These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17495490)

  • 1. Transrectal ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging in the estimation of prostate volume as compared with radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Lee JS; Chung BH
    Urol Int; 2007; 78(4):323-7. PubMed ID: 17495490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of prostate volume measured by transrectal ultrasonography and MRI with the actual prostate volume measured after radical prostatectomy.
    Jeong CW; Park HK; Hong SK; Byun SS; Lee HJ; Lee SE
    Urol Int; 2008; 81(2):179-85. PubMed ID: 18758216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of prostate volume measured by transrectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging: is transrectal ultrasound suitable to determine which patients should undergo active surveillance?
    Weiss BE; Wein AJ; Malkowicz SB; Guzzo TJ
    Urol Oncol; 2013 Nov; 31(8):1436-40. PubMed ID: 22503576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of transrectal ultrasound prostatic volume estimation with magnetic resonance imaging volume estimation and surgical specimen weight in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia.
    Tewari A; Indudhara R; Shinohara K; Schalow E; Woods M; Lee R; Anderson C; Narayan P
    J Clin Ultrasound; 1996 May; 24(4):169-74. PubMed ID: 8727414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Localising prostate cancer: comparison of endorectal magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and 3D-MR spectroscopic imaging with transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy.
    Goris Gbenou MC; Peltier A; Addla SK; Lemort M; Bollens R; Larsimont D; Roumeguère T; Schulman CC; van Velthoven R
    Urol Int; 2012; 88(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 22004874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The accuracy of transrectal ultrasound prostate volume estimation: clinical correlations.
    Matthews GJ; Motta J; Fracehia JA
    J Clin Ultrasound; 1996; 24(9):501-5. PubMed ID: 8906481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Comparison of Imaging and Clinical Methods to Estimate Prostate Volume: A Single-Centre Retrospective Study.
    Massanova M; Robertson S; Barone B; Dutto L; Caputo VF; Bhatt JR; Ahmad I; Bada M; Obeidallah A; Crocetto F
    Urol Int; 2021; 105(9-10):804-810. PubMed ID: 34247169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of in vivo calculation with ultrasonography compared to physical sections in vitro: a stereological study of prostate volumes.
    Acer N; Sofikerim M; Ertekin T; Unur E; Çay M; Öztürk F
    Anat Sci Int; 2011 Jun; 86(2):78-85. PubMed ID: 20734181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Determination of prostate gland volume by transrectal ultrasound: correlation with radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Myschetzky PS; Suburu RE; Kelly BS; Wilson ML; Chen SC; Lee F
    Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl; 1991; 137():107-11. PubMed ID: 1947827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Determination of Prostate Volume: A Comparison of Contemporary Methods.
    Bezinque A; Moriarity A; Farrell C; Peabody H; Noyes SL; Lane BR
    Acad Radiol; 2018 Dec; 25(12):1582-1587. PubMed ID: 29609953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prostate cancer volume estimations based on transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsy in order to predict clinically significant prostate cancer.
    Konyalioglu E; Tarhan H; Cakmak O; Pala EE; Zorlu F
    Int Braz J Urol; 2015; 41(3):442-8. PubMed ID: 26200537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prostate weight is the preferred measure of prostate size in radical prostatectomy cohorts.
    Hong MK; Yao HH; Rzetelski-West K; Namdarian B; Pedersen J; Peters JS; Hovens CM; Corcoran NM
    BJU Int; 2012 Apr; 109 Suppl 3():57-63. PubMed ID: 22458496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prostate volume estimations using magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasound compared to radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Paterson NR; Lavallée LT; Nguyen LN; Witiuk K; Ross J; Mallick R; Shabana W; MacDonald B; Scheida N; Fergusson D; Momoli F; Cnossen S; Morash C; Cagiannos I; Breau RH
    Can Urol Assoc J; 2016 Aug; 10(7-8):264-268. PubMed ID: 27878049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of in-vivo assessment of prostatic volume by MRI and transrectal ultrasonography.
    Rahmouni A; Yang A; Tempany CM; Frenkel T; Epstein J; Walsh P; Leichner PK; Ricci C; Zerhouni E
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1992; 16(6):935-40. PubMed ID: 1385499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of digital rectal examination, transrectal ultrasonography, and multicoil magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative evaluation of prostate cancer.
    Sanchez-Chapado M; Angulo JC; Ibarburen C; Aguado F; Ruiz A; Viaño J; García-Segura JM; Gonzalez-Esteban J; Rodriquez-Vallejo JM
    Eur Urol; 1997; 32(2):140-9. PubMed ID: 9286643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prostate volume measured preoperatively predicts for organ-confined disease in men with clinically localized prostate cancer.
    Bianco FJ; Mallah KN; Korets R; Hricak H; Scardino PT; Kattan MW
    Urology; 2007 Feb; 69(2):343-6. PubMed ID: 17320675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Early localization of recurrent prostate cancer after prostatectomy by endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging.
    Linder BJ; Kawashima A; Woodrum DA; Tollefson MK; Karnes J; Davis BJ; Rangel LJ; King BF; Mynderse LA
    Can J Urol; 2014 Jun; 21(3):7283-9. PubMed ID: 24978358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prostate volume measurement by TRUS using heights obtained by transaxial and midsagittal scanning: comparison with specimen volume following radical prostatectomy.
    Park SB; Kim JK; Choi SH; Noh HN; Ji EK; Cho KS
    Korean J Radiol; 2000; 1(2):110-3. PubMed ID: 11752939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of ultrasound in estimation of prostate weight: comparison of urologists and radiologists.
    Nunez-Nateras R; Andrews JR; Martin GL; Andrews PE; Humphreys MR; Ferrigni RG; Eversman WG; Castle EP
    Can J Urol; 2010 Feb; 17(1):4985-8. PubMed ID: 20156377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contrast-enhanced transrectal ultrasound (CE-TRUS) with cadence-contrast pulse sequence (CPS) technology for the identification of prostate cancer.
    Seitz M; Gratzke C; Schlenker B; Buchner A; Karl A; Roosen A; Singer BB; Bastian PJ; Ergün S; Stief CG; Reich O; Tilki D
    Urol Oncol; 2011; 29(3):295-301. PubMed ID: 19523857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.