130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17493667)
1. Is three-dimensional ultrasonography of additional value in the assessment of adnexal masses?
Geomini PM; Coppus SF; Kluivers KB; Bremer GL; Kruitwagen RF; Mol BW
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Jul; 106(1):153-9. PubMed ID: 17493667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The risk of malignancy index in discrimination of adnexal masses.
Ulusoy S; Akbayir O; Numanoglu C; Ulusoy N; Odabas E; Gulkilik A
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2007 Mar; 96(3):186-91. PubMed ID: 17280665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of adnexal masses with three-dimensional ultrasonography.
Geomini PM; Kluivers KB; Moret E; Bremer GL; Kruitwagen RF; Mol BW
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Nov; 108(5):1167-75. PubMed ID: 17077239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [The estimation of the probability of tumor malignacy on the basis of test combination in the primary diagnosis of adnexal tumors].
Smoleń A; Stachowicz N; Czekierowski A; Kotarski J
Ginekol Pol; 2010 Apr; 81(4):254-61. PubMed ID: 20476596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The accuracy of risk malignancy index in prediction of malignancy in women with adnexal mass in Basrah, Iraq.
Al-Asadi JN; Al-Maliki SK; Al-Dahhhan F; Al-Naama L; Suood F
Niger J Clin Pract; 2018 Oct; 21(10):1254-1259. PubMed ID: 30297555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound help in discrimination between benign and malignant ovarian masses?
Jokubkiene L; Sladkevicius P; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Feb; 29(2):215-25. PubMed ID: 17201017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sonographic discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses in premenopause.
Radosa MP; Vorwergk J; Fitzgerald J; Kaehler C; Schneider U; Camara O; Runnebaum IB; Schleußner E
Ultraschall Med; 2014 Aug; 35(4):339-44. PubMed ID: 23775448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Artificial neural network models for the preoperative discrimination between malignant and benign adnexal masses.
Timmerman D; Verrelst H; Bourne TH; De Moor B; Collins WP; Vergote I; Vandewalle J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jan; 13(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 10201082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimating the risk of malignancy of adnexal masses: validation of the ADNEX model in the hands of nonexpert ultrasonographers in a gynaecological oncology centre in China.
He P; Wang JJ; Duan W; Song C; Yang Y; Wu QQ
J Ovarian Res; 2021 Dec; 14(1):169. PubMed ID: 34857005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. What do contrast media add to three-dimensional power Doppler evaluation of adnexal masses?
Sparac V; Kupesić S; Kurjak A
Croat Med J; 2000 Sep; 41(3):257-61. PubMed ID: 10962043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Risk of malignancy index for adnexal masses.
Akdeniz N; Kuyumcuoğlu U; Kale A; Erdemoğlu M; Caca F
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2009; 30(2):178-80. PubMed ID: 19480249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional power-Doppler imaging in complex adnexal masses for the prediction of ovarian cancer.
Alcázar JL; Castillo G
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 192(3):807-12. PubMed ID: 15746675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Color Doppler energy prediction of malignancy in adnexal masses using logistic regression models.
Marret H; Ecochard R; Giraudeau B; Golfier F; Raudrant D; Lansac J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Dec; 20(6):597-604. PubMed ID: 12493050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Indeterminate Adnexal Cysts at US: Prevalence and Characteristics of Ovarian Cancer.
Sadowski EA; Paroder V; Patel-Lippmann K; Robbins JB; Barroilhet L; Maddox E; McMahon T; Sampene E; Wasnik AP; Blaty AD; Maturen KE
Radiology; 2018 Jun; 287(3):1041-1049. PubMed ID: 29480762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Preoperative Evaluation of the ADNEX Model for the Prediction of the Ovarian Cancer Risk of Adnexal Masses at Siriraj Hospital.
Poonyakanok V; Tanmahasamut P; Jaishuen A; Wongwananuruk T; Asumpinwong C; Panichyawat N; Chantrapanichkul P
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2021; 86(1-2):132-138. PubMed ID: 33596584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of models to diagnose ovarian cancer in patients managed surgically or conservatively: multicentre cohort study.
Van Calster B; Valentin L; Froyman W; Landolfo C; Ceusters J; Testa AC; Wynants L; Sladkevicius P; Van Holsbeke C; Domali E; Fruscio R; Epstein E; Franchi D; Kudla MJ; Chiappa V; Alcazar JL; Leone FPG; Buonomo F; Coccia ME; Guerriero S; Deo N; Jokubkiene L; Savelli L; Fischerová D; Czekierdowski A; Kaijser J; Coosemans A; Scambia G; Vergote I; Bourne T; Timmerman D
BMJ; 2020 Jul; 370():m2614. PubMed ID: 32732303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A nomogram for estimating the probability of ovarian cancer.
Lachance JA; Choudhri AF; Sarti M; Modesitt SC; Jazaeri AA; Stukenborg GJ
Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Apr; 121(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 21269667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of two ovarian malignancy prediction models based on age sonographic findings and serum CA125 measurement.
Arab M; Yaseri M; Ashrafganjoi T; Maktabi M; Noghabaee G; Sheibani K
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2012; 13(8):4199-202. PubMed ID: 23098430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of cancer prevalence on the use of risk-assessment cut-off levels and the performance of mathematical models to distinguish malignant from benign adnexal masses.
Daemen A; Jurkovic D; Van Holsbeke C; Guerriero S; Testa AC; Czekierdowski A; Fruscio R; Paladini D; Neven P; Rossi A; Bourne T; De Moor B; Timmerman D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Feb; 37(2):226-31. PubMed ID: 20878684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of a new logistic model in the preoperative evaluation of adnexal masses.
Alcázar JL; Errasti T; Laparte C; Jurado M; López-García G
J Ultrasound Med; 2001 Aug; 20(8):841-8. PubMed ID: 11503920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
