248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17484000)
1. Radio frequency identification (RFID) applied to surgical sponges.
Rogers A; Jones E; Oleynikov D
Surg Endosc; 2007 Jul; 21(7):1235-7. PubMed ID: 17484000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Radio-frequency surgical sponge detection: a new way to lower the odds of leaving sponges (and similar items) in patients.
Health Devices; 2008 Jul; 37(7):193-202. PubMed ID: 18771206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Initial clinical evaluation of a handheld device for detecting retained surgical gauze sponges using radiofrequency identification technology.
Macario A; Morris D; Morris S
Arch Surg; 2006 Jul; 141(7):659-62. PubMed ID: 16847236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Real-time monitoring for detection of retained surgical sponges and team motion in the surgical operation room using radio-frequency-identification (RFID) technology: a preclinical evaluation.
Kranzfelder M; Zywitza D; Jell T; Schneider A; Gillen S; Friess H; Feussner H
J Surg Res; 2012 Jun; 175(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 21571315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Role of Radio Frequency Detection System Embedded Surgical Sponges in Preventing Retained Surgical Sponges: A Prospective Evaluation in Patients Undergoing Emergency Surgery.
Inaba K; Okoye O; Aksoy H; Skiada D; Ault G; Sener S; Lam L; Benjamin E; Demetriades D
Ann Surg; 2016 Oct; 264(4):599-604. PubMed ID: 27433911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prevention of retained surgical items.
Feldman DL
Mt Sinai J Med; 2011; 78(6):865-71. PubMed ID: 22069210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiofrequency-Based Identification Medical Device: An Evaluable Solution for Surgical Sponge Retrieval?
Lazzaro A; Corona A; Iezzi L; Quaresima S; Armisi L; Piccolo I; Medaglia CM; Sbrenni S; Sileri P; Rosato N; Gaspari AL; Di Lorenzo N
Surg Innov; 2017 Jun; 24(3):268-275. PubMed ID: 28178883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of radiofrequency device sensitivity for the detection of retained surgical sponges in patients with morbid obesity.
Steelman VM; Alasagheirin MH
Arch Surg; 2012 Oct; 147(10):955-60. PubMed ID: 23070411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Retained surgical sponges (gossypiboma).
Bani-Hani KE; Gharaibeh KA; Yaghan RJ
Asian J Surg; 2005 Apr; 28(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 15851364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Effect of Radiofrequency Technology on Time Spent Searching for Surgical Sponges and Associated Costs.
Steelman VM; Schaapveld AG; Storm HE; Perkhounkova Y; Shane DM
AORN J; 2019 Jun; 109(6):718-727. PubMed ID: 31135978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [The retained surgical sponge, an ongoing surgical problem].
Keeman JN
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2002 Feb; 146(6):245-6. PubMed ID: 11865651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Use of Radiofrequency Detection to Mitigate the Risk of Retained Surgical Sponges.
Bardes JM; Inaba K
Adv Surg; 2017 Sep; 51(1):219-227. PubMed ID: 28797342
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of plain abdominal radiographs in the detection of retained surgical needles in the peritoneal cavity.
Ponrartana S; Coakley FV; Yeh BM; Breiman RS; Qayyum A; Joe BN; Poder L; Lu Y; Gibbs VC; Roberts JP
Ann Surg; 2008 Jan; 247(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 18156915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Using Radiofrequency Technology to Prevent Retained Sponges and Improve Patient Outcomes.
Primiano M; Sparks D; Murphy J; Glaser K; McNett M
AORN J; 2020 Oct; 112(4):345-352. PubMed ID: 32990961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Implementation of a protocol to reduce occurrence of retained sponges after vaginal delivery.
Lutgendorf MA; Schindler LL; Hill JB; Magann EF; O'Boyle JD
Mil Med; 2011 Jun; 176(6):702-4. PubMed ID: 21702393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Gossypiboma--retained surgical sponge.
Sun HS; Chen SL; Kuo CC; Wang SC; Kao YL
J Chin Med Assoc; 2007 Nov; 70(11):511-3. PubMed ID: 18063507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. RFID tags help alert surgeons to problems.
Healthcare Benchmarks Qual Improv; 2006 Oct; 13(10):118-20. PubMed ID: 17017053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A serious medicolegal problem after surgery: gossypiboma.
Gümüş M; Gümüş H; Kapan M; Onder A; Tekbaş G; Baç B
Am J Forensic Med Pathol; 2012 Mar; 33(1):54-7. PubMed ID: 21562399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The frequency and significance of discrepancies in the surgical count.
Greenberg CC; Regenbogen SE; Lipsitz SR; Diaz-Flores R; Gawande AA
Ann Surg; 2008 Aug; 248(2):337-41. PubMed ID: 18650646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Hidden Costs of Reconciling Surgical Sponge Counts.
Steelman VM; Schaapveld AG; Perkhounkova Y; Storm HE; Mathias M
AORN J; 2015 Nov; 102(5):498-506. PubMed ID: 26514707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
