cappelleri JC; Bushmakin AG
    J Biopharm Stat; 2009 Jul; 19(4):610-24. PubMed ID: 20183429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sample size determination for assessing equivalence based on proportion ratio under a randomized trial with non-compliance and missing outcomes.
    Lui KJ; Chang KC
    Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(1):47-67. PubMed ID: 17708514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Parametric and non-parametric prediction intervals based phase II control charts for repeated bioassay data.
    Hothorn LA; Gerhard D; Hofmann M
    Biologicals; 2009 Oct; 37(5):323-30. PubMed ID: 19647449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. About the background distribution in MR data: a local variance study.
    Aja-Fernández S; Vegas-Sánchez-Ferrero G; Tristán-Vega A
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jun; 28(5):739-52. PubMed ID: 20456894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inferences on the mean of zero-inflated lognormal data: the generalized variable approach.
    Tian L
    Stat Med; 2005 Oct; 24(20):3223-32. PubMed ID: 16189811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Two-sided tolerance intervals for balanced and unbalanced random effects models.
    Hoffman D; Kringle R
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(2):283-93. PubMed ID: 15796296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reconstruction of 2D PET data with Monte Carlo generated system matrix for generalized natural pixels.
    Vandenberghe S; Staelens S; Byrne CL; Soares EJ; Lemahieu I; Glick SJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jun; 51(12):3105-25. PubMed ID: 16757866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The homogenetic estimate for the variance of survival rate.
    Zhao G
    Stat Med; 1996 Jan; 15(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 8614745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How to account for uncertainty due to measurement errors in an uncertainty analysis using Monte Carlo simulation.
    Hofer E
    Health Phys; 2008 Sep; 95(3):277-90. PubMed ID: 18695409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing the adequacy of variance function in heteroscedastic regression models.
    Wang L; Zhou XH
    Biometrics; 2007 Dec; 63(4):1218-25. PubMed ID: 17484775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.