These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

677 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17482603)

  • 1. Insurance mandates and trends in infertility treatments.
    Henne MB; Bundorf MK
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Jan; 89(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 17482603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assisted reproductive technology use, embryo transfer practices, and birth outcomes after infertility insurance mandates: New Jersey and Connecticut.
    Crawford S; Boulet SL; Jamieson DJ; Stone C; Mullen J; Kissin DM
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Feb; 105(2):347-55. PubMed ID: 26515377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2009.
    Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Flowers L; Anderson JE; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Barfield WD;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2012 Nov; 61(7):1-23. PubMed ID: 23114281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Insurance mandates, embryo transfer, outcomes--the link is tenuous.
    Banks NK; Norian JM; Bundorf MK; Henne MB
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Dec; 94(7):2776-9. PubMed ID: 20579988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance -- United States, 2010.
    Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford S; Anderson JE; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Barfield WD;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2013 Dec; 62(9):1-24. PubMed ID: 24304902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Infertility insurance mandates and multiple births.
    Buckles KS
    Health Econ; 2013 Jul; 22(7):775-89. PubMed ID: 22692947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of legislation on outcomes of assisted reproduction technology: lessons from the 2004 Italian law.
    La Sala GB; Villani MT; Nicoli A; Valli B; Iannotti F; Blickstein I
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Apr; 89(4):854-9. PubMed ID: 17681340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of competition on assisted reproductive technology outcomes.
    Henne MB; Bundorf MK
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Apr; 93(6):1820-30. PubMed ID: 18442821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2006 results from the Canadian ART Register.
    Gunby J; Bissonnette F; Librach C; Cowan L;
    Fertil Steril; 2010 May; 93(7):2189-201. PubMed ID: 19439295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Health disparities and infertility: impacts of state-level insurance mandates.
    Bitler M; Schmidt L
    Fertil Steril; 2006 Apr; 85(4):858-65. PubMed ID: 16580365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2002 results from the Canadian ART Register.
    Gunby J; Daya S;
    Fertil Steril; 2006 Nov; 86(5):1356-64. PubMed ID: 17070192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assisted reproductive technologies in Canada: 2005 results from the Canadian Assisted Reproductive Technologies Register.
    Gunby J; Bissonnette F; Librach C; Cowan L;
    Fertil Steril; 2009 May; 91(5):1721-30. PubMed ID: 18423460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2003 results from the Canadian ART Register.
    Gunby J; Daya S;
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Sep; 88(3):550-9. PubMed ID: 17303133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Unmet financial burden of infertility care and the impact of state insurance mandates in the United States: analysis from a popular crowdfunding platform.
    Lai JD; Fantus RJ; Cohen AJ; Wan V; Hudnall MT; Pham M; Brannigan RE; Halpern JA
    Fertil Steril; 2021 Oct; 116(4):1119-1125. PubMed ID: 34246467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2001.
    Wright VC; Schieve LA; Reynolds MA; Jeng G; Kissin D
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2004 Apr; 53(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 15123982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of insurance mandates on choices and outcomes in infertility treatment markets.
    Hamilton BH; McManus B
    Health Econ; 2012 Aug; 21(8):994-1016. PubMed ID: 21905150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Access to assisted reproductive technology centers in the United States.
    Nangia AK; Likosky DS; Wang D
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Feb; 93(3):745-61. PubMed ID: 19081563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Insurance coverage and outcomes of in vitro fertilization.
    Jain T; Harlow BL; Hornstein MD
    N Engl J Med; 2002 Aug; 347(9):661-6. PubMed ID: 12200554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The relative contribution of assisted reproductive technologies and ovulation induction to multiple births in the United States 5 years after the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology/American Society for Reproductive Medicine recommendation to limit the number of embryos transferred.
    Dickey RP
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Dec; 88(6):1554-61. PubMed ID: 17481621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 2001 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry.
    ;
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Jun; 87(6):1253-66. PubMed ID: 17276436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 34.