BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1749424)

  • 1. Human genome dispute.
    Rees DA
    Nature; 1991 Dec; 354(6353):426. PubMed ID: 1749424
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Human genome. MRC follows NIH on patents.
    Aldhous P
    Nature; 1992 Mar; 356(6365):98. PubMed ID: 1545873
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patents and the Human Genome Project.
    Smith GK; Kettelberger DM
    AIPLA Q J; 1994; 22(1):27-64. PubMed ID: 11660522
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Information access. Prepublication data release, latency, and genome commons.
    Contreras JL
    Science; 2010 Jul; 329(5990):393-4. PubMed ID: 20651137
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Human genome project. Tit for tat on patents?
    Aldhous P
    Nature; 1991 Oct; 353(6347):785. PubMed ID: 1944543
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. MRC delays plans to charge for genome data.
    Stewart A
    BMJ; 1991 Nov; 303(6814):1353-4. PubMed ID: 11642939
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genome project. Patents, round two.
    Anderson C
    Nature; 1992 Feb; 355(6362):665. PubMed ID: 1741044
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genome sequencing. Clinton and Blair back rapid release of data.
    Marshall E
    Science; 2000 Mar; 287(5460):1903. PubMed ID: 10755935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The human genome. Controversial from the start.
    Roberts L
    Science; 2001 Feb; 291(5507):1182-8. PubMed ID: 11233424
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In the crossfire: Collins on genomes, patents, and 'rivalry'. Interview by Eliot Marshall, Elizabeth Pennisi, and Leslie Roberts.
    Collins F
    Science; 2000 Mar; 287(5462):2396-8. PubMed ID: 10766612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Big bucks buy up genome secrets.
    Coghlan A
    New Sci; 1995 Sep; 147(1997):4. PubMed ID: 11656461
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. U.S. seeks patent on genetic codes, setting off furor.
    Andrews EL
    N Y Times Web; 1991 Oct; ():A1, A12. PubMed ID: 11647909
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On gene patenting.
    Healy B
    N Engl J Med; 1992 Aug; 327(9):664-8. PubMed ID: 1640972
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Will NIH patent bid cause "land rush"?
    Jenks S
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1992 Jun; 84(12):920-1. PubMed ID: 1629911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Snipping away at genome patenting.
    Marshall E
    Science; 1997 Sep; 277(5333):1752-3. PubMed ID: 9324756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genome patent fight erupts.
    Roberts L
    Science; 1991 Oct; 254(5029):184-6. PubMed ID: 1925568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. $60 million for genome sequencing.
    Nature; 1996 Apr; 380(6574):471. PubMed ID: 8606754
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Human Genome Project and patents.
    Science; 1991 Dec; 254(5039):1710, 1712. PubMed ID: 1763316
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Getting it together.
    Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Jul; 18(7):693. PubMed ID: 10888792
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ministers move to limit genome patents.
    Charles D; Coghlan A
    New Sci; 1992 Mar; 133(1812):9. PubMed ID: 16044589
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.