These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1748920)

  • 1. Future dimensions in vascular access--peripheral implantable ports.
    McKee J
    J Intraven Nurs; 1991; 14(6):387-93. PubMed ID: 1748920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. New implantable device for long-term vascular access in children.
    Reinberg O; Beck D
    Eur J Pediatr Surg; 1992 Jun; 2(3):183-5. PubMed ID: 1498114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A trial with a new peripheral implanted vascular access device.
    Winters V; Peters B; Coilá S; Jones L
    Oncol Nurs Forum; 1990; 17(6):891-6. PubMed ID: 2263515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radiologic placement of a low profile implantable venous access port in a pediatric population.
    Nosher JL; Bodner LJ; Ettinger LJ; Siegel RL; Gribbin C; Asch J; Drachtman RA
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2001; 24(6):395-9. PubMed ID: 11907746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Port navigation: let the journey begin.
    Arch P
    Clin J Oncol Nurs; 2007 Aug; 11(4):485-8. PubMed ID: 17723960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of totally implanted reservoirs with external catheters as venous access devices in pediatric oncologic patients.
    Ross MN; Haase GM; Poole MA; Burrington JD; Odom LF
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1988 Aug; 167(2):141-4. PubMed ID: 3400032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Central venous access devices in treatment of patients with malignant tumors: venous port, central venous catheter and Hickman catheter. Cost-benefit analysis based on a critical review of the literature, personal experiences with 135 port implantations and patient attitude].
    Krupski G; Fröschle GW; Weh FJ; Schlosser GA
    Chirurg; 1995 Mar; 66(3):202-7. PubMed ID: 7750390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Make the right choice of vascular access device.
    Cowley K
    Prof Nurse; 2004 Jun; 19(10):43-6. PubMed ID: 15233073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Complications associated with an implantable vascular access device.
    Dillon PA; Foglia RP
    J Pediatr Surg; 2006 Sep; 41(9):1582-7. PubMed ID: 16952595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Vascular access in oncology patients.
    Gallieni M; Pittiruti M; Biffi R
    CA Cancer J Clin; 2008; 58(6):323-46. PubMed ID: 18971486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Peripheral ports are a new option for central venous access.
    Schuman E; Ragsdale J
    J Am Coll Surg; 1995 Apr; 180(4):456-60. PubMed ID: 7719550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. PAS-Port: a new implantable vascular access device for arm placement: experiences from the first two years.
    Lundberg G; Wahlberg E; Rickberg A; Olofsson P
    Eur J Surg; 1995 May; 161(5):323-6. PubMed ID: 7662775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-term experience with a totally implanted catheter system in gynecologic oncologic patients.
    Koonings PP; Given FT
    J Am Coll Surg; 1994 Feb; 178(2):164-6. PubMed ID: 8173727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Insertion and management of long-term central venous devices: role of radiologic imaging techniques].
    Capaccioli L; Nistri M; Distante V; Rontini M; Manetti A; Stecco A
    Radiol Med; 1998 Oct; 96(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 9972217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Seat belt associated central line fracture--a previously unreported complication in cystic fibrosis.
    Ghayyda SN; Roland D; Cade A
    J Cyst Fibros; 2008 Sep; 7(5):448-9. PubMed ID: 18455967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Daily access of implanted venous ports. Implications for patient education.
    Viall CD
    J Intraven Nurs; 1990; 13(5):294-6. PubMed ID: 2119424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do central venous catheters have advantages over arteriovenous fistulas or grafts?
    Quarello F; Forneris G; Borca M; Pozzato M
    J Nephrol; 2006; 19(3):265-79. PubMed ID: 16874685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nurse and patient satisfaction with three types of venous access devices.
    Dearborn P; De Muth JS; Requarth AB; Ward SE
    Oncol Nurs Forum; 1997; 24(1 Suppl):34-40. PubMed ID: 9010863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Options for venous access in ambulatory care: issues in selection and management.
    Herbst SL
    J Infus Chemother; 1996; 6(4):186-94. PubMed ID: 9229314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Subcutaneous chamber systems (ports) for long-term care in cancer patients].
    Hájek R; Sevcík P; Ondrásek J; Mayer J; Vásová I; Král Z; Tomíska M; Krahulcová E; Penka M; Kubesová H
    Vnitr Lek; 1995 Jan; 41(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 7716888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.