These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17486163)

  • 1. Accurate assessment of work done and power during a Wingate anaerobic test.
    Franklin KL; Gordon RS; Baker JS; Davies B
    Appl Physiol Nutr Metab; 2007 Apr; 32(2):225-32. PubMed ID: 17486163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Determination of aerobic work and power on a rope-braked cycle ergometer by direct measurement.
    Gordon RS; Franklin KL; Baker JS; Davies B
    Appl Physiol Nutr Metab; 2006 Aug; 31(4):392-7. PubMed ID: 16900228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mechanics of a rope-braked cycle ergometer flywheel and its use for physiological measurement.
    Franklin KL; Gordon RS; Baker JS; Davies B
    Res Sports Med; 2005; 13(4):331-44. PubMed ID: 16440507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the Monark Wingate ergometer by direct measurement of resistance and velocity.
    MacIntosh BR; Bryan SN; Rishaug P; Norris SR
    Can J Appl Physiol; 2001 Dec; 26(6):543-58. PubMed ID: 11842272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of different calculation methods of flywheel parameters on the Wingate Anaerobic Test.
    Coleman SG; Hale T
    Can J Appl Physiol; 1998 Aug; 23(4):409-17. PubMed ID: 9677437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing accuracy of measurements for a Wingate Test using the Taguchi method.
    Franklin KL; Gordon RS; Davies B; Baker JS
    Res Sports Med; 2008; 16(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 18373285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Correcting the Wingate test for changes in kinetic energy of the ergometer flywheel.
    Bassett DR
    Int J Sports Med; 1989 Dec; 10(6):446-9. PubMed ID: 2628365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validity and Reliability of the Lode Excalibur Sport Cycle Ergometer for the Wingate Anaerobic Test.
    Lunn WR; Axtell RS
    J Strength Cond Res; 2021 Oct; 35(10):2894-2901. PubMed ID: 31453946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inertial effects on mechanically braked Wingate power calculations.
    Reiser RF; Broker JP; Peterson ML
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2000 Sep; 32(9):1660-4. PubMed ID: 10994921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability and validity of the velotron racermate cycle ergometer to measure anaerobic power.
    Astorino TA; Cottrell T
    Int J Sports Med; 2012 Mar; 33(3):205-10. PubMed ID: 22187386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mechanically braked Wingate powers: agreement between SRM, corrected and conventional methods of measurement.
    Balmer J; Bird S; Davison RC; Doherty M; Smith P
    J Sports Sci; 2004 Jul; 22(7):661-7. PubMed ID: 15370497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Low sampling rates bias outcomes from the Wingate test.
    Santos EL; Novaes JS; Reis VM; Giannella-Neto A
    Int J Sports Med; 2010 Nov; 31(11):784-9. PubMed ID: 20812165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Maximal power and torque-velocity relationship on a cycle ergometer during the acceleration phase of a single all-out exercise.
    Seck D; Vandewalle H; Decrops N; Monod H
    Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol; 1995; 70(2):161-8. PubMed ID: 7768239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of Velotron chainring size on Wingate anaerobic test.
    Clark NW; Wagner DR; Heath EM
    J Sci Med Sport; 2018 Feb; 21(2):202-206. PubMed ID: 28807684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of peak power and short-term work capacity.
    MacIntosh BR; Rishaug P; Svedahl K
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2003 Feb; 88(6):572-9. PubMed ID: 12560957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimal loads for a 30-s maximal power cycle ergometer test using a stationary start.
    Vargas NT; Robergs RA; Klopp DM
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2015 May; 115(5):1087-94. PubMed ID: 25549787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Wingate anaerobic test's past and future and the compatibility of mechanically versus electro-magnetically braked cycle-ergometers.
    Dotan R
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2006 Sep; 98(1):113-6. PubMed ID: 16847675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of cycle ergometer type and sex on assessment of 30-second anaerobic capacity and power.
    Leicht AS; Sealey RM; Sinclair WH
    Int J Sports Med; 2011 Sep; 32(9):688-92. PubMed ID: 21618158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Physiologic and perceptual responses to exercise on a new cycle ergometer.
    Attaway R; Bartoli WP; Pate RR; Davis JM
    Can J Sport Sci; 1992 Mar; 17(1):56-9. PubMed ID: 1322770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does power indicate capacity? 30-s Wingate anaerobic test vs. maximal accumulated O2 deficit.
    Minahan C; Chia M; Inbar O
    Int J Sports Med; 2007 Oct; 28(10):836-43. PubMed ID: 17497577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.