275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17493465)
1. Comparison of mortality benefit of immediate thrombolytic therapy versus delayed primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction.
Kent DM; Ruthazer R; Griffith JL; Beshansky JR; Grines CL; Aversano T; Concannon TW; Zalenski RJ; Selker HP
Am J Cardiol; 2007 May; 99(10):1384-8. PubMed ID: 17493465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of thrombolysis followed by broad use of percutaneous coronary intervention with primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment-elevation acute myocardial infarction: data from the french registry on acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (FAST-MI).
Danchin N; Coste P; Ferrières J; Steg PG; Cottin Y; Blanchard D; Belle L; Ritz B; Kirkorian G; Angioi M; Sans P; Charbonnier B; Eltchaninoff H; Guéret P; Khalife K; Asseman P; Puel J; Goldstein P; Cambou JP; Simon T;
Circulation; 2008 Jul; 118(3):268-76. PubMed ID: 18591434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transferring patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction for mechanical reperfusion: a meta-regression analysis of randomized trials.
De Luca G; Biondi-Zoccai G; Marino P
Ann Emerg Med; 2008 Dec; 52(6):665-76. PubMed ID: 19027496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does time matter? A pooled analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing primary percutaneous coronary intervention and in-hospital fibrinolysis in acute myocardial infarction patients.
Boersma E;
Eur Heart J; 2006 Apr; 27(7):779-88. PubMed ID: 16513663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predictive value of ST resolution analysis performed immediately versus at ninety minutes after primary percutaneous coronary intervention.
Kumar S; Sivagangabalan G; Hsieh C; Ryding AD; Narayan A; Chan H; Burgess DC; Ong AT; Sadick N; Kovoor P
Am J Cardiol; 2010 Feb; 105(4):467-74. PubMed ID: 20152240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Should patients in cardiogenic shock undergo rescue angioplasty after failed fibrinolysis: comparison of primary versus rescue angioplasty in cardiogenic shock patients.
Kunadian B; Vijayalakshmi K; Dunning J; Thornley AR; Sutton AG; Muir DF; Wright RA; Hall JA; de Belder MA
J Invasive Cardiol; 2007 May; 19(5):217-23. PubMed ID: 17476036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Percutaneous coronary intervention-related time delay, patient's risk profile, and survival benefits of primary angioplasty vs lytic therapy in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
De Luca G; Cassetti E; Marino P
Am J Emerg Med; 2009 Jul; 27(6):712-9. PubMed ID: 19751630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-term prognostic value of ST-segment resolution in patients treated with fibrinolysis or primary percutaneous coronary intervention results from the DANAMI-2 (DANish trial in acute myocardial infarction-2).
Sejersten M; Valeur N; Grande P; Nielsen TT; Clemmensen P;
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2009 Nov; 54(19):1763-9. PubMed ID: 19874989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Explanation for the survival benefit of primary angioplasty over thrombolytic therapy in patients with ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction.
Tarantini G; Razzolini R; Ramondo A; Napodano M; Bilato C; Iliceto S
Am J Cardiol; 2005 Dec; 96(11):1503-5. PubMed ID: 16310430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does diabetes mellitus abolish the beneficial effect of primary coronary angioplasty on long-term risk of reinfarction after acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction compared with fibrinolysis? (A DANAMI-2 substudy).
Madsen MM; Busk M; Søndergaard HM; Bøttcher M; Mortensen LS; Andersen HR; Nielsen TT;
Am J Cardiol; 2005 Dec; 96(11):1469-75. PubMed ID: 16310424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Relation between hospital specialization with primary percutaneous coronary intervention and clinical outcomes in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: National Registry of Myocardial Infarction-4 analysis.
Nallamothu BK; Wang Y; Magid DJ; McNamara RL; Herrin J; Bradley EH; Bates ER; Pollack CV; Krumholz HM;
Circulation; 2006 Jan; 113(2):222-9. PubMed ID: 16401769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of gender on outcomes of patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction transported for percutaneous coronary intervention: analysis of the PRAGUE-1 and 2 studies.
Motovska Z; Widimsky P; Aschermann M;
Heart; 2008 Mar; 94(3):e5. PubMed ID: 17693459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. System delay and timing of intervention in acute myocardial infarction (from the Danish Acute Myocardial Infarction-2 [DANAMI-2] trial).
Nielsen PH; Terkelsen CJ; Nielsen TT; Thuesen L; Krusell LR; Thayssen P; Kelbaek H; Abildgaard U; Villadsen AB; Andersen HR; Maeng M;
Am J Cardiol; 2011 Sep; 108(6):776-81. PubMed ID: 21757183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A percutaneous coronary intervention-thrombolytic predictive instrument to assist choosing between immediate thrombolytic therapy versus delayed primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction.
Kent DM; Ruthazer R; Griffith JL; Beshansky JR; Concannon TW; Aversano T; Grines CL; Zalenski RJ; Selker HP
Am J Cardiol; 2008 Mar; 101(6):790-5. PubMed ID: 18328842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the predictive value of four different risk scores for outcomes of patients with ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.
Lev EI; Kornowski R; Vaknin-Assa H; Porter A; Teplitsky I; Ben-Dor I; Brosh D; Fuchs S; Battler A; Assali A
Am J Cardiol; 2008 Jul; 102(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 18572028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Primary coronary angioplasty compared with intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: six-month follow up and analysis of individual patient data from randomized trials.
Grines C; Patel A; Zijlstra F; Weaver WD; Granger C; Simes RJ;
Am Heart J; 2003 Jan; 145(1):47-57. PubMed ID: 12514654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Primary coronary intervention in diabetic octogenarians with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction.
Sosnowski C; Janeczko-Sosnowska E; Woźniak J; Jasiński B; Dabrowski R; Sumiński A; Wiernikowski A; Ostrzycki A; Szwed H; Ruzyłło W
Kardiol Pol; 2007 Oct; 65(10):1181-6; discussion 1187-9. PubMed ID: 17979046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Time to reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction. It is time to reduce it!
Barbagelata A; Perna ER; Clemmensen P; Uretsky BF; Canella JP; Califf RM; Granger CB; Adams GL; Merla R; Birnbaum Y
J Electrocardiol; 2007 Jul; 40(3):257-64. PubMed ID: 17478179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Risk reduction for cardiac events after primary coronary intervention compared with thrombolysis for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (five-year results of the Swedish early decision reperfusion strategy [SWEDES] trial).
Aasa M; Dellborg M; Herlitz J; Svensson L; Grip L
Am J Cardiol; 2010 Dec; 106(12):1685-91. PubMed ID: 21126610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Field triage reduces treatment delay and improves long-term clinical outcome in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention.
Pedersen SH; Galatius S; Hansen PR; Mogelvang R; Abildstrom SZ; Sørensen R; Davidsen U; Galloe A; Abildgaard U; Iversen A; Bech J; Madsen JK; Jensen JS
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2009 Dec; 54(24):2296-302. PubMed ID: 19958965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
