BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

483 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17495668)

  • 1. Accounting for human variability and sensitivity in setting standards for electromagnetic fields.
    Bailey WH; Erdreich LS
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):649-57. PubMed ID: 17495668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rapporteur Report: ICNIRP international workshop on EMF dosimetry and biophysical aspects relevant to setting exposure guidelines.
    Roy CR
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):658-67. PubMed ID: 17495669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Requirements for reliable worst-case assessment of human exposure to RF electromagnetic fields with known uncertainty.
    Christ A
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):554-64. PubMed ID: 17495656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of important international and national standards for limiting exposure to EMF including the scientific rationale.
    Roy CR; Martin LJ
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):635-41. PubMed ID: 17495666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Static fields: biological effects and mechanisms relevant to exposure limits.
    van Rongen E; Saunders RD; van Deventer ET; Repacholi MH
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):584-90. PubMed ID: 17495659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Demodulation in tissue, the relevant parameters and the implications for limiting exposure.
    Silny J
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):604-8. PubMed ID: 17495662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Thermal mechanisms of interaction of radiofrequency energy with biological systems with relevance to exposure guidelines.
    Foster KR; Glaser R
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):609-20. PubMed ID: 17495663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Numerical dosimetry ELF: accuracy of the method, variability of models and parameters, and the implication for quantifying guidelines.
    Bahr A; Bolz T; Hennes C
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):521-30. PubMed ID: 17495652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of non-sinusoidal, pulsed, or intermittent exposure to low frequency electric and magnetic fields.
    Heinrich H
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):541-6. PubMed ID: 17495654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Exposure of biological material to ultra-wideband electromagnetic pulses: dosimetric implications.
    Simicevic N
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):574-83. PubMed ID: 17495658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Different basic dosimetric quantities for the characterization of exposure to low-frequency electric and magnetic fields and the implication for practical exposure conditions and guidelines.
    Martens L
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):515-20. PubMed ID: 17495651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Implications of clinical RF hyperthermia on protection limits in the RF range.
    Wust P; Nadobny J; Szimtenings M; Stetter E; Gellermann J
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):565-73. PubMed ID: 17495657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of complex EMF exposure situations including inhomogeneous field distribution.
    Jokela K
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):531-40. PubMed ID: 17495653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dosimetric comparison between different quantities for limiting exposure in the RF band: rationale and implications for guidelines.
    Lin JC
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):547-53. PubMed ID: 17495655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A neurobiological basis for ELF guidelines.
    Saunders RD; Jefferys JG
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):596-603. PubMed ID: 17495661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis and measurements of magnetic field exposures for healthcare workers in selected MR environments.
    Fuentes MA; Trakic A; Wilson SJ; Crozier S
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Apr; 55(4):1355-64. PubMed ID: 18390326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perception of ELF electromagnetic fields: excitation thresholds and inter-individual variability.
    Leitgeb N; Schröttner J; Cech R
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):591-5. PubMed ID: 17495660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Recent advances in research relevant to electric and magnetic field exposure guidelines.
    Kavet R; Bailey WH; Bracken TD; Patterson RM
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2008 Oct; 29(7):499-526. PubMed ID: 18618584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exposures from environmental radioactivity: international safety standards.
    Balonov M;
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2008 Nov; 66(11):1546-9. PubMed ID: 18508274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of biological effects, dosimetric models, and exposure assessment related to ELF electric- and magnetic-field guidelines.
    Kavet R; Stuchly MA; Bailey WH; Bracken TD
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2001 Dec; 16(12):1118-38. PubMed ID: 11783873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.