These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17486915)

  • 1. [Laparoscopic hysterectomy: technique, indications].
    Thoma V; Salvatores M; Mereu L; Chua I; Wattiez A
    Ann Urol (Paris); 2007 Apr; 41(2):80-90. PubMed ID: 17486915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of robotic and other minimally invasive routes of hysterectomy for benign indications.
    Swenson CW; Kamdar NS; Harris JA; Uppal S; Campbell DA; Morgan DM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):650.e1-650.e8. PubMed ID: 27343568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Surgical routes and complications of hysterectomy for benign disorders: a prospective observational study in French university hospitals.
    David-Montefiore E; Rouzier R; Chapron C; Daraï E;
    Hum Reprod; 2007 Jan; 22(1):260-5. PubMed ID: 16950826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perioperative complication rate in 1706 patients after a standardized laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy technique.
    Bojahr B; Raatz D; Schonleber G; Abri C; Ohlinger R
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(3):183-9. PubMed ID: 16698522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Laparoscopic Versus Open Hysterectomy for Benign Disease in Uteri Weighing >1 kg: A Retrospective Analysis on 258 Patients.
    Uccella S; Morosi C; Marconi N; Arrigo A; Gisone B; Casarin J; Pinelli C; Borghi C; Ghezzi F
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):62-69. PubMed ID: 28711761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of power morcellator removal on hysterectomy practice patterns.
    Wesol A; Woolley S
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Aug; 215():41-44. PubMed ID: 28599164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Morcellation Techniques at the Time of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy and Myomectomy.
    Meurs EAIM; Brito LG; Ajao MO; Goggins ER; Vitonis AF; Einarsson JI; Cohen SL
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(5):843-849. PubMed ID: 28483536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy with and without robotic assistance: a prospective controlled study.
    Martínez-Maestre MA; Gambadauro P; González-Cejudo C; Torrejón R
    Surg Innov; 2014 Jun; 21(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 23833240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [A review of 445 cases of laparoscopic hysterectomy: benefits and outcome].
    Malzoni M; Perniola G; Hannuna K; Iuele T; Fruscella ML; Basili R; Ebano V; Marziani R
    Clin Ter; 2004 Jan; 155(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 15147074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Uterine volume and vaginal hysterectomy: Interest and limits of uterine morcellation].
    Dubuisson J; Veit-Rubin N
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2016 Mar; 44(3):175-80. PubMed ID: 26966037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Laparoscopic hysterectomy.
    Wattiez A; Cohen SB; Selvaggi L
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Aug; 14(4):417-22. PubMed ID: 12151832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Indications of laparoscopic hysterectomy.
    De Meeus JB; Magnin G
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1997 Jul; 74(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 9243202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Systematic implementation of laparoscopic hysterectomy independent of uterus size: clinical effect.
    Uccella S; Cromi A; Bogani G; Casarin J; Formenti G; Ghezzi F
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(4):505-16. PubMed ID: 23870240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in Patients with Large Uteri: Comparison of Uterine Removal by Transvaginal and Uterine Morcellation Approaches.
    Wang H; Li P; Li X; Gao L; Lu C; Zhao J; Zhou AL
    Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():8784601. PubMed ID: 27419141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [A comparative analysis of hysterectomies].
    Aniuliene R; Varzgaliene L; Varzgalis M
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2007; 43(2):118-24. PubMed ID: 17329946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: a comparative study.
    Vaisbuch E; Goldchmit C; Ofer D; Agmon A; Hagay Z
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Jun; 126(2):234-8. PubMed ID: 16616408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy: Analysis of the surgical learning curve in benign conditions.
    Terzi H; Biler A; Demirtas O; Guler OT; Peker N; Kale A
    Int J Surg; 2016 Nov; 35():51-57. PubMed ID: 27633451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multicenter analysis comparing robotic, open, laparoscopic, and vaginal hysterectomies performed by high-volume surgeons for benign indications.
    Lim PC; Crane JT; English EJ; Farnam RW; Garza DM; Winter ML; Rozeboom JL
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Jun; 133(3):359-64. PubMed ID: 26952352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In-hospital complications of vaginal versus laparoscopic-assisted benign hysterectomy among older women: a propensity score-matched cohort study.
    Lai JC; Chen HH; Huang SM; Wang KL; Huang N; Hu HY; Chou YJ
    Menopause; 2016 Nov; 23(11):1233-1238. PubMed ID: 27465711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Practice patterns and postoperative complications before and after US Food and Drug Administration safety communication on power morcellation.
    Harris JA; Swenson CW; Uppal S; Kamdar N; Mahnert N; As-Sanie S; Morgan DM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jan; 214(1):98.e1-98.e13. PubMed ID: 26314519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.