These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17484000)

  • 1. Radio frequency identification (RFID) applied to surgical sponges.
    Rogers A; Jones E; Oleynikov D
    Surg Endosc; 2007 Jul; 21(7):1235-7. PubMed ID: 17484000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Radio-frequency surgical sponge detection: a new way to lower the odds of leaving sponges (and similar items) in patients.
    Health Devices; 2008 Jul; 37(7):193-202. PubMed ID: 18771206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Initial clinical evaluation of a handheld device for detecting retained surgical gauze sponges using radiofrequency identification technology.
    Macario A; Morris D; Morris S
    Arch Surg; 2006 Jul; 141(7):659-62. PubMed ID: 16847236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Real-time monitoring for detection of retained surgical sponges and team motion in the surgical operation room using radio-frequency-identification (RFID) technology: a preclinical evaluation.
    Kranzfelder M; Zywitza D; Jell T; Schneider A; Gillen S; Friess H; Feussner H
    J Surg Res; 2012 Jun; 175(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 21571315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Role of Radio Frequency Detection System Embedded Surgical Sponges in Preventing Retained Surgical Sponges: A Prospective Evaluation in Patients Undergoing Emergency Surgery.
    Inaba K; Okoye O; Aksoy H; Skiada D; Ault G; Sener S; Lam L; Benjamin E; Demetriades D
    Ann Surg; 2016 Oct; 264(4):599-604. PubMed ID: 27433911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prevention of retained surgical items.
    Feldman DL
    Mt Sinai J Med; 2011; 78(6):865-71. PubMed ID: 22069210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Radiofrequency-Based Identification Medical Device: An Evaluable Solution for Surgical Sponge Retrieval?
    Lazzaro A; Corona A; Iezzi L; Quaresima S; Armisi L; Piccolo I; Medaglia CM; Sbrenni S; Sileri P; Rosato N; Gaspari AL; Di Lorenzo N
    Surg Innov; 2017 Jun; 24(3):268-275. PubMed ID: 28178883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of radiofrequency device sensitivity for the detection of retained surgical sponges in patients with morbid obesity.
    Steelman VM; Alasagheirin MH
    Arch Surg; 2012 Oct; 147(10):955-60. PubMed ID: 23070411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Retained surgical sponges (gossypiboma).
    Bani-Hani KE; Gharaibeh KA; Yaghan RJ
    Asian J Surg; 2005 Apr; 28(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 15851364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Effect of Radiofrequency Technology on Time Spent Searching for Surgical Sponges and Associated Costs.
    Steelman VM; Schaapveld AG; Storm HE; Perkhounkova Y; Shane DM
    AORN J; 2019 Jun; 109(6):718-727. PubMed ID: 31135978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The retained surgical sponge, an ongoing surgical problem].
    Keeman JN
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2002 Feb; 146(6):245-6. PubMed ID: 11865651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Use of Radiofrequency Detection to Mitigate the Risk of Retained Surgical Sponges.
    Bardes JM; Inaba K
    Adv Surg; 2017 Sep; 51(1):219-227. PubMed ID: 28797342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of plain abdominal radiographs in the detection of retained surgical needles in the peritoneal cavity.
    Ponrartana S; Coakley FV; Yeh BM; Breiman RS; Qayyum A; Joe BN; Poder L; Lu Y; Gibbs VC; Roberts JP
    Ann Surg; 2008 Jan; 247(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 18156915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using Radiofrequency Technology to Prevent Retained Sponges and Improve Patient Outcomes.
    Primiano M; Sparks D; Murphy J; Glaser K; McNett M
    AORN J; 2020 Oct; 112(4):345-352. PubMed ID: 32990961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Implementation of a protocol to reduce occurrence of retained sponges after vaginal delivery.
    Lutgendorf MA; Schindler LL; Hill JB; Magann EF; O'Boyle JD
    Mil Med; 2011 Jun; 176(6):702-4. PubMed ID: 21702393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Gossypiboma--retained surgical sponge.
    Sun HS; Chen SL; Kuo CC; Wang SC; Kao YL
    J Chin Med Assoc; 2007 Nov; 70(11):511-3. PubMed ID: 18063507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. RFID tags help alert surgeons to problems.
    Healthcare Benchmarks Qual Improv; 2006 Oct; 13(10):118-20. PubMed ID: 17017053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A serious medicolegal problem after surgery: gossypiboma.
    Gümüş M; Gümüş H; Kapan M; Onder A; Tekbaş G; Baç B
    Am J Forensic Med Pathol; 2012 Mar; 33(1):54-7. PubMed ID: 21562399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The frequency and significance of discrepancies in the surgical count.
    Greenberg CC; Regenbogen SE; Lipsitz SR; Diaz-Flores R; Gawande AA
    Ann Surg; 2008 Aug; 248(2):337-41. PubMed ID: 18650646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Hidden Costs of Reconciling Surgical Sponge Counts.
    Steelman VM; Schaapveld AG; Perkhounkova Y; Storm HE; Mathias M
    AORN J; 2015 Nov; 102(5):498-506. PubMed ID: 26514707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.