These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17495670)

  • 1. On absorbed dose coefficients calculated by Veinot and Hertel.
    Schwahn SO
    Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):668; author reply 669. PubMed ID: 17495670
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Photon extremity absorbed dose and kerma conversion coefficients for calibration geometries.
    Veinot KG; Hertel NE
    Health Phys; 2007 Feb; 92(2):179-85. PubMed ID: 17220720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimated fluence-to-absorbed dose conversion coefficients for use in radiological protection of embryo and foetus against external exposure to photons from 50 keV to 10 GeV.
    Chen J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(4):358-63. PubMed ID: 16698964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Calibration of EPR signal dose response of tooth enamel to photons: experiment and Monte Carlo simulation.
    Ivannikov AI; Tikunov DD; Borysheva NB; Trompier F; Skvortsov VG; Stepanenko VF; Hoshi M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 108(4):303-15. PubMed ID: 15103060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dose-area product measurements and determination of conversion coefficients for the estimation of effective dose in dental lateral cephalometric radiology.
    Looe HK; Eenboom F; Chofor N; Pfaffenberger A; Sering M; Rühmann A; Poplawski A; Willborn K; Poppe B
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 124(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 17309875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Absorbed dose conversion coefficients for embryo and foetus in neutron fields.
    Chen J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 126(1-4):568-71. PubMed ID: 17525064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Preliminary studies on neutron conversion coefficients calculated with MCNPX in NORMAN voxel phantom.
    Gualdrini G; Ferrari P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 126(1-4):449-52. PubMed ID: 17502319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. ERIDAS, a computer program for rapid calculation of internal doses from measurements of people in an emergency.
    Youngman MJ; Davis KE; Etherington G; Marsh JW
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 127(1-4):374-7. PubMed ID: 18003709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comments on "Dose-response relationships for radicals trapped in irradiated solids" by W. H. Nelson (Radiat. Res. 163, 673-680, 2005).
    Simmons JA
    Radiat Res; 2006 May; 165(5):621-2. PubMed ID: 16669745
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Proton and photon absorbed-dose conversion coefficients for embryo and foetus from top-down irradiation geometry.
    Chen J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 124(2):85-8. PubMed ID: 17223634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of specific absorbed fractions from internal photon sources in ORNL analytical adult phantom.
    Hakimabad HM; Motavalli LR
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 128(4):427-31. PubMed ID: 17951243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dosimetry for epidemiological studies: learning from the past, looking to the future.
    Simon SL; Bouville A; Kleinerman R; Ron E
    Radiat Res; 2006 Jul; 166(1 Pt 2):313-8. PubMed ID: 16808617
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. HPA-RPD advice on practical implementation of EMF exposure guidelines.
    Swanson J
    J Radiol Prot; 2005 Jun; 25(2):212. PubMed ID: 16060004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Local organ dose conversion coefficients for angiographic examinations of coronary arteries.
    Schlattl H; Zankl M; Hausleiter J; Hoeschen C
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug; 52(15):4393-408. PubMed ID: 17634640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Monte Carlo simulation of trabecular bone remodelling and absorbed dose coefficients for tritium and 14C.
    Richardson RB; Nie HL; Chettle DR
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 127(1-4):158-62. PubMed ID: 17652111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Calculation of energy distributions of charged particles produced by neutrons from 0.14 to 65 MeV in tissue substitutes.
    Tsuda S; Nakane Y; Yamaguchi Y
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 126(1-4):174-7. PubMed ID: 17569688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of experimental and calculated calibration coefficients for a high sensitivity ionization chamber.
    Amiot MN; Mesradi MR; Chisté V; Morin M; Rigoulay F
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2012 Sep; 70(9):2232-6. PubMed ID: 22429557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Radiation dosimetry and exposure in nuclear medicine.
    Stabin MG; Brill AB
    Semin Nucl Med; 2008 Sep; 38(5):306-7. PubMed ID: 18662552
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimating uncertainty on internal dose assessments.
    Puncher M; Birchall A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 127(1-4):544-7. PubMed ID: 17993651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of contributors to radiation dose following intakes of rapidly excreted [14C]-compounds.
    Taylor DM
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 127(1-4):440-3. PubMed ID: 17553859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.