These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17489290)

  • 1. Task interference from event-based intentions can be material specific.
    Marsh RL; Cook GI; Hicks JL
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Dec; 34(8):1636-43. PubMed ID: 17489290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is task interference in event-based prospective memory dependent on cue presentation?
    Loft S; Kearney R; Remington R
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Jan; 36(1):139-48. PubMed ID: 18323070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Task interference from prospective memories covaries with contextual associations of fulfilling them.
    Marsh RL; Hicks JL; Cook GI
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Jul; 34(5):1037-45. PubMed ID: 17128602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prospective memory and task interference in a continuous monitoring dynamic display task.
    Loft S; Remington RW
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2010 Jun; 16(2):145-57. PubMed ID: 20565199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Learning is impaired by activated intentions.
    Cook GI; Marsh RL; Clark-Foos A; Meeks JT
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2007 Feb; 14(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 17546738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The cost of remembering to remember in event-based prospective memory: investigating the capacity demands of delayed intention performance.
    Smith RE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 May; 29(3):347-61. PubMed ID: 12776746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Memory for intention-related material presented in a to-be-ignored channel.
    Marsh RL; Cook GI; Meeks JT; Clark-Foos A; Hicks JL
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Sep; 35(6):1197-204. PubMed ID: 18035620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The intention interference effect.
    Cohen AL; Kantner J; Dixon RA; Lindsay DS
    Exp Psychol; 2011; 58(6):425-33. PubMed ID: 21592940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the relationship between effort toward an ongoing task and cue detection in event-based prospective memory.
    Marsh RL; Hicks JL; Cook GI
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Jan; 31(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 15641905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of action coordination for prospective memory: Task-interruption demands affect intention realization.
    Rummel J; Wesslein AK; Meiser T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 May; 43(5):717-735. PubMed ID: 27736115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dealing with prospective memory demands while performing an ongoing task: Shared processing, increased on-task focus, or both?
    Rummel J; Smeekens BA; Kane MJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Jul; 43(7):1047-1062. PubMed ID: 27936845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prospective memory in context: Moving through a familiar space.
    Smith RE; Hunt RR; Murray AE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Feb; 43(2):189-204. PubMed ID: 27504679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prior task experience and comparable stimulus exposure nullify focal and nonfocal prospective memory retrieval differences.
    Hicks JL; Franks BA; Spitler SN
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Oct; 70(10):1997-2006. PubMed ID: 27461749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Concurrent performance of two memory tasks: evidence for domain-specific working memory systems.
    Cocchini G; Logie RH; Della Sala S; MacPherson SE; Baddeley AD
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Oct; 30(7):1086-95. PubMed ID: 12507373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is it relevant? Influence of trial manipulations of prospective memory context on task interference.
    Lourenço JS; Maylor EA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(4):687-702. PubMed ID: 23971415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detecting event-based prospective memory cues occurring within and outside the focus of attention.
    Hicks JL; Cook GI; Marsh RL
    Am J Psychol; 2005; 118(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 15822607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Divided attention interferes with fulfilling activity-based intentions.
    Brewer GA; Ball BH; Knight JB; Dewitt MR; Marsh RL
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Sep; 138(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 21704959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Context-specific prospective-memory processing: evidence for flexible attention allocation adjustments after intention encoding.
    Kuhlmann BG; Rummel J
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Aug; 42(6):943-9. PubMed ID: 24590428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Flexible attention allocation dynamically impacts incidental encoding in prospective memory.
    Guevara Pinto JD; Papesh MH; Hicks JL
    Mem Cognit; 2022 Jan; 50(1):112-128. PubMed ID: 34184211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An observation on the spontaneous noticing of prospective memory event-based cues.
    Knight JB; Meeks JT; Marsh RL; Cook GI; Brewer GA; Hicks JL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Mar; 37(2):298-307. PubMed ID: 21299328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.