301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17479718)
1. Continuous microbiological air monitoring for aseptic filling lines.
Scherwing C; Golin F; Guenec O; Pflanz K; Dalmaso G; Bini M; Andone F
PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2007; 61(2):102-9. PubMed ID: 17479718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Continuous microbiological air monitoring for aseptic filling lines.
Ginsbury K
PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2007; 61(4):225. PubMed ID: 17933205
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the BioVigilant IMD-A, a novel optical spectroscopy technology for the continuous and real-time environmental monitoring of viable and nonviable particles. Part II. Case studies in environmental monitoring during aseptic filling, intervention assessments, and glove integrity testing in manufacturing isolators.
Miller MJ; Walsh MR; Shrake JL; Dukes RE; Hill DB
PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2009; 63(3):259-83. PubMed ID: 20069799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Media-fill simulation tests in manual and robotic aseptic preparation of injection solutions in syringes.
Krämer I; Federici M; Kaiser V; Thiesen J
J Oncol Pharm Pract; 2016 Apr; 22(2):195-204. PubMed ID: 25549919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Continuous Microbiological Environmental Monitoring for Process Understanding and Reduced Interventions in Aseptic Manufacturing.
Weber J; Hauschild J; Ijzerman-Boon P; Forng RY; Horsch J; Yan L; Prasad A; Henry RB; Claassen M; Villari P; Shereefa S; Wyatt J; Bolden JS; Pycke JT; Dassu D
PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2019; 73(2):121-134. PubMed ID: 30361285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Panel discussion: environmental sampling in an aseptic environment. I. Microbiological environmental monitoring.
Raiman HL
Bull Parenter Drug Assoc; 1974; 28(6):253-60. PubMed ID: 4616742
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Ophthalmic operating theatre--chance of limiting contamination and infection risk. Part I. Decontamination of the microbial air pollution].
Kałuzny J; Muszyński Z; Kałuzny BJ
Klin Oczna; 2008; 110(1-3):102-7. PubMed ID: 18669096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of different incubation conditions for microbiological environmental monitoring.
Gordon O; Berchtold M; Staerk A; Roesti D
PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2014; 68(5):394-406. PubMed ID: 25336415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Some observations on airborne particles in the critical areas of a blow-fill-seal machine.
Sundström S; Ljungqvist B; Reinmüller B
PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2009; 63(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 19455943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Monitoring air sampling in operating theatres: can particle counting replace microbiological sampling?
Landrin A; Bissery A; Kac G
J Hosp Infect; 2005 Sep; 61(1):27-9. PubMed ID: 16009457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Control of the aseptic processing environment.
Frieben WR
Am J Hosp Pharm; 1983 Nov; 40(11):1928-35. PubMed ID: 6650522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of microbial contamination of air in two haematology departments equipped with ventilation systems with different filtration devices.
Crimi P; Valgiusti M; Macrina G; Grieco A; Massone L; Ciucci A; Ansaldi F; Sticchi L; Sasso L; Del Buono S; Durando P
J Prev Med Hyg; 2009 Mar; 50(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 19771758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Methodology for modeling the microbial contamination of air filters.
Joe YH; Yoon KY; Hwang J
PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e88514. PubMed ID: 24523908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The biotest RCS air samplers in unidirectional flow.
Ljungqvist B; Reinmüller B
J Pharm Sci Technol; 1994; 48(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 8004418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quality Control Testing for Tracking Endotoxin-Producing Gram-Negative Bacteria during the Preparation of Polyvalent Snake Antivenom Immunoglobulin.
Sheraba NS; Diab MR; Yassin AS; Amin MA; Zedan HH
PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2015; 69(4):499-510. PubMed ID: 26242786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Panel discussion: Environmental sampling in an aseptic environment. III. Cross contamination control.
Elias WF
Bull Parenter Drug Assoc; 1974; 28(6):263-9. PubMed ID: 4455322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Continuous and Effective Microbiological Air Monitoring in Critical Environments: A Comparison of Analytical Methodologies.
Dalmaso G; Campanella A; Lazzeri P
PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2020; 74(4):446-455. PubMed ID: 32060221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of a high-volume portable bioaerosol sampler in laboratory and field environments.
An HR; Mainelis G; Yao M
Indoor Air; 2004 Dec; 14(6):385-93. PubMed ID: 15500631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interaction between air movements and the dispersion of contaminants: clean zones with unidirectional air flow.
Ljungqvist B; Reinmüller B
J Parenter Sci Technol; 1993; 47(2):60-9. PubMed ID: 8515346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Microbiological surveillance of hospital ventilation systems in departments at high risk of nosocomial infections.
Crimi P; Argellati F; Macrina G; Tinteri C; Copello L; Rebora D; Romania L; Rizzetto R
J Prev Med Hyg; 2006 Sep; 47(3):105-9. PubMed ID: 17217187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]