BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

336 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17494455)

  • 1. National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel's updated pressure ulcer staging system.
    Black J; Baharestani M; Cuddigan J; Dorner B; Edsberg L; Langemo D; Posthauer ME; Ratliff C; Taler G;
    Urol Nurs; 2007 Apr; 27(2):144-50, 156. PubMed ID: 17494455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel's updated pressure ulcer staging system.
    Black J; Baharestani M; Cuddigan J; Dorner B; Edsberg L; Langemo D; Posthauer ME; Ratliff C; Taler G;
    Dermatol Nurs; 2007 Aug; 19(4):343-9; quiz 350. PubMed ID: 17874603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. EPUAP classification system for pressure ulcers: European reliability study.
    Beeckman D; Schoonhoven L; Fletcher J; Furtado K; Gunningberg L; Heyman H; Lindholm C; Paquay L; VerdĂș J; Defloor T
    J Adv Nurs; 2007 Dec; 60(6):682-91. PubMed ID: 18039255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Controversies in classifying and assessing grade I pressure ulcers.
    Bethell E
    J Wound Care; 2003 Jan; 12(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 12572234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Policy implications of using reverse staging to monitor pressure ulcer status.
    Maklebust J
    Adv Wound Care; 1997 Sep; 10(5):32-5. PubMed ID: 9362575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel's updated pressure ulcer staging system.
    Black J; Baharestani MM; Cuddigan J; Dorner B; Edsberg L; Langemo D; Posthauer ME; Ratliff C; Taler G;
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2007 May; 20(5):269-74. PubMed ID: 17473563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Deep tissue injury from a bioengineering point of view.
    Gefen A
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2009 Apr; 55(4):26-36. PubMed ID: 19387094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Applying observations from forensic science to understanding the development of pressure ulcers.
    Farid KJ
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2007 Apr; 53(4):26-8, 30, 32 passim. PubMed ID: 17449915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Revision of the PUSH Tool using an expanded database. Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing.
    Stotts NA; Rodeheaver GT
    Adv Wound Care; 1997 Sep; 10(5):107-10. PubMed ID: 9362593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing the need for developing a comprehensive content-validated pressure ulcer guideline.
    Bolton L; Girolami S; Slayton S; Berger TM; Foster L; Whittington KT; Merkle D;
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2008 Nov; 54(11):22-30. PubMed ID: 19037134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pressure ulcer scale for healing: derivation and validation of the PUSH tool. The PUSH Task Force.
    Thomas DR; Rodeheaver GT; Bartolucci AA; Franz RA; Sussman C; Ferrell BA; Cuddigan J; Stotts NA; Maklebust J
    Adv Wound Care; 1997 Sep; 10(5):96-101. PubMed ID: 9362591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An interrater reliability study of the assessment of pressure ulcer risk using the Braden scale and the classification of pressure ulcers in a home care setting.
    Kottner J; Halfens R; Dassen T
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Oct; 46(10):1307-12. PubMed ID: 19406400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pressure ulcer grading.
    Moore Z
    Nurs Stand; 2005 Sep 7-13; 19(52):56-64; quiz 66. PubMed ID: 16163987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliability of the European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel classification system.
    Defloor T; Schoonhoven L; Katrien V; Weststrate J; Myny D
    J Adv Nurs; 2006 Apr; 54(2):189-98. PubMed ID: 16553705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing and grading pressure ulcers.
    Nurs Stand; 2000 May 3-9; 14(33):2p.. PubMed ID: 11975252
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pressure ulcers in neonates and children: an NPUAP white paper.
    Baharestani MM; Ratliff CR
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2007 Apr; 20(4):208, 210, 212, 214, 216, 218-20. PubMed ID: 17415029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A pilot study providing evidence for the validity of a new tool to improve assignment of national pressure ulcer advisory panel stage to pressure ulcers.
    Young DL; Estocado N; Landers MR; Black J
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2011 Apr; 24(4):168-75. PubMed ID: 21422841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The reliability of the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators pressure ulcer indicator: a triangulation approach.
    Bergquist-Beringer S; Gajewski B; Dunton N; Klaus S
    J Nurs Care Qual; 2011; 26(4):292-301. PubMed ID: 21407089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development of a new risk assessment scale for predicting pressure ulcers in an intensive care unit.
    Suriadi ; Sanada H; Sugama J; Thigpen B; Subuh M
    Nurs Crit Care; 2008; 13(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 18226053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Examining the validity of pressure ulcer risk assessment scales: a replication study.
    Gould D; Goldstone L; Kelly D; Gammon J
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2004 Mar; 41(3):331-9. PubMed ID: 14967190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.