These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1749125)

  • 21. Accuracy of temporal coding: auditory-visual comparisons.
    Schab FR; Crowder RG
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Jul; 17(4):384-97. PubMed ID: 2761399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The neural basis of visual dominance in the context of audio-visual object processing.
    Schmid C; Büchel C; Rose M
    Neuroimage; 2011 Mar; 55(1):304-11. PubMed ID: 21112404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cross-modal activation of auditory regions during visuo-spatial working memory in early deafness.
    Ding H; Qin W; Liang M; Ming D; Wan B; Li Q; Yu C
    Brain; 2015 Sep; 138(Pt 9):2750-65. PubMed ID: 26070981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Memory as embodiment: The case of modality and serial short-term memory.
    Macken B; Taylor JC; Kozlov MD; Hughes RW; Jones DM
    Cognition; 2016 Oct; 155():113-124. PubMed ID: 27376662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Latency of modality-specific reactivation of auditory and visual information during episodic memory retrieval.
    Ueno D; Masumoto K; Sutani K; Iwaki S
    Neuroreport; 2015 Apr; 26(6):303-8. PubMed ID: 25756907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Differential effects of auditory and visual signals on clock speed and temporal memory.
    Penney TB; Gibbon J; Meck WH
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2000 Dec; 26(6):1770-87. PubMed ID: 11129373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The impact of order incongruence between a task-irrelevant auditory sequence and a task-relevant visual sequence.
    Hughes RW; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Apr; 31(2):316-27. PubMed ID: 15826233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Modality differences in relation to grouping in immediate recall.
    Broadbent DE; Cooper PJ; Frankish CR; Broadbent MH
    Br J Psychol; 1980 Nov; 71(Pt 4):475-85. PubMed ID: 7437672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. When audition dominates vision: evidence from cross-modal statistical learning.
    Robinson CW; Sloutsky VM
    Exp Psychol; 2013; 60(2):113-21. PubMed ID: 23047918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Deficit of explicit memory in Parkinson's disease demonstrated by auditory-verbal and visual-design learning tasks].
    Maruyama T
    Nihon Rinsho; 1997 Jan; 55(1):195-201. PubMed ID: 9014449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of modality in earwitness identification: memory for verbal and nonverbal auditory stimuli presented in two contexts.
    Huss MT; Weaver KA
    J Gen Psychol; 1996 Oct; 123(4):277-87. PubMed ID: 9042739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Single-trial multisensory memories affect later auditory and visual object discrimination.
    Thelen A; Talsma D; Murray MM
    Cognition; 2015 May; 138():148-60. PubMed ID: 25743256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Visual, auditory, and cross-modality dual-task costs: electrophysiological evidence for an amodal bottleneck on working memory consolidation.
    Arnell KM
    Percept Psychophys; 2006 Apr; 68(3):447-57. PubMed ID: 16900836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Multiple interactive memory representations underlie the induction of false memory.
    Zhu B; Chen C; Shao X; Liu W; Ye Z; Zhuang L; Zheng L; Loftus EF; Xue G
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Feb; 116(9):3466-3475. PubMed ID: 30765524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of word meaningfulness on primary and secondary memory.
    Rae G
    J Gen Psychol; 1979 Oct; 101(2d Half,):175-81. PubMed ID: 533843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The perceptual nature of the cross-modal priming effect: arguments in favor of a sensory-based conception of memory.
    Vallet G; Brunel L; Versace R
    Exp Psychol; 2010; 57(5):376-82. PubMed ID: 20178946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Dual-mode presentation and its effect on implicit and explicit memory.
    David P; Hirshman E
    Am J Psychol; 1998; 111(1):77-87. PubMed ID: 9624704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Word recall as a function of bisensory and unisensory split-span task presentation and modality preferences.
    Smith CK; Everett FL; Westendorf DH
    Percept Mot Skills; 1978 Oct; 47(2):539-46. PubMed ID: 724392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Role of stimulus modality in rating ordinary and derived word strings.
    Finkler D
    Percept Mot Skills; 1975 Apr; 40(2):495-501. PubMed ID: 1178320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Coding processes in normal and learning-disabled children: evidence for modality-specific pathways to the cognitive system.
    Ceci SJ; Lea SE; Ringstrom MD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1980 Nov; 6(6):785-97. PubMed ID: 7441190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.