These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17491476)
21. Must we really make the case for abortion rights all over again? Forde C Conscience; 2005; 26(1):22-3. PubMed ID: 16639810 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Winter count: taking stock of abortion rights after Casey and Carhart. Borgmann CE Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):675-716. PubMed ID: 16700116 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Abortion in America. Shostak AB Futurist; 1991; 25(4):20-4. PubMed ID: 16145782 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Abortion issue moves to states: shift on federal bench spurs governors, legislators to battle Roe. Solomon D Wall St J (East Ed); 2006 Mar; ():A4. PubMed ID: 16578913 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The price of abortion: sixteen years later. Chopko ME; Harris PH; Alvare HM Natl Forum; 1989; 69(4):18, 20, 22. PubMed ID: 16100836 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Rust v. Sullivan: a better debate. America (NY); 1991 Jun; 164(22):611. PubMed ID: 15991418 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. US Supreme Court delays enforcement of strict Texas abortion law. McCarthy M BMJ; 2014 Oct; 349():g6304. PubMed ID: 25354191 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. God's littlest children and the right to live: the case for a positivist pro-life overturning of Roe. Marcin RB J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2008; 25(1):38-75. PubMed ID: 19137746 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Rights talk and its remedies: the jurisprudence of Mary Ann Glendon. Hagen JD America (NY); 2006 Jan 2-9; 194(1):14-6. PubMed ID: 16459378 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Resignation of US judge puts reproductive rights at risk. Hopkins Tanne J BMJ; 2005 Jul; 331(7509):130. PubMed ID: 16020851 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Parental notification and a minor's right to an abortion after Hodgson and Akron II. Graziano SG Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1991; 17(3):581-97. PubMed ID: 16145809 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. After Ayotte: the need to defend abortion rights with renewed "purpose.". Harv Law Rev; 2006 Jun; 119(8):2552-73. PubMed ID: 16827220 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Consti-tortion: tort law as an end-run around abortion rights after Planned Parenthood v. Casey. Stone AJ Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2000; 8(2):471-515. PubMed ID: 16594110 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The rhetoric of disrespect: uncovering the faulty premises infecting reproductive rights. Reilly EA Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 1996; 5(1):147-205. PubMed ID: 16594108 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Abortion in 1938 and today: plus ca change, plus c'est la meme chose. Bourne RW South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 2003; 12(2):225-75. PubMed ID: 16493843 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The legal status of abortion in the states if Roe v. Wade is overruled. Linton PB Issues Law Med; 2007; 23(1):3-43. PubMed ID: 17703698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The Leaked Supreme Court Ruling Opinion: Implications for Abortion Access. Reingold RB; Gostin LO JAMA; 2022 Jul; 328(1):13-14. PubMed ID: 35666522 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The Supreme Court and the Partial-birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003: a political procedure replaces woman-centered care. Nordholm S MedGenMed; 2007; 9(3):41; author reply 41. PubMed ID: 18159624 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Prenatal tort law and the personhood of the unborn child: a separate legal existence. Roden GJ St Thomas Law Rev; 2003; 16(1):207-86. PubMed ID: 16211760 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]