145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17485016)
1. The diagnostic value of adenosine stress-contrast echocardiography for diagnosis of coronary artery disease in hypertensive patients: comparison to Tl-201 single-photon emission computed tomography.
Aggeli C; Christoforatou E; Giannopoulos G; Roussakis G; Kokkinakis C; Barbetseas J; Vlachopoulos C; Stefanadis C
Am J Hypertens; 2007 May; 20(5):533-8. PubMed ID: 17485016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Detection of coronary artery disease using real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography: a comparison with dual-isotope resting thallium-201/stress technectium-99m sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography.
Lin SL; Chiou KR; Huang WC; Peng NJ; Tsay DG; Liu CP
Heart Vessels; 2006 Jul; 21(4):226-35. PubMed ID: 16865298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Adenosine stress myocardial contrast echocardiography for the detection of coronary artery disease: a comparison with coronary angiography and cardiac magnetic resonance.
Arnold JR; Karamitsos TD; Pegg TJ; Francis JM; Olszewski R; Searle N; Senior R; Neubauer S; Becher H; Selvanayagam JB
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 Sep; 3(9):934-43. PubMed ID: 20846628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of sulfur hexafluoride microbubble (SonoVue)-enhanced myocardial contrast echocardiography with gated single-photon emission computed tomography for detection of significant coronary artery disease: a large European multicenter study.
Senior R; Moreo A; Gaibazzi N; Agati L; Tiemann K; Shivalkar B; von Bardeleben S; Galiuto L; Lardoux H; Trocino G; Carrió I; Le Guludec D; Sambuceti G; Becher H; Colonna P; Ten Cate F; Bramucci E; Cohen A; Bezante G; Aggeli C; Kasprzak JD
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Oct; 62(15):1353-61. PubMed ID: 23770168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast echocardiography during adenosine stress for detection of abnormal myocardial perfusion: a prospective comparison with technetium-99 m sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography.
Abdelmoneim SS; Bernier M; Dhoble A; Moir S; Hagen ME; Ness SA; Pellikka PA; Abdel-Kader SS; Mulvagh SL
Heart Vessels; 2010 Mar; 25(2):121-30. PubMed ID: 20339973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Absolute myocardial blood flow determination using real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography during adenosine stress: comparison with single-photon emission computed tomography.
Abdelmoneim SS; Dhoble A; Bernier M; Moir S; Hagen ME; Ness SA; Abdel-Kader SS; Pellikka PA; Mulvagh SL
Heart; 2009 Oct; 95(20):1662-8. PubMed ID: 19584062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of myocardial contrast echocardiography with SPECT in the evaluation of coronary artery disease in asymptomatic patients with LBBB.
Karavidas AI; Matsakas EP; Lazaros GA; Brestas PS; Avramidis DA; Zacharoulis AA; Fotiadis IN; Korres DA; Zacharoulis AA
Int J Cardiol; 2006 Oct; 112(3):334-40. PubMed ID: 16307807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accelerated stress real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography for the detection of coronary artery disease: comparison with 99mTc single photon emission computed tomography.
Lipiec P; Wejner-Mik P; Krzemińska-Pakuła M; Kuśmierek J; Płachcińska A; Szumiński R; Peruga JZ; Kasprzak JD
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2008 Aug; 21(8):941-7. PubMed ID: 18385014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Non-invasive detection of coronary artery stenosis: a comparison among power-Doppler contrast echo, 99Tc-Sestamibi SPECT and echo wall-motion analysis.
Rocchi G; Fallani F; Bracchetti G; Rapezzi C; Ferlito M; Levorato M; Reggiani LB; Branzi A
Coron Artery Dis; 2003 May; 14(3):239-45. PubMed ID: 12702928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of myocardial perfusion during adenosine stress using real time three-dimensional and two-dimensional myocardial contrast echocardiography: comparison with single-photon emission computed tomography.
Abdelmoneim SS; Bernier M; Dhoble A; Moir S; Hagen ME; Ness SA; Abdel-Kader SS; Pellikka PA; Mulvagh SL
Echocardiography; 2010 Apr; 27(4):421-9. PubMed ID: 20331695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Detection of coronary artery disease by adenosine triphosphate stress echocardiography: comparison with adenosine triphosphate stress thallium myocardial scintigraphy and coronary angiography].
Harada M; Okura K; Nishizawa S; Inoue T; Sakai H; Lee T; Sugiyama Y; Suzuki M; Hirai H; Yamaguchi T
J Cardiol; 1998 Sep; 32(3):163-71. PubMed ID: 9783237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography for pharmacologic stress testing: is quantitative estimation of myocardial blood flow reserve necessary?
Korosoglou G; da Silva KG; Labadze N; Dubart AE; Hansen A; Rosenberg M; Zehelein J; Kuecherer H
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2004 Jan; 17(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 14712180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of thallium-201 exercise SPECT and dobutamine stress echocardiography for diagnosis of coronary artery disease in patients with left bundle branch block.
Tandoğan I; Yetkin E; Yanik A; Ulusoy FV; Temizhan A; Cehreli S; Sasmaz A
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2001 Oct; 17(5):339-45. PubMed ID: 12025947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-Term Association of Dipyridamole Stress Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography versus Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography with Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Known or Suspected Coronary Artery Disease.
Karogiannis N; Vamvakidou A; Gurunathan S; Pabla J; Young G; Senior R
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2018 Aug; 31(8):860-869. PubMed ID: 29861279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Myocardial contrast echocardiography in the evaluation of myocardial perfusion in patients with left bundle branch block and coronary artery disease.
Felis S; Deste W; Colonna P; Ragusa A; Scandura S; Giannotta D; Iliceto S; Tamburino C
Ital Heart J; 2005 Dec; 6(12):956-61. PubMed ID: 16502709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of real-time coherent contrast imaging to dipyridamole thallium-201 single-photon emission computed tomography for assessment of myocardial perfusion and left ventricular wall motion.
Oraby MA; Hays J; Maklady FA; El-Hawary AA; Yaneza LO; Zabalgoitia M
Am J Cardiol; 2002 Sep; 90(5):449-54. PubMed ID: 12208400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Myocardial contrast echocardiography for the detection of coronary artery stenosis: a prospective multicenter study in comparison with single-photon emission computed tomography.
Jeetley P; Hickman M; Kamp O; Lang RM; Thomas JD; Vannan MA; Vanoverschelde JL; van der Wouw PA; Senior R
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2006 Jan; 47(1):141-5. PubMed ID: 16386678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Vasodilator Stress Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography or Contrast Stress Echocardiography Association with Hard Cardiac Events in Suspected Coronary Artery Disease.
Gaibazzi N; Siniscalchi C; Porter TR; Crocamo A; Basaglia M; Boffetti F; Lorenzoni V
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2018 Jun; 31(6):683-691. PubMed ID: 29580695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A head-to-head comparison of infusion and bolus doses of adenosine for stress myocardial contrast echocardiography.
Nesser HJ; Yao J; Soman P; Tkalec W; Ebner C; Steringer-Mascherbauer R; Markt B; Samenuk D; Ng CK; Morcerf F; Udelson JE; Pandian NG
Echocardiography; 2006 Jul; 23(6):483-9. PubMed ID: 16839386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Real-time perfusion adenosine stress echocardiography versus myocardial perfusion adenosine scintigraphy for the detection of myocardial ischaemia in patients with stable coronary artery disease.
Gudmundsson P; Winter R; Dencker M; Kitlinski M; Thorsson O; Ljunggren L; Willenheimer R
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2006 Jan; 26(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 16398668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]