These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17489626)

  • 1. How sensitive are nanosecond molecular dynamics simulations of proteins to changes in the force field?
    Villa A; Fan H; Wassenaar T; Mark AE
    J Phys Chem B; 2007 May; 111(21):6015-25. PubMed ID: 17489626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modern protein force fields behave comparably in molecular dynamics simulations.
    Price DJ; Brooks CL
    J Comput Chem; 2002 Aug; 23(11):1045-57. PubMed ID: 12116391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A biomolecular force field based on the free enthalpy of hydration and solvation: the GROMOS force-field parameter sets 53A5 and 53A6.
    Oostenbrink C; Villa A; Mark AE; van Gunsteren WF
    J Comput Chem; 2004 Oct; 25(13):1656-76. PubMed ID: 15264259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Force field evaluation for biomolecular simulation: free enthalpies of solvation of polar and apolar compounds in various solvents.
    Geerke DP; van Gunsteren WF
    Chemphyschem; 2006 Mar; 7(3):671-8. PubMed ID: 16514695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. CHARMM fluctuating charge force field for proteins: II protein/solvent properties from molecular dynamics simulations using a nonadditive electrostatic model.
    Patel S; Mackerell AD; Brooks CL
    J Comput Chem; 2004 Sep; 25(12):1504-14. PubMed ID: 15224394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An improved nucleic acid parameter set for the GROMOS force field.
    Soares TA; Hünenberger PH; Kastenholz MA; Kräutler V; Lenz T; Lins RD; Oostenbrink C; van Gunsteren WF
    J Comput Chem; 2005 May; 26(7):725-37. PubMed ID: 15770662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Refining the description of peptide backbone conformations improves protein simulations using the GROMOS 53A6 force field.
    Cao Z; Lin Z; Wang J; Liu H
    J Comput Chem; 2009 Mar; 30(4):645-60. PubMed ID: 18780355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A new force field (ECEPP-05) for peptides, proteins, and organic molecules.
    Arnautova YA; Jagielska A; Scheraga HA
    J Phys Chem B; 2006 Mar; 110(10):5025-44. PubMed ID: 16526746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ab initio protein structure prediction with force field parameters derived from water-phase quantum chemical calculation.
    Katagiri D; Fuji H; Neya S; Hoshino T
    J Comput Chem; 2008 Sep; 29(12):1930-44. PubMed ID: 18366016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using PC clusters to evaluate the transferability of molecular mechanics force fields for proteins.
    Okur A; Strockbine B; Hornak V; Simmerling C
    J Comput Chem; 2003 Jan; 24(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 12483672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Molecular dynamics study of the solvation of an alpha-helical transmembrane peptide by DMSO.
    Duarte AM; van Mierlo CP; Hemminga MA
    J Phys Chem B; 2008 Jul; 112(29):8664-71. PubMed ID: 18582096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Structure of large nitrate-water clusters at ambient temperatures: simulations with effective fragment potentials and force fields with implications for atmospheric chemistry.
    Miller Y; Thomas JL; Kemp DD; Finlayson-Pitts BJ; Gordon MS; Tobias DJ; Gerber RB
    J Phys Chem A; 2009 Nov; 113(46):12805-14. PubMed ID: 19817362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Probing polar solvation dynamics in proteins: a molecular dynamics simulation analysis.
    Golosov AA; Karplus M
    J Phys Chem B; 2007 Feb; 111(6):1482-90. PubMed ID: 17249715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Simulation of NMR data reveals that proteins' local structures are stabilized by electronic polarization.
    Tong Y; Ji CG; Mei Y; Zhang JZ
    J Am Chem Soc; 2009 Jun; 131(24):8636-41. PubMed ID: 19485377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of various implicit solvent models in molecular dynamics simulations of immunoglobulin G light chain dimer.
    Król M
    J Comput Chem; 2003 Apr; 24(5):531-46. PubMed ID: 12632469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conformation, dynamics, solvation and relative stabilities of selected beta-hexopyranoses in water: a molecular dynamics study with the GROMOS 45A4 force field.
    Kräutler V; Müller M; Hünenberger PH
    Carbohydr Res; 2007 Oct; 342(14):2097-124. PubMed ID: 17573054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Protein flexibility: multiple molecular dynamics simulations of insulin chain B.
    Legge FS; Budi A; Treutlein H; Yarovsky I
    Biophys Chem; 2006 Jan; 119(2):146-57. PubMed ID: 16129550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Why the OPLS-AA force field cannot produce the β-hairpin structure of H1 peptide in solution when comparing with the GROMOS 43A1 force field?
    Cao Z; Liu L; Wang J
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2011 Dec; 29(3):527-39. PubMed ID: 22066538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rational design of ion force fields based on thermodynamic solvation properties.
    Horinek D; Mamatkulov SI; Netz RR
    J Chem Phys; 2009 Mar; 130(12):124507. PubMed ID: 19334851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of implicit solvent models for the simulation of protein-surface interactions.
    Sun Y; Latour RA
    J Comput Chem; 2006 Dec; 27(16):1908-22. PubMed ID: 17019723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.