These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

281 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17496139)

  • 1. High relatedness maintains multicellular cooperation in a social amoeba by controlling cheater mutants.
    Gilbert OM; Foster KR; Mehdiabadi NJ; Strassmann JE; Queller DC
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2007 May; 104(21):8913-7. PubMed ID: 17496139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Kin recognition protects cooperators against cheaters.
    Ho HI; Hirose S; Kuspa A; Shaulsky G
    Curr Biol; 2013 Aug; 23(16):1590-5. PubMed ID: 23910661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. High relatedness is necessary and sufficient to maintain multicellularity in Dictyostelium.
    Kuzdzal-Fick JJ; Fox SA; Strassmann JE; Queller DC
    Science; 2011 Dec; 334(6062):1548-51. PubMed ID: 22174251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Facultative cheater mutants reveal the genetic complexity of cooperation in social amoebae.
    Santorelli LA; Thompson CR; Villegas E; Svetz J; Dinh C; Parikh A; Sucgang R; Kuspa A; Strassmann JE; Queller DC; Shaulsky G
    Nature; 2008 Feb; 451(7182):1107-10. PubMed ID: 18272966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Concurrent coevolution of intra-organismal cheaters and resisters.
    Levin SR; Brock DA; Queller DC; Strassmann JE
    J Evol Biol; 2015 Apr; 28(4):756-65. PubMed ID: 25772340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does high relatedness promote cheater-free multicellularity in synthetic lifecycles?
    Inglis RF; Ryu E; Asikhia O; Strassmann JE; Queller DC
    J Evol Biol; 2017 May; 30(5):985-993. PubMed ID: 28294448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In the social amoeba
    Medina J; Larsen T; Queller DC; Strassmann JE
    PeerJ; 2024; 12():e17118. PubMed ID: 38562996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Strategic investment explains patterns of cooperation and cheating in a microbe.
    Madgwick PG; Stewart B; Belcher LJ; Thompson CRL; Wolf JB
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 May; 115(21):E4823-E4832. PubMed ID: 29735672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cheating by exploitation of developmental prestalk patterning in Dictyostelium discoideum.
    Khare A; Shaulsky G
    PLoS Genet; 2010 Feb; 6(2):e1000854. PubMed ID: 20195510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evolution of cooperation and control of cheating in a social microbe.
    Strassmann JE; Queller DC
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 Jun; 108 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):10855-62. PubMed ID: 21690338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cheater-resistance is not futile.
    Khare A; Santorelli LA; Strassmann JE; Queller DC; Kuspa A; Shaulsky G
    Nature; 2009 Oct; 461(7266):980-2. PubMed ID: 19794414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Kin selection-mutation balance: a model for the origin, maintenance, and consequences of social cheating.
    Van Dyken JD; Linksvayer TA; Wade MJ
    Am Nat; 2011 Mar; 177(3):288-300. PubMed ID: 21460538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. High relatedness in a social amoeba: the role of kin-discriminatory segregation.
    Gilbert OM; Strassmann JE; Queller DC
    Proc Biol Sci; 2012 Jul; 279(1738):2619-24. PubMed ID: 22357265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cheating does not explain selective differences at high and low relatedness in a social amoeba.
    Saxer G; Brock DA; Queller DC; Strassmann JE
    BMC Evol Biol; 2010 Mar; 10():76. PubMed ID: 20226060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genetic signatures of microbial altruism and cheating in social amoebas in the wild.
    Noh S; Geist KS; Tian X; Strassmann JE; Queller DC
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Mar; 115(12):3096-3101. PubMed ID: 29507206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Parallel evolution of the G protein-coupled receptor GrlG and the loss of fruiting body formation in the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum evolved under low relatedness.
    Walker LM; Sherpa RN; Ivaturi S; Brock DA; Larsen TJ; Walker JR; Strassmann JE; Queller DC
    G3 (Bethesda); 2023 Dec; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 37832511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genomic signatures of cooperation and conflict in the social amoeba.
    Ostrowski EA; Shen Y; Tian X; Sucgang R; Jiang H; Qu J; Katoh-Kurasawa M; Brock DA; Dinh C; Lara-Garduno F; Lee SL; Kovar CL; Dinh HH; Korchina V; Jackson L; Patil S; Han Y; Chaboub L; Shaulsky G; Muzny DM; Worley KC; Gibbs RA; Richards S; Kuspa A; Strassmann JE; Queller DC
    Curr Biol; 2015 Jun; 25(12):1661-5. PubMed ID: 26051890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Kin Discrimination in Dictyostelium Social Amoebae.
    Strassmann JE
    J Eukaryot Microbiol; 2016 May; 63(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 26909677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cooperation and conflict in the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum.
    Medina JM; Shreenidhi PM; Larsen TJ; Queller DC; Strassmann JE
    Int J Dev Biol; 2019; 63(8-9-10):371-382. PubMed ID: 31840776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Allopatric divergence of cooperators confers cheating resistance and limits effects of a defector mutation.
    Schaal KA; Yu YN; Vasse M; Velicer GJ
    BMC Ecol Evol; 2022 Dec; 22(1):141. PubMed ID: 36510120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.