These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17496646)

  • 21. Cochlear implant-mediated perception of music.
    Limb CJ
    Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2006 Oct; 14(5):337-40. PubMed ID: 16974148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effect of cochlear implantation on music perception by adults with usable pre-operative acoustic hearing.
    Looi V; McDermott H; McKay C; Hickson L
    Int J Audiol; 2008 May; 47(5):257-68. PubMed ID: 18465410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. From fragments to the whole: a comparison between cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners in music perception and enjoyment.
    Alexander AJ; Bartel L; Friesen L; Shipp D; Chen J
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2011 Feb; 40(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 21303594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Clinical trial results with the MED-EL fine structure processing coding strategy in experienced cochlear implant users.
    Müller J; Brill S; Hagen R; Moeltner A; Brockmeier SJ; Stark T; Helbig S; Maurer J; Zahnert T; Zierhofer C; Nopp P; Anderson I
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2012; 74(4):185-98. PubMed ID: 22814383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Music perception in cochlear implant users: an event-related potential study.
    Koelsch S; Wittfoth M; Wolf A; Müller J; Hahne A
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Apr; 115(4):966-72. PubMed ID: 15003780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Galvin KL; Mok M; Dowell RC
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):470-82. PubMed ID: 17609610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Multicentre evaluation of music perception in adult users of Advanced Bionics cochlear implants.
    Adams D; Ajimsha KM; Barberá MT; Gazibegovic D; Gisbert J; Gómez J; Raveh E; Rocca C; Romanet P; Seebens Y; Zarowski A
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 Jan; 15(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 24074504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Impact of Auditory-Motor Musical Training on Melodic Pattern Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Chari DA; Barrett KC; Patel AD; Colgrove TR; Jiradejvong P; Jacobs LY; Limb CJ
    Otol Neurotol; 2020 Apr; 41(4):e422-e431. PubMed ID: 32176126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Subjective benefits reported by adult Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant users.
    Kou BS; Shipp DB; Nedzelski JM
    J Otolaryngol; 1994 Feb; 23(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 8170029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The role of intensity upon pitch perception in cochlear implant recipients.
    Arnoldner C; Kaider A; Hamzavi J
    Laryngoscope; 2006 Oct; 116(10):1760-5. PubMed ID: 17003738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Song recognition by children and adolescents with cochlear implants.
    Vongpaisal T; Trehub SE; Schellenberg EG
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Oct; 49(5):1091-103. PubMed ID: 17077217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Melodic, rhythmic, and timbral perception of adult cochlear implant users.
    Gfeller K; Lansing CR
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Aug; 34(4):916-20. PubMed ID: 1956198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Self-reported music perception is related to quality of life and self-reported hearing abilities in cochlear implant users.
    Fuller C; Free R; Maat B; Başkent D
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2022 Jan; 23(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 34470590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Improved fundamental frequency coding in cochlear implant signal processing.
    Milczynski M; Wouters J; van Wieringen A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Apr; 125(4):2260-71. PubMed ID: 19354401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Horizontal-plane localization of noise and speech signals by postlingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Ricketts TA; Labadie RF; Haynes DS
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):524-41. PubMed ID: 17609614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Free field frequency discrimination abilities of cochlear implant users.
    Pretorius LL; Hanekom JJ
    Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 244(1-2):77-84. PubMed ID: 18692556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Does music perception have an impact on quality of life following cochlear implantation?
    Lassaletta L; Castro A; Bastarrica M; Pérez-Mora R; Madero R; De Sarriá J; Gavilán J
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2007 Jul; 127(7):682-6. PubMed ID: 17573562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Reestablishing speech understanding through musical ear training after cochlear implantation: a study of the potential cortical plasticity in the brain.
    Petersen B; Mortensen MV; Gjedde A; Vuust P
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2009 Jul; 1169():437-40. PubMed ID: 19673820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of Two Music Training Approaches on Music and Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Fuller CD; Galvin JJ; Maat B; Başkent D; Free RH
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518765379. PubMed ID: 29621947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.