These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17491476)
1. Reading the abortion ruling. Tolson J US News World Rep; 2007 Apr; 142(15):36. PubMed ID: 17491476 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Abortion wars, once again. The case being argued this week before the Supreme Court may determine just how far state restrictions can go. Halloran L US News World Rep; 2005 Dec; 139(21):29-30. PubMed ID: 16389673 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Forgotten Supreme Court abortion cases: Drs. Hawker and Hurwitz in the deck and defrocked. Lucas R Pepperdine Law Rev; 2003 May; 30(4):641-70. PubMed ID: 15237509 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Casey and its impact on abortion regulation. Moses MF Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):805-15. PubMed ID: 16700123 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. When the shouting has to stop: America and abortion. Economist; 1992 Apr; 323(7756):15-6. PubMed ID: 16001469 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Inverting the viability test for abortion law. Ching B Womens Rights Law Report; 2000; 22(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 16281341 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. No to abortion: posture, not policy. O'Brien D America (NY); 2005 May; 192(19):7-9. PubMed ID: 16175695 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Government in medicine. Drazen JM N Engl J Med; 2007 May; 356(21):2195. PubMed ID: 17452438 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Cardinal Bernardin on the "forgotten factor" and other gaps in the abortion debate. Stahel TH America (NY); 1990 Apr; 162(13):354-6. PubMed ID: 15991413 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Family law I: abortion. Koscs ME Annu Surv Am Law; 1984; 2():929-60. PubMed ID: 16086473 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Abortion and the Supreme Court: advancing the culture of death. Catholic Church. National Conference of Catholic Bishops (NCCB) Origins; 2000 Dec; 30(26):405, 407. PubMed ID: 12542054 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. US judge again rules that partial birth abortion is unconstitutional. Tanne JH BMJ; 2004 Sep; 329(7467):644. PubMed ID: 15374909 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Implications of the Federal Abortion Ban for Women's Health in the United States. Weitz TA; Yanow S Reprod Health Matters; 2008 May; 16(31 Suppl):99-107. PubMed ID: 18772090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Abrogating stare decisis by statute: may Congress remove the precedential effect of Roe and Casey? Paulsen MS Yale Law J; 2001; 109(7):1535-602. PubMed ID: 16281343 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Worst choice: why we'd be better off without Roe. Rosen J New Repub; 2003 Feb; 228(7):15-6, 18. PubMed ID: 12769107 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The pregnant silence: Rust v. Sullivan, abortion rights, and publicly funded speech. Weeks AB North Carol Law Rev; 1992 Jun; 70(5):1623-68. PubMed ID: 16044600 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The Supreme Court and the Partial-birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003: a political procedure replaces woman-centered care. Gartner EC MedGenMed; 2007; 9(3):41; author reply 41. PubMed ID: 18159623 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The Supreme Court and the Partial-birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003: a political procedure replaces woman-centered care. Poppema ST MedGenMed; 2007; 9(3):41; author reply 41. PubMed ID: 18159625 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]