BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

407 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17495655)

  • 1. Dosimetric comparison between different quantities for limiting exposure in the RF band: rationale and implications for guidelines.
    Lin JC
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):547-53. PubMed ID: 17495655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Numerical dosimetry ELF: accuracy of the method, variability of models and parameters, and the implication for quantifying guidelines.
    Bahr A; Bolz T; Hennes C
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):521-30. PubMed ID: 17495652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Different basic dosimetric quantities for the characterization of exposure to low-frequency electric and magnetic fields and the implication for practical exposure conditions and guidelines.
    Martens L
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):515-20. PubMed ID: 17495651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Requirements for reliable worst-case assessment of human exposure to RF electromagnetic fields with known uncertainty.
    Christ A
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):554-64. PubMed ID: 17495656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Implications of clinical RF hyperthermia on protection limits in the RF range.
    Wust P; Nadobny J; Szimtenings M; Stetter E; Gellermann J
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):565-73. PubMed ID: 17495657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Thermal mechanisms of interaction of radiofrequency energy with biological systems with relevance to exposure guidelines.
    Foster KR; Glaser R
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):609-20. PubMed ID: 17495663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Demodulation in tissue, the relevant parameters and the implications for limiting exposure.
    Silny J
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):604-8. PubMed ID: 17495662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of complex EMF exposure situations including inhomogeneous field distribution.
    Jokela K
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):531-40. PubMed ID: 17495653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of important international and national standards for limiting exposure to EMF including the scientific rationale.
    Roy CR; Martin LJ
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):635-41. PubMed ID: 17495666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rapporteur Report: ICNIRP international workshop on EMF dosimetry and biophysical aspects relevant to setting exposure guidelines.
    Roy CR
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):658-67. PubMed ID: 17495669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Static fields: biological effects and mechanisms relevant to exposure limits.
    van Rongen E; Saunders RD; van Deventer ET; Repacholi MH
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):584-90. PubMed ID: 17495659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Exposure of biological material to ultra-wideband electromagnetic pulses: dosimetric implications.
    Simicevic N
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):574-83. PubMed ID: 17495658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of non-sinusoidal, pulsed, or intermittent exposure to low frequency electric and magnetic fields.
    Heinrich H
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):541-6. PubMed ID: 17495654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The development of biomedical approaches and concepts in radiofrequency radiation protection.
    Czerski P
    J Microw Power Electromagn Energy; 1986; 21(1):9-23. PubMed ID: 3635631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accounting for human variability and sensitivity in setting standards for electromagnetic fields.
    Bailey WH; Erdreich LS
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):649-57. PubMed ID: 17495668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of biological effects, dosimetric models, and exposure assessment related to ELF electric- and magnetic-field guidelines.
    Kavet R; Stuchly MA; Bailey WH; Bracken TD
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2001 Dec; 16(12):1118-38. PubMed ID: 11783873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. FDTD calculations of specific energy absorption rate in a seated voxel model of the human body from 10 MHz to 3 GHz.
    Findlay RP; Dimbylow PJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(9):2339-52. PubMed ID: 16625046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A numerical evaluation of SAR distribution and temperature changes around a metallic plate in the head of a RF exposed worker.
    McIntosh RL; Anderson V; McKenzie RJ
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2005 Jul; 26(5):377-88. PubMed ID: 15924346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A neurobiological basis for ELF guidelines.
    Saunders RD; Jefferys JG
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):596-603. PubMed ID: 17495661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dominant factors influencing whole-body average SAR due to far-field exposure in whole-body resonance frequency and GHz regions.
    Hirata A; Kodera S; Wang J; Fujiwara O
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2007 Sep; 28(6):484-7. PubMed ID: 17486582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.