These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1060 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17481621)

  • 1. The relative contribution of assisted reproductive technologies and ovulation induction to multiple births in the United States 5 years after the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology/American Society for Reproductive Medicine recommendation to limit the number of embryos transferred.
    Dickey RP
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Dec; 88(6):1554-61. PubMed ID: 17481621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2000.
    Wright VC; Schieve LA; Reynolds MA; Jeng G
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2003 Aug; 52(9):1-16. PubMed ID: 14532867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2001.
    Wright VC; Schieve LA; Reynolds MA; Jeng G; Kissin D
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2004 Apr; 53(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 15123982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assisted reproductive technology practice patterns and the impact of embryo transfer guidelines in the United States.
    Stern JE; Cedars MI; Jain T; Klein NA; Beaird CM; Grainger DA; Gibbons WE;
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Aug; 88(2):275-82. PubMed ID: 17445805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance -- United States, 2010.
    Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford S; Anderson JE; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Barfield WD;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2013 Dec; 62(9):1-24. PubMed ID: 24304902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2009.
    Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Flowers L; Anderson JE; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Barfield WD;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2012 Nov; 61(7):1-23. PubMed ID: 23114281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2011.
    Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford SB; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Barfield WD;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2014 Nov; 63(10):1-28. PubMed ID: 25412164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2003.
    Wright VC; Chang J; Jeng G; Macaluso M
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2006 May; 55(4):1-22. PubMed ID: 16723970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2002.
    Wright VC; Schieve LA; Reynolds MA; Jeng G;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2005 Jun; 54(2):1-24. PubMed ID: 15931153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance - United States, 2004.
    Wright VC; Chang J; Jeng G; Chen M; Macaluso M;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2007 Jun; 56(6):1-22. PubMed ID: 17557073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2006.
    Sunderam S; Chang J; Flowers L; Kulkarni A; Sentelle G; Jeng G; Macaluso M;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2009 Jun; 58(5):1-25. PubMed ID: 19521336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance — United States, 2012.
    Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford SB; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Warner L; Barfield WD;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2015 Aug; 64(6):1-29. PubMed ID: 26270152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2005.
    Wright VC; Chang J; Jeng G; Macaluso M;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2008 Jun; 57(5):1-23. PubMed ID: 18566567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Trends in embryo-transfer practice and in outcomes of the use of assisted reproductive technology in the United States.
    Jain T; Missmer SA; Hornstein MD
    N Engl J Med; 2004 Apr; 350(16):1639-45. PubMed ID: 15084696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction?: no single outcome measure is satisfactory when evaluating success in assisted reproduction; both twin births and singleton births should be counted as successes.
    Dickey RP; Sartor BM; Pyrzak R
    Hum Reprod; 2004 Apr; 19(4):783-7. PubMed ID: 15016781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance - 
United States, 2013.
    Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford SB; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Warner L; Barfield WD;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2015 Dec; 64(11):1-25. PubMed ID: 26633040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ICMART) world report: assisted reproductive technology 2004.
    Sullivan EA; Zegers-Hochschild F; Mansour R; Ishihara O; de Mouzon J; Nygren KG; Adamson GD
    Hum Reprod; 2013 May; 28(5):1375-90. PubMed ID: 23442757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 2001 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry.
    ;
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Jun; 87(6):1253-66. PubMed ID: 17276436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimizing the number of cleavage stage embryos to transfer on day 3 in women 38 years of age and older: a Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology database study.
    Stern JE; Goldman MB; Hatasaka H; MacKenzie TA; Surrey ES; Racowsky C;
    Fertil Steril; 2009 Mar; 91(3):767-76. PubMed ID: 18321489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. High rates of embryo wastage with use of assisted reproductive technology: a look at the trends between 1995 and 2001 in the United States.
    Kovalevsky G; Patrizio P
    Fertil Steril; 2005 Aug; 84(2):325-30. PubMed ID: 16084872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 53.