These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17487215)

  • 1. Parentage and sibship exclusions: higher statistical power with more family members.
    Wang J
    Heredity (Edinb); 2007 Aug; 99(2):205-17. PubMed ID: 17487215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of genotyping errors on parentage exclusion analysis.
    Wang J
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Nov; 19(22):5061-78. PubMed ID: 20964757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Parentage and sibship inference from markers in polyploids.
    Wang J; Scribner KT
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2014 May; 14(3):541-53. PubMed ID: 24299450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Parentage exclusion of close relatives in haplodiploid species.
    Wang J; Bourke AFG
    Theor Popul Biol; 2023 Dec; 154():40-50. PubMed ID: 37640113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Parentage and sibship inference from multilocus genotype data under polygamy.
    Wang J; Santure AW
    Genetics; 2009 Apr; 181(4):1579-94. PubMed ID: 19221199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Microsatellite null alleles in parentage analysis.
    Dakin EE; Avise JC
    Heredity (Edinb); 2004 Nov; 93(5):504-9. PubMed ID: 15292911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effectiveness of 10 polymorphic microsatellite markers for parentage and pedigree analysis in plateau pika (Ochotona curzoniae).
    Li K; Geng J; Qu J; Zhang Y; Hu S
    BMC Genet; 2010 Nov; 11():101. PubMed ID: 21062500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Recent development of allele frequencies and exclusion probabilities of microsatellites used for parentage control in the German Holstein Friesian cattle population.
    Brenig B; Schütz E
    BMC Genet; 2016 Jan; 17():18. PubMed ID: 26747197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The power of single-nucleotide polymorphisms for large-scale parentage inference.
    Anderson EC; Garza JC
    Genetics; 2006 Apr; 172(4):2567-82. PubMed ID: 16387880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Parentage and kinship studies in an obligate brood parasitic bird, the brown-headed cowbird (Molothrus ater), using microsatellite DNA markers.
    Alderson GW; Gibbs HL; Sealy SG
    J Hered; 1999; 90(1):182-90. PubMed ID: 9987928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pedigree reconstruction from poor quality genotype data.
    Wang J
    Heredity (Edinb); 2019 Jun; 122(6):719-728. PubMed ID: 30631146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genotype probabilities of pairs of individuals for X-chromosome markers.
    Toni C; Domenici R; Presciuttini S
    Transfusion; 2007 Jul; 47(7):1276-80. PubMed ID: 17581164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Exclusion and Genomic Relatedness Methods for Assignment of Parentage Using Genotyping-by-Sequencing Data.
    Dodds KG; McEwan JC; Brauning R; van Stijn TC; Rowe SJ; McEwan KM; Clarke SM
    G3 (Bethesda); 2019 Oct; 9(10):3239-3247. PubMed ID: 31383721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effectiveness of using co-dominant polymorphic allelic series for (1) checking pedigrees and (2) distinguishing full-sib pair members.
    Jamieson A
    Anim Genet; 1994 Jun; 25 Suppl 1():37-44. PubMed ID: 7943982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparisons of three probability formulae for parentage exclusion.
    Jamieson A; Taylor SC
    Anim Genet; 1997 Dec; 28(6):397-400. PubMed ID: 9616104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimal weighting scheme for affected sib-pair analysis of sibship data.
    Sham PC; Zhao JH; Curtis D
    Ann Hum Genet; 1997 Jan; 61(Pt 1):61-9. PubMed ID: 9066928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Parentage testing in alpacas (Vicugna pacos) using semi-automated fluorescent multiplex PCRs with 10 microsatellite markers.
    Agapito J; Rodríguez J; Herrera-Velit P; Timoteo O; Rojas P; Boettcher PJ; García F; Espinoza JR
    Anim Genet; 2008 Apr; 39(2):201-3. PubMed ID: 18261186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing the performance of analytical techniques for genetic PARENTAGE of half-sib progeny arrays.
    Croshaw DA; Peters MB; Glenn TC
    Genet Res (Camb); 2009 Oct; 91(5):313-25. PubMed ID: 19922695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gametic phase disequilibrium between the syntenic multiallelic HTG4 and HMS3 markers widely used for parentage testing in Thoroughbred horses.
    Machado FB; de Vasconcellos Machado L; Bydlowski CR; Bydlowski SP; Medina-Acosta E
    Mol Biol Rep; 2012 Feb; 39(2):1447-52. PubMed ID: 21607619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analytical and statistical consideration on the use of the ISAG-ICAR-SNP bovine panel for parentage control, using the Illumina BeadChip technology: example on the German Holstein population.
    Schütz E; Brenig B
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):3. PubMed ID: 25651826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.