BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17496649)

  • 1. Comparisons of quality ratings for music by cochlear implant and hearing aid users.
    Looi V; McDermott H; McKay C; Hickson L
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):59S-61S. PubMed ID: 17496649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Music perception of cochlear implant users compared with that of hearing aid users.
    Looi V; McDermott H; McKay C; Hickson L
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):421-34. PubMed ID: 18344870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of cochlear implantation on music perception by adults with usable pre-operative acoustic hearing.
    Looi V; McDermott H; McKay C; Hickson L
    Int J Audiol; 2008 May; 47(5):257-68. PubMed ID: 18465410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of sound quality perception in cochlear implant users during music listening.
    Roy AT; Jiradejvong P; Carver C; Limb CJ
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Apr; 33(3):319-27. PubMed ID: 22314920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A music quality rating test battery for cochlear implant users to compare the FSP and HDCIS strategies for music appreciation.
    Looi V; Winter P; Anderson I; Sucher C
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Aug; 50(8):503-18. PubMed ID: 21689048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hearing handicap ratings among different profiles of adult cochlear implant users.
    Noble W; Tyler R; Dunn C; Bhullar N
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jan; 29(1):112-20. PubMed ID: 18091100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Music Appreciation of Adult Hearing Aid Users and the Impact of Different Levels of Hearing Loss.
    Looi V; Rutledge K; Prvan T
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(3):529-544. PubMed ID: 30096062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The family oriented musical training for children with cochlear implants: speech and musical perception results of two year follow-up.
    Yucel E; Sennaroglu G; Belgin E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Jul; 73(7):1043-52. PubMed ID: 19411117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perception of musical timbre by cochlear implant listeners: a multidimensional scaling study.
    Macherey O; Delpierre A
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(4):426-36. PubMed ID: 23334356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development of a large-item environmental sound test and the effects of short-term training with spectrally-degraded stimuli.
    Shafiro V
    Ear Hear; 2008 Oct; 29(5):775-90. PubMed ID: 18596641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Music perception of cochlear implant users: a questionnaire, and its implications for a music training program.
    Looi V; She J
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Feb; 49(2):116-28. PubMed ID: 20151886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pitch ranking of complex tones by normally hearing subjects and cochlear implant users.
    Sucher CM; McDermott HJ
    Hear Res; 2007 Aug; 230(1-2):80-7. PubMed ID: 17604582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The reception of environmental sounds through wearable tactual Aids.
    Reed CM; Delhorne LA
    Ear Hear; 2003 Dec; 24(6):528-38. PubMed ID: 14663352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hearing progress and fluctuations in bimodal-binaural hearing users (unilateral cochlear implants and contralateral hearing aid).
    Luntz M; Yehudai N; Shpak T
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2007 Oct; 127(10):1045-50. PubMed ID: 17851963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does music perception have an impact on quality of life following cochlear implantation?
    Lassaletta L; Castro A; Bastarrica M; Pérez-Mora R; Madero R; De Sarriá J; Gavilán J
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2007 Jul; 127(7):682-6. PubMed ID: 17573562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality of life in hearing-impaired adults: the role of cochlear implants and hearing aids.
    Cohen SM; Labadie RF; Dietrich MS; Haynes DS
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 Oct; 131(4):413-22. PubMed ID: 15467610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing binaural/bimodal advantages using auditory event-related potentials in subjects with cochlear implants.
    Sasaki T; Yamamoto K; Iwaki T; Kubo T
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2009 Oct; 36(5):541-6. PubMed ID: 19297109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How much residual hearing is 'useful' for music perception with cochlear implants?
    El Fata F; James CJ; Laborde ML; Fraysse B
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14 Suppl 1():14-21. PubMed ID: 19390171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Music perception and appraisal: cochlear implant users and simulated cochlear implant listening.
    Wright R; Uchanski RM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 May; 23(5):350-65; quiz 379. PubMed ID: 22533978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Emotional and analytic music perception in cochlear implant users after optimizing the speech processor.
    Rosslau K; Spreckelmeyer KN; Saalfeld H; Westhofen M
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Jan; 132(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 22026456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.