These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17482468)

  • 1. Arthroscopic single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Retrospective review of 4- versus 7-strand hamstring tendon graft.
    Zhao J; Huangfu X
    Knee; 2007 Aug; 14(4):301-5. PubMed ID: 17482468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: four versus eight strands of hamstring tendon graft.
    Zhao J; He Y; Wang J
    Arthroscopy; 2007 Jul; 23(7):766-70. PubMed ID: 17637413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Arthroscopic single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: retrospective review of hamstring tendon graft versus LARS artificial ligament.
    Li B; Wen Y; Wu H; Qian Q; Wu Y; Lin X
    Int Orthop; 2009 Aug; 33(4):991-6. PubMed ID: 18654776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [ARTHROSCOPIC SINGLE BUNDLE POSTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION USING HAMSTRING TENDONS THROUGH POSTERIOR TRANS-SEPTUM PORTAL APPROACH WITH PRESERVATION OF REMNANT POSTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT FIBERS].
    Zhang L; Gao Q; Ma Z; Sun X; Ma C; Liu Z; Yang M; Liu Z; He Y
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Nov; 29(11):1364-8. PubMed ID: 26875268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of hamstring tendon autograft and tibialis anterior allograft in arthroscopic transtibial single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
    Li B; Wang JS; He M; Wang GB; Shen P; Bai LH
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2015 Oct; 23(10):3077-84. PubMed ID: 25193568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Double-bundle transtibial posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a tendon-patellar bone-semitendinosus tendon autograft: clinical results with a minimum of 2 years' follow-up.
    Garofalo R; Jolles BM; Moretti B; Siegrist O
    Arthroscopy; 2006 Dec; 22(12):1331-1338.e1. PubMed ID: 17157733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Second-look arthroscopic assessment of arthroscopic single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison of mixed graft versus achilles tendon allograft.
    Yang JH; Yoon JR; Jeong HI; Hwang DH; Woo SJ; Kwon JH; Nha KW
    Am J Sports Med; 2012 Sep; 40(9):2052-60. PubMed ID: 22875790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Proprioceptive function after isolated single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with remnant preservation for chronic posterior cruciate ligament injuries.
    Eguchi A; Adachi N; Nakamae A; Usman MA; Deie M; Ochi M
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2014 May; 100(3):303-8. PubMed ID: 24679366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft: results with a minimum 4-year follow-up.
    Chen CH; Chuang TY; Wang KC; Chen WJ; Shih CH
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2006 Nov; 14(11):1045-54. PubMed ID: 16816985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Combined anterior cruciate ligament, posterior cruciate ligament, and posterolateral corner reconstruction with autogenous hamstring grafts in chronic instabilities.
    Strobel MJ; Schulz MS; Petersen WJ; Eichhorn HJ
    Arthroscopy; 2006 Feb; 22(2):182-92. PubMed ID: 16458804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Effectiveness of arthroscopic single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with remnant preservation and quadrupled hamstring tendons].
    Kong Y; Zhang Y; Zhao X
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Sep; 27(9):1037-40. PubMed ID: 24279009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Endoscopic single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: results at minimum 2-year follow-up.
    Deehan DJ; Salmon LJ; Russell VJ; Pinczewski LA
    Arthroscopy; 2003 Nov; 19(9):955-62. PubMed ID: 14608314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Endoscopically-assisted single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: results at minimum ten-year follow-up.
    Jackson WF; van der Tempel WM; Salmon LJ; Williams HA; Pinczewski LA
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2008 Oct; 90(10):1328-33. PubMed ID: 18827243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: double-loop hamstring tendon autograft versus Achilles tendon allograft--clinical results of a minimum 2-year follow-up.
    Ahn JH; Yoo JC; Wang JH
    Arthroscopy; 2005 Aug; 21(8):965-9. PubMed ID: 16084294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transtibial versus tibial inlay techniques for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: long-term follow-up study.
    Song EK; Park HW; Ahn YS; Seon JK
    Am J Sports Med; 2014 Dec; 42(12):2964-71. PubMed ID: 25288624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sandwich-style posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
    Zhao J; Xiaoqiao H; He Y; Yang X; Liu C; Lu Z
    Arthroscopy; 2008 Jun; 24(6):650-9. PubMed ID: 18514108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a non-hardware suspension fixation technique and 8 strands of autogenous hamstring tendons.
    Chen B; Gao S
    Arthroscopy; 2009 Jul; 25(7):777-82. PubMed ID: 19560642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of tibial inlay versus transtibial techniques for isolated posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: minimum 2-year follow-up.
    MacGillivray JD; Stein BE; Park M; Allen AA; Wickiewicz TL; Warren RF
    Arthroscopy; 2006 Mar; 22(3):320-8. PubMed ID: 16517317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tensioning of remnant posterior cruciate ligament and reconstruction of anterolateral bundle in chronic posterior cruciate ligament injury.
    Jung YB; Jung HJ; Tae SK; Lee YS; Yang DL
    Arthroscopy; 2006 Mar; 22(3):329-38. PubMed ID: 16517318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. No Clinically Important Difference in Knee Scores or Instability Between Transtibial and Inlay Techniques for PCL Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.
    Shin YS; Kim HJ; Lee DH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Apr; 475(4):1239-1248. PubMed ID: 27896678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.