447 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17496666)
1. Effect of training rate on recognition of spectrally shifted speech.
Nogaki G; Fu QJ; Galvin JJ
Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):132-40. PubMed ID: 17496666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Auditory training with spectrally shifted speech: implications for cochlear implant patient auditory rehabilitation.
Fu QJ; Nogaki G; Galvin JJ
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 6(2):180-9. PubMed ID: 15952053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interactions between unsupervised learning and the degree of spectral mismatch on short-term perceptual adaptation to spectrally shifted speech.
Li T; Galvin JJ; Fu QJ
Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):238-49. PubMed ID: 19194293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.
Donaldson GS; Kreft HA
Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Perceptual adaptation to spectrally shifted vowels: training with nonlexical labels.
Li T; Fu QJ
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2007 Mar; 8(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 17131213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development of a large-item environmental sound test and the effects of short-term training with spectrally-degraded stimuli.
Shafiro V
Ear Hear; 2008 Oct; 29(5):775-90. PubMed ID: 18596641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Perception of temporally processed speech by listeners with hearing impairment.
Calandruccio L; Doherty KA; Carney LH; Kikkeri HN
Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):512-23. PubMed ID: 17609613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effects of short-term training for spectrally mismatched noise-band speech.
Fu QJ; Galvin JJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Feb; 113(2):1065-72. PubMed ID: 12597199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.
Friesen LM; Shannon RV; Baskent D; Wang X
J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1150-63. PubMed ID: 11519582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The relative importance of consonant and vowel segments to the recognition of words and sentences: effects of age and hearing loss.
Fogerty D; Kewley-Port D; Humes LE
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1667-78. PubMed ID: 22978895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Transfer of auditory perceptual learning with spectrally reduced speech to speech and nonspeech tasks: implications for cochlear implants.
Loebach JL; Pisoni DB; Svirsky MA
Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):662-74. PubMed ID: 19773659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of presentation level on phoneme and sentence recognition in quiet by cochlear implant listeners.
Donaldson GS; Allen SL
Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):392-405. PubMed ID: 14534410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Phoneme recognition in vocoded maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
Phatak SA; Grant KW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):859-66. PubMed ID: 25096119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Contribution of consonant landmarks to speech recognition in simulated acoustic-electric hearing.
Chen F; Loizou PC
Ear Hear; 2010 Apr; 31(2):259-67. PubMed ID: 20081538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Spectral and temporal cues in cochlear implant speech perception.
Nie K; Barco A; Zeng FG
Ear Hear; 2006 Apr; 27(2):208-17. PubMed ID: 16518146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Speech recognition by normal-hearing and cochlear implant listeners as a function of intensity resolution.
Loizou PC; Dorman M; Poroy O; Spahr T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Nov; 108(5 Pt 1):2377-87. PubMed ID: 11108378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Vowel identification by cochlear implant users: contributions of static and dynamic spectral cues.
Donaldson GS; Rogers CL; Cardenas ES; Russell BA; Hanna NH
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):3021-8. PubMed ID: 24116437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reducing Simulated Channel Interaction Reveals Differences in Phoneme Identification Between Children and Adults With Normal Hearing.
Jahn KN; DiNino M; Arenberg JG
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(2):295-311. PubMed ID: 29927780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computer-based auditory phoneme discrimination training improves speech recognition in noise in experienced adult cochlear implant listeners.
Schumann A; Serman M; Gefeller O; Hoppe U
Int J Audiol; 2015 Mar; 54(3):190-8. PubMed ID: 25549690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
