These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17497504)

  • 1. Beyond the human neuron mouse to the NAS Guidelines.
    Cohen CB
    Am J Bioeth; 2007 May; 7(5):46-9. PubMed ID: 17497504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Human embryonic stem cell research: an argument for national research review.
    Baylis F; Robert JS
    Account Res; 2006; 13(3):207-24. PubMed ID: 17124758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stem cell protocols: the NAS guidelines are a useful start.
    Johnston J
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2005; 35(6):16-7. PubMed ID: 16396200
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stem cell politics: the NAS prohibitions pack more bark than bite.
    Robert JS; Baylis F
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2005; 35(6):15-6. PubMed ID: 16396199
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bioterrorism. NAS censors report on agriculture threats.
    Mervis J; Stokstad E
    Science; 2002 Sep; 297(5589):1973-5. PubMed ID: 12242412
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Research ethics. The NIH draft guidelines on human stem cell research.
    Majumder MA; Cohen CB
    Science; 2009 Jun; 324(5935):1648-9. PubMed ID: 19556488
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. NAS asks for more scrutiny of GM crops.
    Stokstad E
    Science; 2002 Mar; 295(5560):1619-20. PubMed ID: 11872806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. U.S. national academies. Advice on science advising leaves plenty of questions.
    Mervis J
    Science; 2004 Nov; 306(5701):1450-1. PubMed ID: 15567817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Toxicology. Academy panel mulls ethics of human pesticide experiments.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2003 Jan; 299(5605):327-9. PubMed ID: 12531989
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ethics. Testing pesticides on humans given qualified endorsement.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2004 Feb; 303(5662):1272-3. PubMed ID: 14988526
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Thinking about the human neuron mouse.
    Greely HT; Cho MK; Hogle LF; Satz DM
    Am J Bioeth; 2007 May; 7(5):27-40. PubMed ID: 17497502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Animal biotechnology. Environmental impact seen as biggest risk.
    Stokstad E
    Science; 2002 Aug; 297(5585):1257. PubMed ID: 12193761
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Report censures political screening of advisory boards.
    Brumfiel G
    Nature; 2004 Nov; 432(7016):425. PubMed ID: 15565116
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Of mice and men.
    Rollin BE
    Am J Bioeth; 2007 May; 7(5):55-7. PubMed ID: 17497508
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Scientists in the sunshine.
    Dresser R
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1997; 27(6):26-8. PubMed ID: 9474492
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genetically modified organisms. Experts recommend a cautious approach.
    Stokstad E
    Science; 2004 Jan; 303(5657):449. PubMed ID: 14739429
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ethics. Human health research ethics.
    Silbergeld E; Lerman S; Hushka L
    Science; 2004 Aug; 305(5686):949. PubMed ID: 15310879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Life sciences. A new biology to mend society's woes.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2009 Sep; 325(5948):1609. PubMed ID: 19779161
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Science, terrorism, and natural disasters.
    Kennedy D
    Science; 2002 Jan; 295(5554):405. PubMed ID: 11799206
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bio2010 misinterpreted?
    Alberts B
    Science; 2003 Nov; 302(5650):1504. PubMed ID: 14645827
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.