BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17496646)

  • 1. Comparison of musical activities of cochlear implant users with different speech-coding strategies.
    Brockmeier SJ; Grasmeder M; Passow S; Mawmann D; Vischer M; Jappel A; Baumgartner W; Stark T; Müller J; Brill S; Steffens T; Strutz J; Kiefer J; Baumann U; Arnold W
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):49S-51S. PubMed ID: 17496646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Musical background not associated with self-perceived hearing performance or speech perception in postlingual cochlear-implant users.
    Fuller C; Free R; Maat B; Başkent D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1009-16. PubMed ID: 22894221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Music perception of cochlear implant users compared with that of hearing aid users.
    Looi V; McDermott H; McKay C; Hickson L
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):421-34. PubMed ID: 18344870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Musical perception and enjoyment in post-lingual patients with cochlear implants].
    Lassaletta L; Castro A; Bastarrica M; Pérez-Mora R; Herrán B; Sanz L; de Sarriá MJ; Gavilán J
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 2008 May; 59(5):228-34. PubMed ID: 18501158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Music recognition, music listening, and word recognition by deaf children with cochlear implants.
    Mitani C; Nakata T; Trehub SE; Kanda Y; Kumagami H; Takasaki K; Miyamoto I; Takahashi H
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):29S-33S. PubMed ID: 17496641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intra-individual assessment of speech and music perception in cochlear implant users with contralateral Cochlear™ and MED-EL™ systems.
    Harris RL; Gibson WP; Johnson M; Brew J; Bray M; Psarros C
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2011 Dec; 131(12):1270-8. PubMed ID: 22074105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Emotional and analytic music perception in cochlear implant users after optimizing the speech processor.
    Rosslau K; Spreckelmeyer KN; Saalfeld H; Westhofen M
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Jan; 132(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 22026456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The family oriented musical training for children with cochlear implants: speech and musical perception results of two year follow-up.
    Yucel E; Sennaroglu G; Belgin E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Jul; 73(7):1043-52. PubMed ID: 19411117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Recognition of "real-world" musical excerpts by cochlear implant recipients and normal-hearing adults.
    Gfeller K; Olszewski C; Rychener M; Sena K; Knutson JF; Witt S; Macpherson B
    Ear Hear; 2005 Jun; 26(3):237-50. PubMed ID: 15937406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of music perception in bilateral and unilateral cochlear implant users and normal-hearing subjects.
    Veekmans K; Ressel L; Mueller J; Vischer M; Brockmeier SJ
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14(5):315-26. PubMed ID: 19372650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Music and quality of life in early-deafened late-implanted adult cochlear implant users.
    Fuller C; Mallinckrodt L; Maat B; Başkent D; Free R
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Aug; 34(6):1041-7. PubMed ID: 23823145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Evaluation of rhythmic and timbral perception by normal-hearing and postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant users].
    Wang S; Dong RJ; Li J; Zhou Y; Qi BE; Chen XQ; Liu B
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Jun; 47(6):493-5. PubMed ID: 22932144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Changes in listening habits and quality of musical sound after cochlear implantation.
    Lassaletta L; Castro A; Bastarrica M; Pérez-Mora R; Herrán B; Sanz L; de Sarriá MJ; Gavilán J
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Mar; 138(3):363-7. PubMed ID: 18312886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech and music perception with the new fine structure speech coding strategy: preliminary results.
    Arnoldner C; Riss D; Brunner M; Durisin M; Baumgartner WD; Hamzavi JS
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2007 Dec; 127(12):1298-303. PubMed ID: 17851892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Music perception of cochlear implant users: a questionnaire, and its implications for a music training program.
    Looi V; She J
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Feb; 49(2):116-28. PubMed ID: 20151886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recognition of simulated telephone speech by cochlear implant users.
    Fu QJ; Galvin JJ
    Am J Audiol; 2006 Dec; 15(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 17182877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Emotional response to music by postlingually-deafened adult cochlear implant users].
    Wang S; Dong R; Zhou Y; Li J; Qi B; Liu B
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Oct; 26(19):879-81. PubMed ID: 23285951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Neurophysiological evidence of impaired musical sound perception in cochlear-implant users.
    Sandmann P; Kegel A; Eichele T; Dillier N; Lai W; Bendixen A; Debener S; Jancke L; Meyer M
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Dec; 121(12):2070-82. PubMed ID: 20570555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparisons of quality ratings for music by cochlear implant and hearing aid users.
    Looi V; McDermott H; McKay C; Hickson L
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):59S-61S. PubMed ID: 17496649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. New cochlear implant coding strategy for tonal language speakers.
    Wong LL; Vandali AE; Ciocca V; Luk B; Ip VW; Murray B; Yu HC; Chung I
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Jun; 47(6):337-47. PubMed ID: 18569106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.