263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17496647)
1. Performance of older adult cochlear implant users in Hong Kong.
Chan V; Tong M; Yue V; Wong T; Leung E; Yuen K; van Hasselt A
Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):52S-55S. PubMed ID: 17496647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 1-year postactivation results for sequentially implanted bilateral cochlear implant users.
Wolfe J; Baker S; Caraway T; Kasulis H; Mears A; Smith J; Swim L; Wood M
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):589-96. PubMed ID: 17667768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cochlear implant outcomes in adults and adolescents with early-onset hearing loss.
Caposecco A; Hickson L; Pedley K
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):209-20. PubMed ID: 21934504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Horizontal-plane localization of noise and speech signals by postlingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants.
Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Ricketts TA; Labadie RF; Haynes DS
Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):524-41. PubMed ID: 17609614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
Galvin KL; Mok M; Dowell RC
Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):470-82. PubMed ID: 17609610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Factors associated with development of speech perception skills in children implanted by age five.
Geers A; Brenner C; Davidson L
Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1 Suppl):24S-35S. PubMed ID: 12612478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Production and perception of speech intonation in pediatric cochlear implant recipients and individuals with normal hearing.
Peng SC; Tomblin JB; Turner CW
Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):336-51. PubMed ID: 18344873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of the growth of open-set speech perception between the nucleus 22 and nucleus 24 cochlear implant systems.
Waltzman SB; Cohen NL; Roland JT
Am J Otol; 1999 Jul; 20(4):435-41. PubMed ID: 10431883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Music perception of cochlear implant users compared with that of hearing aid users.
Looi V; McDermott H; McKay C; Hickson L
Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):421-34. PubMed ID: 18344870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Value of the promontory stimulation test in predicting speech perception after cochlear implantation.
Lee JC; Yoo MH; Ahn JH; Lee KS
Laryngoscope; 2007 Nov; 117(11):1988-92. PubMed ID: 17767084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Speech perception in congenitally, pre-lingually and post-lingually deaf children expressed in an equivalent hearing loss value.
Rotteveel LJ; Snik AF; Vermeulen AM; Cremers CW; Mylanus EA
Clin Otolaryngol; 2008 Dec; 33(6):560-9. PubMed ID: 19126130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Speech perception of children using Nucleus, Clarion or Med-El cochlear implants.
Taitelbaum-Swead R; Kishon-Rabin L; Kaplan-Neeman R; Muchnik C; Kronenberg J; Hildesheimer M
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2005 Dec; 69(12):1675-83. PubMed ID: 15955572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Speech intelligibility as a predictor of cochlear implant outcome in prelingually deafened adults.
van Dijkhuizen JN; Beers M; Boermans PP; Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):445-58. PubMed ID: 21258238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Speech recognition ability as a function of duration of deafness in multichannel cochlear implant patients.
Shea JJ; Domico EH; Orchik DJ
Laryngoscope; 1990 Mar; 100(3):223-6. PubMed ID: 2308444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Outcomes for cochlear implant users with significant residual hearing: implications for selection criteria in children.
Dowell RC; Hollow R; Winton E
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 May; 130(5):575-81. PubMed ID: 15148179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pediatric cochlear implantation in Taiwan: long-term communication outcomes.
Wang NM; Huang TS; Wu CM; Kirk KI
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Nov; 71(11):1775-82. PubMed ID: 17869350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Electrophysiological and speech perception measures of auditory processing in experienced adult cochlear implant users.
Kelly AS; Purdy SC; Thorne PR
Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 116(6):1235-46. PubMed ID: 15978485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is psychological status a determinant of speech perception outcomes in highly selected good adolescent cochlear implant users?
Yucel E; Sennaroglu G
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Sep; 71(9):1415-22. PubMed ID: 17586056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
