124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17486718)
1. Canadian code of ethics and the prescription privilege debate.
McCrea S; Enman M; Pettifor J
Can Psychol; 1997 Feb; 38(1):49-1. PubMed ID: 17486718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prescription privileges for psychologists: a comprehensive review and critical analysis of current issues and controversies.
Lavoie KL; Barone S
CNS Drugs; 2006; 20(1):51-66. PubMed ID: 16396524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Re: Should psychologists be granted prescription privileges? A review of the prescription privilege debate for psychiatrists.
Sussman S
Can J Psychiatry; 2003 Aug; 48(7):497-8; author reply 498. PubMed ID: 12971024
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Re: Should psychologists be granted prescription privileges? A review of the prescription privilege debate for psychiatrists.
Litman LC
Can J Psychiatry; 2003 Aug; 48(7):496-7; author reply 497. PubMed ID: 12971023
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Should psychologists be granted prescription privileges? A review of the prescription privilege debate for psychiatrists.
Lavoie KL; Fleet RP
Can J Psychiatry; 2002 Jun; 47(5):443-9. PubMed ID: 12085679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Making ethical choices: a comprehensive decision-making model for Canadian psychologists.
Hadjistavropoulos T; Malloy DC
Can Psychol; 2000 May; 41(2):104-15. PubMed ID: 16440472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Ethical Principles of the Portuguese Psychologists: An Empirical Approach.
Ricou M; Sá E; Nunes R
J Med Philos; 2019 Jan; 44(1):109-131. PubMed ID: 30649450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Psychologists and prescription privileges.
Rychnovsky JD
Nurse Pract; 2000 Nov; 25(11):11-3. PubMed ID: 11107603
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. 2010 Amendments to the 2002 "Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct".
Am Psychol; 2010; 65(5):493. PubMed ID: 20642307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. When reviews attack: ethics, free speech, and the peer review process.
Hadjistavropoulos T; Bieling PJ
Can Psychol; 2000 Aug; 41(3):152-9. PubMed ID: 16440473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Concluding remarks on the debate about prescription privileges for psychologists.
Heiby EM
J Clin Psychol; 2002 Jun; 58(6):709-22. PubMed ID: 12007161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Ethical Principles of the Portuguese Psychologists: A Universal Dimension.
Ricou M; Sá E; Nunes R
J Med Philos; 2017 Apr; 42(2):199-213. PubMed ID: 28201749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Revision of Ethical Standard 3.04 of the "Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct" (2002, as amended 2010).
American Psychological Association
Am Psychol; 2016 Dec; 71(9):900. PubMed ID: 28032786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ethical principles of the American Psychological Association: an argument for philosophical and practical ranking.
Hadjistavropoulos T; Malloy DC
Ethics Behav; 1999; 9(2):127-40. PubMed ID: 11657203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The new CPA Code of Ethics for Canadian psychologists: an education and training perspective.
Eberlein L
Can Psychol; 1988 Apr; 29(2):206-12. PubMed ID: 11650860
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The APA Ethical Principles as a foundational competency: application to rehabilitation psychology.
Hanson SL; Kerkhoff TR
Rehabil Psychol; 2011 Aug; 56(3):219-30. PubMed ID: 21767038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ethics: virtue and politics in the science and practice of psychology.
Pettifor JL
Can Psychol; 1996 Feb; 37(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 12194189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ethical decision-making and the Code of Ethics of the Canadian Psychological Association.
Seitz J; O'Neill P
Can Psychol; 1996 Feb; 37(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 11654993
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Prescription privileges for psychologists: constituencies and conflicts.
Hayes SC; Walser RD; Bach P
J Clin Psychol; 2002 Jun; 58(6):697-708. PubMed ID: 12007160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Applying our medicine to the psychopharmacology debate.
Lorion RP
Am Psychol; 1996 Mar; 51(3):219-24. PubMed ID: 8881530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
