2425 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17488997)
1. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
Marşan G
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Long-term stability of dentoalveolar and skeletal changes after activator-headgear treatment.
Lerstøl M; Torget O; Vandevska-Radunovic V
Eur J Orthod; 2010 Feb; 32(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 19477971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dentoskeletal effects and facial profile changes during activator therapy.
Cozza P; De Toffol L; Colagrossi S
Eur J Orthod; 2004 Jun; 26(3):293-302. PubMed ID: 15222715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and cervical headgear appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
de Oliveira JN; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Rodrigues de Almeida M; de Oliveira JN
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 17628251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Turkish female Class III patients.
Marşan G; Cura N; Emekli U
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 18786833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative evaluation of a new removable Jasper Jumper functional appliance vs an activator-headgear combination.
Sari Z; Goyenc Y; Doruk C; Usumez S
Angle Orthod; 2003 Jun; 73(3):286-93. PubMed ID: 12828437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of treatment with a combined maxillary protraction and chincap appliance in skeletal Class III patients with different vertical skeletal morphologies.
Yoshida I; Shoji T; Mizoguchi I
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):126-33. PubMed ID: 17218717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of activator and activator headgear treatment: comparison with untreated Class II subjects.
Türkkahraman H; Sayin MO
Eur J Orthod; 2006 Feb; 28(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 16093256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An evaluation of maxillary and mandibular rotational responses with the Clark twin block appliance.
Lau EY; Sampson WJ; Townsend GC; Hughes T
Aust Orthod J; 2009 May; 25(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 19634464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Treatment of Class II open bite in the mixed dentition with a removable functional appliance and headgear.
Ngan P; Wilson S; Florman M; Wei SH
Quintessence Int; 1992 May; 23(5):323-33. PubMed ID: 1502307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Effects of activator and activator + anterior high-pull headgear on the growth direction of Class 2 cases].
Uner O; Akkaya S; Buyruk F
Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1989 Apr; 2(1):92-102. PubMed ID: 2489150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Changes in soft tissue profile after mandibular setback surgery in Class III subjects.
Marşan G; Oztaş E; Kuvat SV; Cura N; Emekli U
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 38(3):236-40. PubMed ID: 19153028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Initial and late treatment effects of headgear-Herbst appliance with mandibular step-by-step advancement.
Hägg U; Du X; Rabie AB
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Nov; 122(5):477-85. PubMed ID: 12439475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the effects of Twin Block and activator treatment on the soft tissue profile.
Varlik SK; Gültan A; Tümer N
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Apr; 30(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 18281262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Skeletal and dental components of Class II correction with the bionator and removable headgear splint appliances.
Martins RP; da Rosa Martins JC; Martins LP; Buschang PH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 19061799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of double-plate appliance and facemask therapy in treating Class III malocclusions.
Ucem TT; Ucuncü N; Yüksel S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Dec; 126(6):672-9. PubMed ID: 15592214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Stability of Class II treatment with an edgewise crowned Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition: Skeletal and dental changes.
Wigal TG; Dischinger T; Martin C; Razmus T; Gunel E; Ngan P
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Aug; 140(2):210-23. PubMed ID: 21803259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Skeletal and dental effects of a mini maxillary protraction appliance.
Altug Z; Arslan AD
Angle Orthod; 2006 May; 76(3):360-8. PubMed ID: 16637712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Short-term skeletal and dental effects of the Xbow appliance as measured on lateral cephalograms.
Flores-Mir C; Barnett G; Higgins DW; Heo G; Major PW
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Dec; 136(6):822-32. PubMed ID: 19962605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effects of maxillary protraction and its long-term stability--a clinical trial in Chinese adolescents.
Chen L; Chen R; Yang Y; Ji G; Shen G
Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb; 34(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 21325335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
