These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17479472)

  • 21. Re: Mammographic breast density and family history of breast cancer.
    Eisinger F
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2003 Nov; 95(22):1726; author reply 1726-7. PubMed ID: 14625266
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Mammographic density, breast cancer risk and risk prediction.
    Vachon CM; van Gils CH; Sellers TA; Ghosh K; Pruthi S; Brandt KR; Pankratz VS
    Breast Cancer Res; 2007; 9(6):217. PubMed ID: 18190724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Quantitative assessment of mammographic density and breast cancer risk for Japanese women.
    Kotsuma Y; Tamaki Y; Nishimura T; Tsubai M; Ueda S; Shimazu K; Jin Kim S; Miyoshi Y; Tanji Y; Taguchi T; Noguchi S
    Breast; 2008 Feb; 17(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 17716895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Clinical dilemma: The missing mammographic abnormality.
    Kerin MJ; Monson JR
    Br J Surg; 1999 Jul; 86(7):851-2. PubMed ID: 10417553
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Hormone replacement therapy, percent mammographic density, and sensitivity of mammography.
    Kavanagh AM; Cawson J; Byrnes GB; Giles GG; Marr G; Tong B; Gertig DM; Hopper JL
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2005 May; 14(5):1060-4. PubMed ID: 15894653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Breast cytology guidelines for a mammographic screening program. Report edited by the working group on "Breast Pathology in the Mammographic Screening Program" of the European Union].
    Sapino A; Bianchi S; Bussolati G
    Pathologica; 1999 Jun; 91(3):203-8. PubMed ID: 10536467
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Follow-up of surgical biopsies in microcalcifications of the breast. Comparative analysis of patients submitted to mammography and digitalization of mammographic images].
    Rulli A; Cirocchi R; Vento AR; Naninato P; Zanetti A; Carli L
    Minerva Chir; 1997; 52(7-8):933-6. PubMed ID: 9411295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Mammographic-histologic comparison in breast cancer with special reference to minimal cancers].
    Geppert M; Schmitt WG; Hübener KH
    Rontgenpraxis; 1984 Jul; 37(7):247-53. PubMed ID: 6484750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Mammographic density and estrogen receptor status of breast cancer.
    Ziv E; Tice J; Smith-Bindman R; Shepherd J; Cummings S; Kerlikowske K
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2004 Dec; 13(12):2090-5. PubMed ID: 15598766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. New insights into mammographic correlations in breast pathology.
    Troupin RH; Orel SG
    Curr Opin Radiol; 1991 Aug; 3(4):593-601. PubMed ID: 1653588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Coaxial core needle biopsy under mammographic guidance: indications and applications.
    Whitman GJ; Kopans DB; McCarthy KA; Stelling CB; Sneige N; Sunku K; Weiss MK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jul; 171(1):67-70. PubMed ID: 9648766
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Atypical hyperplasia of the breast: mammographic appearance and histologic correlation.
    Helvie MA; Hessler C; Frank TS; Ikeda DM
    Radiology; 1991 Jun; 179(3):759-64. PubMed ID: 2027988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Semiautomatic mammographic parenchymal patterns classification using multiple statistical features.
    Castella C; Kinkel K; Eckstein MP; Sottas PE; Verdun FR; Bochud FO
    Acad Radiol; 2007 Dec; 14(12):1486-99. PubMed ID: 18035278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Myolipoma of the breast: mammographic, sonographic, and pathologic correlation.
    McGregor DK; Whitman GJ; Middleton LP
    Breast J; 2004; 10(3):259-60. PubMed ID: 15125757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Solitary peripheral papilloma of the breast: a radiologic-pathologic correlation of a benign lesion that may mimic breast cancer on mammography.
    Kalisher L; Rickert RR; Sharo RJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Sep; 171(3):605-9. PubMed ID: 9725282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The missing mammographic abnormality.
    Zammit C; Yiangou C; Sinnett HD
    Br J Surg; 2000 Mar; 87(3):374; author reply 374-5. PubMed ID: 10755835
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Radial sclerosing lesion of the breast: mammographic features.
    Adler DD; Helvie MA; Oberman HA; Ikeda DM; Bhan AO
    Radiology; 1990 Sep; 176(3):737-40. PubMed ID: 2389032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Wolfe mammographic parenchymal patterns and breast cancer risk.
    Sickles EA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):301-3. PubMed ID: 17242234
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Mammographic breast density and cancer risk: the radiological view.
    Yaffe M; Boyd N
    Gynecol Endocrinol; 2005 Jul; 21 Suppl 1():6-11. PubMed ID: 16112949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Full-field digital mammography compared with screen-film mammography in the detection of breast cancer: rays of light through DMIST or more fog?
    Tice JA; Feldman MD
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2008 Jan; 107(2):157-65. PubMed ID: 17377840
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.