BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

415 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17495651)

  • 1. Different basic dosimetric quantities for the characterization of exposure to low-frequency electric and magnetic fields and the implication for practical exposure conditions and guidelines.
    Martens L
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):515-20. PubMed ID: 17495651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Numerical dosimetry ELF: accuracy of the method, variability of models and parameters, and the implication for quantifying guidelines.
    Bahr A; Bolz T; Hennes C
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):521-30. PubMed ID: 17495652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dosimetric comparison between different quantities for limiting exposure in the RF band: rationale and implications for guidelines.
    Lin JC
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):547-53. PubMed ID: 17495655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Static fields: biological effects and mechanisms relevant to exposure limits.
    van Rongen E; Saunders RD; van Deventer ET; Repacholi MH
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):584-90. PubMed ID: 17495659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of important international and national standards for limiting exposure to EMF including the scientific rationale.
    Roy CR; Martin LJ
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):635-41. PubMed ID: 17495666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Requirements for reliable worst-case assessment of human exposure to RF electromagnetic fields with known uncertainty.
    Christ A
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):554-64. PubMed ID: 17495656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of complex EMF exposure situations including inhomogeneous field distribution.
    Jokela K
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):531-40. PubMed ID: 17495653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rapporteur Report: ICNIRP international workshop on EMF dosimetry and biophysical aspects relevant to setting exposure guidelines.
    Roy CR
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):658-67. PubMed ID: 17495669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of non-sinusoidal, pulsed, or intermittent exposure to low frequency electric and magnetic fields.
    Heinrich H
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):541-6. PubMed ID: 17495654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Demodulation in tissue, the relevant parameters and the implications for limiting exposure.
    Silny J
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):604-8. PubMed ID: 17495662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accounting for human variability and sensitivity in setting standards for electromagnetic fields.
    Bailey WH; Erdreich LS
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):649-57. PubMed ID: 17495668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Exposure of biological material to ultra-wideband electromagnetic pulses: dosimetric implications.
    Simicevic N
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):574-83. PubMed ID: 17495658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dosimetric assessment of simultaneous exposure to elf electric and magnetic fields.
    Leitgeb N; Cech R
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Feb; 55(2 Pt 1):671-4. PubMed ID: 18270003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of biological effects, dosimetric models, and exposure assessment related to ELF electric- and magnetic-field guidelines.
    Kavet R; Stuchly MA; Bailey WH; Bracken TD
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2001 Dec; 16(12):1118-38. PubMed ID: 11783873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development of the female voxel phantom, NAOMI, and its application to calculations of induced current densities and electric fields from applied low frequency magnetic and electric fields.
    Dimbylow P
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(6):1047-70. PubMed ID: 15798308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Thermal mechanisms of interaction of radiofrequency energy with biological systems with relevance to exposure guidelines.
    Foster KR; Glaser R
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):609-20. PubMed ID: 17495663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Recent advances in research relevant to electric and magnetic field exposure guidelines.
    Kavet R; Bailey WH; Bracken TD; Patterson RM
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2008 Oct; 29(7):499-526. PubMed ID: 18618584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A neurobiological basis for ELF guidelines.
    Saunders RD; Jefferys JG
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):596-603. PubMed ID: 17495661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Numerical study of currents in workers induced by body-motion around high-ultrahigh field MRI magnets.
    ; Trakic A; Wang H; Liu F
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Nov; 26(5):1261-77. PubMed ID: 17969138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Current density in a model of a human body with a conductive implant exposed to ELF electric and magnetic fields.
    Valic B; Gajsek P; Miklavcic D
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2009 Oct; 30(7):591-9. PubMed ID: 19418511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.