1059 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17481621)
1. The relative contribution of assisted reproductive technologies and ovulation induction to multiple births in the United States 5 years after the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology/American Society for Reproductive Medicine recommendation to limit the number of embryos transferred.
Dickey RP
Fertil Steril; 2007 Dec; 88(6):1554-61. PubMed ID: 17481621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2000.
Wright VC; Schieve LA; Reynolds MA; Jeng G
MMWR Surveill Summ; 2003 Aug; 52(9):1-16. PubMed ID: 14532867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2001.
Wright VC; Schieve LA; Reynolds MA; Jeng G; Kissin D
MMWR Surveill Summ; 2004 Apr; 53(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 15123982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assisted reproductive technology practice patterns and the impact of embryo transfer guidelines in the United States.
Stern JE; Cedars MI; Jain T; Klein NA; Beaird CM; Grainger DA; Gibbons WE;
Fertil Steril; 2007 Aug; 88(2):275-82. PubMed ID: 17445805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance -- United States, 2010.
Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford S; Anderson JE; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Barfield WD;
MMWR Surveill Summ; 2013 Dec; 62(9):1-24. PubMed ID: 24304902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2009.
Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Flowers L; Anderson JE; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Barfield WD;
MMWR Surveill Summ; 2012 Nov; 61(7):1-23. PubMed ID: 23114281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2011.
Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford SB; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Barfield WD;
MMWR Surveill Summ; 2014 Nov; 63(10):1-28. PubMed ID: 25412164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2003.
Wright VC; Chang J; Jeng G; Macaluso M
MMWR Surveill Summ; 2006 May; 55(4):1-22. PubMed ID: 16723970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2002.
Wright VC; Schieve LA; Reynolds MA; Jeng G;
MMWR Surveill Summ; 2005 Jun; 54(2):1-24. PubMed ID: 15931153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance - United States, 2004.
Wright VC; Chang J; Jeng G; Chen M; Macaluso M;
MMWR Surveill Summ; 2007 Jun; 56(6):1-22. PubMed ID: 17557073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2006.
Sunderam S; Chang J; Flowers L; Kulkarni A; Sentelle G; Jeng G; Macaluso M;
MMWR Surveill Summ; 2009 Jun; 58(5):1-25. PubMed ID: 19521336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance — United States, 2012.
Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford SB; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Warner L; Barfield WD;
MMWR Surveill Summ; 2015 Aug; 64(6):1-29. PubMed ID: 26270152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2005.
Wright VC; Chang J; Jeng G; Macaluso M;
MMWR Surveill Summ; 2008 Jun; 57(5):1-23. PubMed ID: 18566567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Trends in embryo-transfer practice and in outcomes of the use of assisted reproductive technology in the United States.
Jain T; Missmer SA; Hornstein MD
N Engl J Med; 2004 Apr; 350(16):1639-45. PubMed ID: 15084696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction?: no single outcome measure is satisfactory when evaluating success in assisted reproduction; both twin births and singleton births should be counted as successes.
Dickey RP; Sartor BM; Pyrzak R
Hum Reprod; 2004 Apr; 19(4):783-7. PubMed ID: 15016781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance -
United States, 2013.
Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford SB; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Warner L; Barfield WD;
MMWR Surveill Summ; 2015 Dec; 64(11):1-25. PubMed ID: 26633040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ICMART) world report: assisted reproductive technology 2004.
Sullivan EA; Zegers-Hochschild F; Mansour R; Ishihara O; de Mouzon J; Nygren KG; Adamson GD
Hum Reprod; 2013 May; 28(5):1375-90. PubMed ID: 23442757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 2001 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry.
;
Fertil Steril; 2007 Jun; 87(6):1253-66. PubMed ID: 17276436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimizing the number of cleavage stage embryos to transfer on day 3 in women 38 years of age and older: a Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology database study.
Stern JE; Goldman MB; Hatasaka H; MacKenzie TA; Surrey ES; Racowsky C;
Fertil Steril; 2009 Mar; 91(3):767-76. PubMed ID: 18321489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. High rates of embryo wastage with use of assisted reproductive technology: a look at the trends between 1995 and 2001 in the United States.
Kovalevsky G; Patrizio P
Fertil Steril; 2005 Aug; 84(2):325-30. PubMed ID: 16084872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
