These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: four versus eight strands of hamstring tendon graft. Zhao J; He Y; Wang J Arthroscopy; 2007 Jul; 23(7):766-70. PubMed ID: 17637413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Arthroscopic single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: retrospective review of hamstring tendon graft versus LARS artificial ligament. Li B; Wen Y; Wu H; Qian Q; Wu Y; Lin X Int Orthop; 2009 Aug; 33(4):991-6. PubMed ID: 18654776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [ARTHROSCOPIC SINGLE BUNDLE POSTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION USING HAMSTRING TENDONS THROUGH POSTERIOR TRANS-SEPTUM PORTAL APPROACH WITH PRESERVATION OF REMNANT POSTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT FIBERS]. Zhang L; Gao Q; Ma Z; Sun X; Ma C; Liu Z; Yang M; Liu Z; He Y Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Nov; 29(11):1364-8. PubMed ID: 26875268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of hamstring tendon autograft and tibialis anterior allograft in arthroscopic transtibial single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Li B; Wang JS; He M; Wang GB; Shen P; Bai LH Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2015 Oct; 23(10):3077-84. PubMed ID: 25193568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Double-bundle transtibial posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a tendon-patellar bone-semitendinosus tendon autograft: clinical results with a minimum of 2 years' follow-up. Garofalo R; Jolles BM; Moretti B; Siegrist O Arthroscopy; 2006 Dec; 22(12):1331-1338.e1. PubMed ID: 17157733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Second-look arthroscopic assessment of arthroscopic single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison of mixed graft versus achilles tendon allograft. Yang JH; Yoon JR; Jeong HI; Hwang DH; Woo SJ; Kwon JH; Nha KW Am J Sports Med; 2012 Sep; 40(9):2052-60. PubMed ID: 22875790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Proprioceptive function after isolated single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with remnant preservation for chronic posterior cruciate ligament injuries. Eguchi A; Adachi N; Nakamae A; Usman MA; Deie M; Ochi M Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2014 May; 100(3):303-8. PubMed ID: 24679366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Endoscopically-assisted single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: results at minimum ten-year follow-up. Jackson WF; van der Tempel WM; Salmon LJ; Williams HA; Pinczewski LA J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2008 Oct; 90(10):1328-33. PubMed ID: 18827243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: double-loop hamstring tendon autograft versus Achilles tendon allograft--clinical results of a minimum 2-year follow-up. Ahn JH; Yoo JC; Wang JH Arthroscopy; 2005 Aug; 21(8):965-9. PubMed ID: 16084294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transtibial versus tibial inlay techniques for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: long-term follow-up study. Song EK; Park HW; Ahn YS; Seon JK Am J Sports Med; 2014 Dec; 42(12):2964-71. PubMed ID: 25288624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sandwich-style posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Zhao J; Xiaoqiao H; He Y; Yang X; Liu C; Lu Z Arthroscopy; 2008 Jun; 24(6):650-9. PubMed ID: 18514108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a non-hardware suspension fixation technique and 8 strands of autogenous hamstring tendons. Chen B; Gao S Arthroscopy; 2009 Jul; 25(7):777-82. PubMed ID: 19560642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of tibial inlay versus transtibial techniques for isolated posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: minimum 2-year follow-up. MacGillivray JD; Stein BE; Park M; Allen AA; Wickiewicz TL; Warren RF Arthroscopy; 2006 Mar; 22(3):320-8. PubMed ID: 16517317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Tensioning of remnant posterior cruciate ligament and reconstruction of anterolateral bundle in chronic posterior cruciate ligament injury. Jung YB; Jung HJ; Tae SK; Lee YS; Yang DL Arthroscopy; 2006 Mar; 22(3):329-38. PubMed ID: 16517318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. No Clinically Important Difference in Knee Scores or Instability Between Transtibial and Inlay Techniques for PCL Reconstruction: A Systematic Review. Shin YS; Kim HJ; Lee DH Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Apr; 475(4):1239-1248. PubMed ID: 27896678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]