BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17496558)

  • 1. A modified transfemoral approach using modular cementless revision stems.
    Fink B; Grossmann A; Schubring S; Schulz MS; Fuerst M
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Sep; 462():105-14. PubMed ID: 17496558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modified transfemoral approach to revision arthroplasty with uncemented modular revision stems.
    Fink B; Grossmann A
    Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2007 Mar; 19(1):32-55. PubMed ID: 17345026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Uncemented femoral revision arthroplasty using the modular revision prosthesis MRP-TITAN revision stem.
    Mumme T; Müller-Rath R; Andereya S; Wirtz DC
    Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2007 Mar; 19(1):56-77. PubMed ID: 17345027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Personal experience with the Wagner revision stem in hip joint reoperations].
    Cech O; Stehlík J; Krbec M; Vrecion V
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2001; 68(3):148-61. PubMed ID: 11706537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Long-term results of femoral revision with the Wagner Self-Locking stem.
    Regis D; Sandri A; Bonetti I
    Surg Technol Int; 2013 Sep; 23():243-50. PubMed ID: 24081844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Revision total hip arthroplasty in deficient proximal femur using a distal load-bearing prosthesis.
    Suominen S; Santavirta S
    Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1996; 85(3):253-62. PubMed ID: 8950449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cementless modular hip revision arthroplasty using the MRP Titan Revision Stem: outcome of 79 hips after an average of 4 years' follow-up.
    Schuh A; Werber S; Holzwarth U; Zeiler G
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2004 Jun; 124(5):306-9. PubMed ID: 15064958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Transfemoral implantation of the Wagner SL stem. The abolition of subsidence and enhancement of osteotomy union rate using Dall-Miles cables.
    Warren PJ; Thompson P; Fletcher MD
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2002 Dec; 122(9-10):557-60. PubMed ID: 12483345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The use of a hydroxyapatite-coated primary stem in revision total hip arthroplasty.
    Kelly SJ; Incavo SJ; Beynnon B
    J Arthroplasty; 2006 Jan; 21(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 16446187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Five- to 10-year results using a noncemented modular revision stem without bone grafting.
    Köster G; Walde TA; Willert HG
    J Arthroplasty; 2008 Oct; 23(7):964-70. PubMed ID: 18534480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Transfemoral Approach for Removal of Well-Fixed Femoral Stems in 2-Stage Septic Hip Revision.
    Fink B; Oremek D
    J Arthroplasty; 2016 May; 31(5):1065-71. PubMed ID: 26725137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Femoral revision with a fluted, tapered, modular stem seventy patients followed for a mean of 3.9 years.
    McInnis DP; Horne G; Devane PA
    J Arthroplasty; 2006 Apr; 21(3):372-80. PubMed ID: 16627145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Short-term results of hip revisions with a curved cementless modular stem in association with the surgical approach.
    Fink B; Grossmann A; Schubring S; Schulz MS; Fuerst M
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2009 Jan; 129(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 18389264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Femoral revision with the Wagner tapered stem: a ten- to 15-year follow-up study.
    Regis D; Sandri A; Bonetti I; Braggion M; Bartolozzi P
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Oct; 93(10):1320-6. PubMed ID: 21969429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impaction allografting for massive femoral defects in revision hip arthroplasty using collared textured stems.
    Van Kleunen JP; Anbari KK; Vu D; Garino JP
    J Arthroplasty; 2006 Apr; 21(3):362-71. PubMed ID: 16627144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cementless total hip arthroplasty using the modular S-ROM prosthesis combined with corrective proximal femoral osteotomy.
    Onodera S; Majima T; Ito H; Matsuno T; Kishimoto T; Minami A
    J Arthroplasty; 2006 Aug; 21(5):664-9. PubMed ID: 16877151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Femoral Bone Restoration Patterns in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Distally Fixed Modular Tapered Titanium Stems and an Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy Approach.
    Ladurner A; Zdravkovic V; Grob K
    J Arthroplasty; 2018 Jul; 33(7):2210-2217. PubMed ID: 29599032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of subsidence on straight and curved modular cementless revision stems in hip revision surgery.
    Fraile Suari A; Gil González S; Pérez Prieto D; León García A; Mestre Cortadellas C; Tey Pons M; Marqués López F
    Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol; 2017; 61(3):193-199. PubMed ID: 28385469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Early results of revision hip arthroplasty using modular Restoration stem].
    Nikratowicz P; Woźniak W; Kluczyński M; Wierusz-Kozłowska M
    Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol; 2011; 76(5):286-90. PubMed ID: 22420181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Two-year to five-year follow-up of femoral defects in femoral revision treated with the link MP modular stem.
    Rodriguez JA; Fada R; Murphy SB; Rasquinha VJ; Ranawat CS
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Aug; 24(5):751-8. PubMed ID: 18977637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.