These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1748867)

  • 41. A degrading proteinase test to distinguish benign and virulent ovine isolates of Bacteroides nodosus.
    Depiazzi LJ; Richards RB
    Aust Vet J; 1979 Jan; 55(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 435206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Amplification of acidic protease virulence gene (aprV2) in samples from footrot lesions did not help in diagnosis of clinical virulent footrot in affected sheep flocks in New South Wales.
    Collins AM; Bowring BG
    Aust Vet J; 2020 Jul; 98(7):298-304. PubMed ID: 32215910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The detection of Dichelobacter nodosus and Fusobacterium necrophorum from ovine footrot in Kashmir, India.
    Farooq S; Wani SA; Hassan MN; Nazir N; Nyrah QJ
    Anaerobe; 2015 Oct; 35(Pt B):41-3. PubMed ID: 26159406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Dichelobacter nodosus, Fusobacterium necrophorum and the epidemiology of footrot.
    Bennett G; Hickford J; Sedcole R; Zhou H
    Anaerobe; 2009 Aug; 15(4):173-6. PubMed ID: 19239925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Sample pooling for real-time PCR detection and virulence determination of the footrot pathogen Dichelobacter nodosus.
    Frosth S; König U; Nyman AK; Aspán A
    Vet Res Commun; 2017 Sep; 41(3):189-193. PubMed ID: 28343363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A role for DNA characterisation in ovine footrot.
    McGillivery DJ; Webber JJ; Toohey LA
    Aust Vet J; 1989 Apr; 66(4):106-8. PubMed ID: 2730474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Isolation of the gene encoding pilin of Bacteroides nodosus (strain 198), the causal organism of ovine footrot.
    Elleman TC; Hoyne PA; Emery DL; Stewart DJ; Clark BL
    FEBS Lett; 1984 Jul; 173(1):103-7. PubMed ID: 6146535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Comparative antigenic analysis of extracellular proteins of Bacteroides nodosus isolated from virulent and benign ovine footrot.
    Yong WK; Gordon LM
    Vet Microbiol; 1986 Jul; 12(2):135-45. PubMed ID: 3529606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Delineation of the virulence-related locus (vrl) of Dichelobacter nodosus.
    Haring V; Billington SJ; Wright CL; Huggins AS; Katz ME; Rood JI
    Microbiology (Reading); 1995 Sep; 141 ( Pt 9)():2081-9. PubMed ID: 7496519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Comparative study of biochemical methods for the identification of Dichelobacter nodosus.
    Jiménez R; Píriz S; Mateos EM; Vadillo S
    Acta Vet Hung; 2004; 52(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 15379442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Transformation-mediated serogroup conversion of Dichelobacter nodosus.
    Kennan RM; Dhungyel OP; Whittington RJ; Egerton JR; Rood JI
    Vet Microbiol; 2003 Mar; 92(1-2):169-78. PubMed ID: 12488080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The type IV fimbrial subunit gene (fimA) of Dichelobacter nodosus is essential for virulence, protease secretion, and natural competence.
    Kennan RM; Dhungyel OP; Whittington RJ; Egerton JR; Rood JI
    J Bacteriol; 2001 Aug; 183(15):4451-8. PubMed ID: 11443078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Non-specificity of primers used for PCR based serogrouping of Dichelobacter nodosus and identification of a novel D. nodosus strain.
    Bhat MA; Wani SA; Muzafar M; Rather MA; Taku AK; Khandey F
    Anaerobe; 2013 Jun; 21():58-61. PubMed ID: 23542117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Molecular detection and characterization of Dichelobacter nodosus in ovine footrot in India.
    Wani SA; Samanta I; Bhat MA; Buchh AS
    Mol Cell Probes; 2004 Oct; 18(5):289-91. PubMed ID: 15294315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The pathogenesis of ovine footrot.
    Kennan RM; Han X; Porter CJ; Rood JI
    Vet Microbiol; 2011 Nov; 153(1-2):59-66. PubMed ID: 21596496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Prevalence of
    Storms J; Wirth A; Vasiliadis D; Brodard I; Hamann-Thölken A; Ambros C; Moog U; Jores J; Kuhnert P; Distl O
    Animals (Basel); 2021 Apr; 11(4):. PubMed ID: 33921469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Isolation and characterization of Dichelobacter nodosus from ovine and caprine footrot in Kashmir, India.
    Wani SA; Samanta I; Kawoosa S
    Res Vet Sci; 2007 Oct; 83(2):141-4. PubMed ID: 17250860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Survival of the ovine footrot pathogen Dichelobacter nodosus in different soils.
    Muzafar M; Green LE; Calvo-Bado LA; Tichauer E; King H; James P; Wellington EMH
    Anaerobe; 2016 Apr; 38():81-87. PubMed ID: 26746387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Experimental evaluation of a commercial footrot vaccine against native Canadian strains of Dichelobacter nodosus.
    Morck DW; Gard MS; Olson ME
    Can J Vet Res; 1994 Apr; 58(2):122-6. PubMed ID: 8004537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Diagnostic sampling strategies for virulent ovine footrot: simulating detection of Dichelobacter nodosus serogroups for bivalent vaccine formulation.
    Hill AE; Dhungyel OP; Whittington RJ
    Prev Vet Med; 2010 Jun; 95(1-2):127-36. PubMed ID: 20303191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.