337 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17495582)
1. SF-36 PCS benefit-cost ratio of lumbar fusion comparison to other surgical interventions: a thought experiment.
Polly DW; Glassman SD; Schwender JD; Shaffrey CI; Branch C; Burkus JK; Gornet MF;
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(11 Suppl):S20-6. PubMed ID: 17495582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative charge analysis of one- and two-level lumbar total disc arthroplasty versus circumferential lumbar fusion.
Levin DA; Bendo JA; Quirno M; Errico T; Goldstein J; Spivak J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(25):2905-9. PubMed ID: 18246016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of health-related quality of life after surgical treatment of focal symptomatic spinal stenosis compared with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee.
Rampersaud YR; Ravi B; Lewis SJ; Stas V; Barron R; Davey R; Mahomed N
Spine J; 2008; 8(2):296-304. PubMed ID: 17669690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. MOS short form 36 and Oswestry Disability Index outcomes in lumbar fusion: a multicenter experience.
Glassman S; Gornet MF; Branch C; Polly D; Peloza J; Schwender JD; Carreon L
Spine J; 2006; 6(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 16413443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative outcomes and cost-utility following surgical treatment of focal lumbar spinal stenosis compared with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: part 2--estimated lifetime incremental cost-utility ratios.
Rampersaud YR; Tso P; Walker KR; Lewis SJ; Davey JR; Mahomed NN; Coyte PC
Spine J; 2014 Feb; 14(2):244-54. PubMed ID: 24239803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of short-term SF-36 results between total joint arthroplasty and cervical spine decompression and fusion or arthroplasty.
Anderson PA; Puschak TJ; Sasso RC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(2):176-83. PubMed ID: 19139668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Postoperative improvement in health-related quality of life: a national comparison of surgical treatment for focal (one- to two-level) lumbar spinal stenosis compared with total joint arthroplasty for osteoarthritis.
Rampersaud YR; Wai EK; Fisher CG; Yee AJ; Dvorak MF; Finkelstein JA; Gandhi R; Abraham EP; Lewis SJ; Alexander DI; Oxner WM; Davey JR; Mahomed N
Spine J; 2011 Nov; 11(11):1033-41. PubMed ID: 22122836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The cost effectiveness of single-level instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion at 5 years after surgery.
Glassman SD; Polly DW; Dimar JR; Carreon LY
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Apr; 37(9):769-74. PubMed ID: 20489676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospective, randomized trial of metal-on-metal artificial lumbar disc replacement: initial results for treatment of discogenic pain.
Sasso RC; Foulk DM; Hahn M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 18197095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lumbar spinal fusion versus anterior lumbar disc replacement: the financial implications.
Patel VV; Estes S; Lindley EM; Burger E
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Oct; 21(7):473-6. PubMed ID: 18836357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative outcomes and cost-utility after surgical treatment of focal lumbar spinal stenosis compared with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee--part 1: long-term change in health-related quality of life.
Rampersaud YR; Lewis SJ; Davey JR; Gandhi R; Mahomed NN
Spine J; 2014 Feb; 14(2):234-43. PubMed ID: 24325880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Controversies about instrumented surgery and pain relief in degenerative lumbar spine pain. Results of scientific evidence].
Robaina-Padrón FJ
Neurocirugia (Astur); 2007 Oct; 18(5):406-13. PubMed ID: 18008014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outcome assessment in lumbar spine surgery.
Zanoli G
Acta Orthop Suppl; 2005 Jun; 76(318):5-47. PubMed ID: 16175972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Financial incentives for lumbar surgery: a critical analysis of physician reimbursement for decompression and fusion procedures.
Whang PG; Lim MR; Sasso RC; Skelton A; Brown ZB; Greg Anderson D; Albert TJ; Hilibrand AS; Vaccaro AR
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Aug; 21(6):381-6. PubMed ID: 18679090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical outcomes in older patients after posterolateral lumbar fusion.
Glassman SD; Carreon LY; Dimar JR; Campbell MJ; Puno RM; Johnson JR
Spine J; 2007; 7(5):547-51. PubMed ID: 17905316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of surgical volume and the early experience with lumbar total disc replacement as part of the investigational device exemption study of the Charité Artificial Disc.
Regan JJ; McAfee PC; Blumenthal SL; Guyer RD; Geisler FH; Garcia R; Maxwell JH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Sep; 31(19):2270-6. PubMed ID: 16946666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Artificial disc versus fusion: a prospective, randomized study with 2-year follow-up on 99 patients.
Sasso RC; Smucker JD; Hacker RJ; Heller JG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(26):2933-40; discussion 2941-2. PubMed ID: 18091483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales.
Copay AG; Glassman SD; Subach BR; Berven S; Schuler TC; Carreon LY
Spine J; 2008; 8(6):968-74. PubMed ID: 18201937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Lumbar fusion outcomes stratified by specific diagnostic indication.
Glassman SD; Carreon LY; Djurasovic M; Dimar JR; Johnson JR; Puno RM; Campbell MJ
Spine J; 2009; 9(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 18805059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of analytic approaches for the economic evaluation of new technologies alongside multicenter clinical trials.
Taira DA; Seto TB; Siegrist R; Cosgrove R; Berezin R; Cohen DJ
Am Heart J; 2003 Mar; 145(3):452-8. PubMed ID: 12660668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
