219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17485910)
21. Ultrasonography-Based Radiomics of Screening-Detected Ductal Carcinoma In Situ According to Visibility on Mammography.
Koh J; Lee E; Han K; Lee YH; Kwak JY; Yoon JH; Moon HJ
Ultrasound Q; 2020 Nov; 37(1):23-27. PubMed ID: 33186269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. MR imaging of ductal carcinoma in situ.
Orel SG; Mendonca MH; Reynolds C; Schnall MD; Solin LJ; Sullivan DC
Radiology; 1997 Feb; 202(2):413-20. PubMed ID: 9015067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Assessment of BI-RADS category 4 lesions detected with screening mammography and screening US: utility of MR imaging.
Strobel K; Schrading S; Hansen NL; Barabasch A; Kuhl CK
Radiology; 2015 Feb; 274(2):343-51. PubMed ID: 25271857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Ultrasound findings and histological features of ductal carcinoma in situ detected by ultrasound examination alone.
Izumori A; Takebe K; Sato A
Breast Cancer; 2010 Apr; 17(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 19575283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Ultrasound Demonstration of Mammographically Detected Microcalcifications in Patients with Ductal Carcinoma in situ of the Breast.
Nagashima T; Hashimoto H; Oshida K; Nakano S; Tanabe N; Nikaido T; Koda K; Miyazaki M
Breast Cancer; 2005; 12(3):216-20. PubMed ID: 16110292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. US-guided 14G core needle biopsy: comparison between underestimated and correctly diagnosed breast cancers.
Kim H; Youk JH; Kim JA; Gweon HM; Jung WH; Son EJ
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(7):3179-83. PubMed ID: 24815467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Malignant and benign diseases of the breast in 41 male patients: mammography, sonography and pathohistological correlations].
Partik B; Mallek R; Rudas M; Pokieser P; Wunderbaldinger P; Helbich TH
Rofo; 2001 Nov; 173(11):1012-8. PubMed ID: 11704911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Three-dimensional RODEO breast MR imaging of lesions containing ductal carcinoma in situ.
Soderstrom CE; Harms SE; Copit DS; Evans WP; Savino DA; Krakos PA; Farrell RS; Flamig DP
Radiology; 1996 Nov; 201(2):427-32. PubMed ID: 8888235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Sensitivity of mammography and ultrasonography on detecting abnormal findings of ductal carcinoma in situ.
Boonjunwetwatmd D; Chyutipraiwan U; Sampatanukul P; Chatamra K
J Med Assoc Thai; 2007 Mar; 90(3):539-45. PubMed ID: 17427533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. BI-RADS MRI enhancement characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ.
Rosen EL; Smith-Foley SA; DeMartini WB; Eby PR; Peacock S; Lehman CD
Breast J; 2007; 13(6):545-50. PubMed ID: 17983393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Breast carcinoma in situ in 167 women--incidence, mode of presentation, therapy and follow-up.
Ringberg A; Andersson I; Aspegren K; Linell F
Eur J Surg Oncol; 1991 Oct; 17(5):466-76. PubMed ID: 1657650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Sensitivity of imaging for multifocal-multicentric breast carcinoma.
Bozzini A; Renne G; Meneghetti L; Bandi G; Santos G; Vento AR; Menna S; Andrighetto S; Viale G; Cassano E; Bellomi M
BMC Cancer; 2008 Sep; 8():275. PubMed ID: 18826585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Screening ultrasonography revealed 15% of mammographically occult breast cancers.
Uchida K; Yamashita A; Kawase K; Kamiya K
Breast Cancer; 2008; 15(2):165-8. PubMed ID: 18224382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Ultrasound demonstration of mammographically detected microcalcifications.
Gufler H; Buitrago-Téllez CH; Madjar H; Allmann KH; Uhl M; Rohr-Reyes A
Acta Radiol; 2000 May; 41(3):217-21. PubMed ID: 10866074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The use of ultrasonography and digital mammography in women under 40 years with symptomatic breast cancer: a 7-year Irish experience.
Redmond CE; Healy GM; Murphy CF; O'Doherty A; Foster A
Ir J Med Sci; 2017 Feb; 186(1):63-67. PubMed ID: 27271165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A comparative study of breast-specific gamma imaging with the conventional imaging modality in breast cancer patients with dense breasts.
Kim BS; Moon BI; Cha ES
Ann Nucl Med; 2012 Dec; 26(10):823-9. PubMed ID: 22922890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Morphology and contrast enhancement of ductal carcinoma in situ in dynamic 1.0 T MR mammography].
Sittek H; Kessler M; Heuck AF; Bredl T; Perlet C; Künzer I; Lebeau A; Untch M; Reiser M
Rofo; 1997 Sep; 167(3):247-51. PubMed ID: 9376552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [The use of echography and US-guided percutaneous puncture in addition to mammography for the detection of malignant breast tumors].
Matricardi L; Lovati R; Nazzaro V; Guarneri A; Calzoni G; Gagliano E; Donato F
Radiol Med; 1992 Apr; 83(4):395-401. PubMed ID: 1318561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Ultrasound in the detection of breast cancer associated with isolated clustered microcalcifications, mammographically identified.
Ranieri E; D'Andrea MR; D'Alessio A; Bergomi S; Caprio G; Calabrese GB; Virno F
Anticancer Res; 1997; 17(4A):2831-5. PubMed ID: 9252725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The role of ultrasound in the surgical management of patients diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
Khakpour N; Zager JS; Yen T; Stephens T; Kuerer HM; Singletary ES; Ross MI; Hunt KK; Babiera GV
Breast J; 2006; 12(3):212-5. PubMed ID: 16684318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
