BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1748920)

  • 1. Future dimensions in vascular access--peripheral implantable ports.
    McKee J
    J Intraven Nurs; 1991; 14(6):387-93. PubMed ID: 1748920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. New implantable device for long-term vascular access in children.
    Reinberg O; Beck D
    Eur J Pediatr Surg; 1992 Jun; 2(3):183-5. PubMed ID: 1498114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A trial with a new peripheral implanted vascular access device.
    Winters V; Peters B; Coilá S; Jones L
    Oncol Nurs Forum; 1990; 17(6):891-6. PubMed ID: 2263515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radiologic placement of a low profile implantable venous access port in a pediatric population.
    Nosher JL; Bodner LJ; Ettinger LJ; Siegel RL; Gribbin C; Asch J; Drachtman RA
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2001; 24(6):395-9. PubMed ID: 11907746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Port navigation: let the journey begin.
    Arch P
    Clin J Oncol Nurs; 2007 Aug; 11(4):485-8. PubMed ID: 17723960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of totally implanted reservoirs with external catheters as venous access devices in pediatric oncologic patients.
    Ross MN; Haase GM; Poole MA; Burrington JD; Odom LF
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1988 Aug; 167(2):141-4. PubMed ID: 3400032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Central venous access devices in treatment of patients with malignant tumors: venous port, central venous catheter and Hickman catheter. Cost-benefit analysis based on a critical review of the literature, personal experiences with 135 port implantations and patient attitude].
    Krupski G; Fröschle GW; Weh FJ; Schlosser GA
    Chirurg; 1995 Mar; 66(3):202-7. PubMed ID: 7750390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Make the right choice of vascular access device.
    Cowley K
    Prof Nurse; 2004 Jun; 19(10):43-6. PubMed ID: 15233073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Complications associated with an implantable vascular access device.
    Dillon PA; Foglia RP
    J Pediatr Surg; 2006 Sep; 41(9):1582-7. PubMed ID: 16952595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Vascular access in oncology patients.
    Gallieni M; Pittiruti M; Biffi R
    CA Cancer J Clin; 2008; 58(6):323-46. PubMed ID: 18971486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Peripheral ports are a new option for central venous access.
    Schuman E; Ragsdale J
    J Am Coll Surg; 1995 Apr; 180(4):456-60. PubMed ID: 7719550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. PAS-Port: a new implantable vascular access device for arm placement: experiences from the first two years.
    Lundberg G; Wahlberg E; Rickberg A; Olofsson P
    Eur J Surg; 1995 May; 161(5):323-6. PubMed ID: 7662775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-term experience with a totally implanted catheter system in gynecologic oncologic patients.
    Koonings PP; Given FT
    J Am Coll Surg; 1994 Feb; 178(2):164-6. PubMed ID: 8173727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Insertion and management of long-term central venous devices: role of radiologic imaging techniques].
    Capaccioli L; Nistri M; Distante V; Rontini M; Manetti A; Stecco A
    Radiol Med; 1998 Oct; 96(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 9972217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Seat belt associated central line fracture--a previously unreported complication in cystic fibrosis.
    Ghayyda SN; Roland D; Cade A
    J Cyst Fibros; 2008 Sep; 7(5):448-9. PubMed ID: 18455967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Daily access of implanted venous ports. Implications for patient education.
    Viall CD
    J Intraven Nurs; 1990; 13(5):294-6. PubMed ID: 2119424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do central venous catheters have advantages over arteriovenous fistulas or grafts?
    Quarello F; Forneris G; Borca M; Pozzato M
    J Nephrol; 2006; 19(3):265-79. PubMed ID: 16874685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nurse and patient satisfaction with three types of venous access devices.
    Dearborn P; De Muth JS; Requarth AB; Ward SE
    Oncol Nurs Forum; 1997; 24(1 Suppl):34-40. PubMed ID: 9010863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Options for venous access in ambulatory care: issues in selection and management.
    Herbst SL
    J Infus Chemother; 1996; 6(4):186-94. PubMed ID: 9229314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Subcutaneous chamber systems (ports) for long-term care in cancer patients].
    Hájek R; Sevcík P; Ondrásek J; Mayer J; Vásová I; Král Z; Tomíska M; Krahulcová E; Penka M; Kubesová H
    Vnitr Lek; 1995 Jan; 41(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 7716888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.