585 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17487128)
1. Nerve-sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy at Siriraj Hospital.
Srinualnad S; Nualyong C
J Med Assoc Thai; 2007 Apr; 90(4):730-6. PubMed ID: 17487128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Early experience of robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Srinualnad S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Mar; 91(3):377-82. PubMed ID: 18575292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Age stratified functional outcomes after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Rogers CG; Su LM; Link RE; Sullivan W; Wagner A; Pavlovich CP
J Urol; 2006 Dec; 176(6 Pt 1):2448-52. PubMed ID: 17085126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bilateral vs unilateral laparoscopic intrafascial nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: evaluation of surgical and functional outcomes in 457 patients.
Greco F; Hoda MR; Wagner S; Reichelt O; Inferrera A; Magno C; Fornara P
BJU Int; 2011 Aug; 108(4):583-7. PubMed ID: 21091973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (EERPE): a new approach for treatment of localized prostate cancer.
Srinualnad S; Nualyong C; Udompunturak S; Kongsuwan W
J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Oct; 89(10):1601-8. PubMed ID: 17128833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is laparoscopic unilateral sural nerve grafting during radical prostatectomy effective in retaining sexual potency?
Porpiglia F; Ragni F; Terrone C; Renard J; Musso F; Grande S; Cracco C; Ghignone G; Scarpa RM
BJU Int; 2005 Jun; 95(9):1267-71. PubMed ID: 15892814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dissociation of sexual function and sexual bother following autologous sural nerve grafting during radical prostatectomy.
Kuwata Y; Muneuchi G; Igawa HH; Tsukuda F; Inui M; Kakehi Y
Int J Urol; 2007 Jun; 14(6):510-4. PubMed ID: 17593095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intraoperative frozen section analysis during nerve sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: feasibility study.
Fromont G; Baumert H; Cathelineau X; Rozet F; Validire P; Vallancien G
J Urol; 2003 Nov; 170(5):1843-6. PubMed ID: 14532789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of nerve sparing technique on patient self-assessed outcomes after radical perineal prostatectomy.
Kübler HR; Tseng TY; Sun L; Vieweg J; Harris MJ; Dahm P
J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):488-92; discussion 492. PubMed ID: 17561133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of transperitoneal and extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy using match-pair analysis.
Erdogru T; Teber D; Frede T; Marrero R; Hammady A; Seemann O; Rassweiler J
Eur Urol; 2004 Sep; 46(3):312-9; discussion 320. PubMed ID: 15306100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: preliminary result of Thailand series.
Nualyong C; Srinualnad S; Taweemonkongsap T; Amornvesukit T
J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Sep; 89(9):1440-6. PubMed ID: 17100382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Nerve-sparing techniques in open and laparoscopic prostatectomy.
Rodriguez E; Melamud O; Ahlering TE
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther; 2008 Mar; 8(3):475-9. PubMed ID: 18366294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of quality of life following laparoscopic and open prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
Hara I; Kawabata G; Miyake H; Nakamura I; Hara S; Okada H; Kamidono S
J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2045-8. PubMed ID: 12771715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparative study at a single institution.
Rassweiler J; Seemann O; Schulze M; Teber D; Hatzinger M; Frede T
J Urol; 2003 May; 169(5):1689-93. PubMed ID: 12686809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A direct comparison of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience.
Rozet F; Jaffe J; Braud G; Harmon J; Cathelineau X; Barret E; Vallancien G
J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):478-82. PubMed ID: 17561160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of statin therapy on early return of potency after nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Hong SK; Han BK; Jeong SJ; Byun SS; Lee SE
J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):613-6. PubMed ID: 17570410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of unilateral sural nerve graft on recovery of potency and continence following radical prostatectomy: 3-year longitudinal study.
Namiki S; Saito S; Nakagawa H; Sanada T; Yamada A; Arai Y
J Urol; 2007 Jul; 178(1):212-6; discussion 216. PubMed ID: 17499797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Nocturnal tumescence: a parameter for postoperative erectile integrity after nerve sparing radical prostatectomy.
Bannowsky A; Schulze H; van der Horst C; Seif C; Braun PM; Jünemann KP
J Urol; 2006 Jun; 175(6):2214-7. PubMed ID: 16697842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Modified clipless antegrade nerve preservation in robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with validated sexual function evaluation.
Chien GW; Mikhail AA; Orvieto MA; Zagaja GP; Sokoloff MH; Brendler CB; Shalhav AL
Urology; 2005 Aug; 66(2):419-23. PubMed ID: 16040100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in clinical T1a and T1b prostate cancer: oncologic and functional outcomes--a matched-pair analysis.
Teber D; Cresswell J; Ates M; Erdogru T; Hruza M; Gözen AS; Rassweiler J
Urology; 2009 Mar; 73(3):577-81. PubMed ID: 19100598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
