These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17498135)

  • 61. Can roads be used as transects for primate population surveys?
    Hilário RR; Rodrigues FH; Chiarello AG; Mourthé I
    Folia Primatol (Basel); 2012; 83(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 22854794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Effects of site-selection bias on estimates of biodiversity change.
    Mentges A; Blowes SA; Hodapp D; Hillebrand H; Chase JM
    Conserv Biol; 2021 Apr; 35(2):688-698. PubMed ID: 32808693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Incorporating spatial criteria in optimum reserve network selection.
    Onal H; Briers RA
    Proc Biol Sci; 2002 Dec; 269(1508):2437-41. PubMed ID: 12495486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Circumscription of Botryosphaeria species associated with Proteaceae based on morphology and DNA sequence data.
    Denman S; Crous PW; Groenewald JZ; Slippers B; Wingfield BD; Wingfield MJ
    Mycologia; 2003; 95(2):294-307. PubMed ID: 21156615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Effects of publication bias on conservation planning.
    Hickisch R; Hodgetts T; Johnson PJ; Sillero-Zubiri C; Tockner K; Macdonald DW
    Conserv Biol; 2019 Oct; 33(5):1151-1163. PubMed ID: 30957293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Using presence-absence data to establish reserve selection procedures that are robust to temporal species turnover.
    Rodrigues AS; Gaston KJ; Gregory RD
    Proc Biol Sci; 2000 May; 267(1446):897-902. PubMed ID: 10853732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. [Mammals of "La Sepultura" Biosphere Reserve, Chiapas, México].
    Espinoza Medinilla E; Cruz E; Lira I; Sánchez I
    Rev Biol Trop; 2004 Mar; 52(1):249-59. PubMed ID: 17357423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Referent sampling, family history and relative risk: the role of length-biased sampling.
    Davidov O; Zelen M
    Biostatistics; 2001 Jun; 2(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 12933548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Priority areas for anuran conservation using biogeographical data: a comparison of greedy, rarity, and simulated annealing algorithms to define reserve networks in cerrado.
    Diniz-Filho JA; Bini LM; Bastos RP; Vieira CM; Vieira LC
    Braz J Biol; 2005 May; 65(2):251-61. PubMed ID: 16097727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Nature reserve selection problem: a tight approximation algorithm.
    Bordewich M; Semple C
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2008; 5(2):275-80. PubMed ID: 18451436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Evaluating β Diversity as a Surrogate for Species Representation at Fine Scale.
    Beier P; Albuquerque F
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0151048. PubMed ID: 26943170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Determination of the chemical potential using energy-biased sampling.
    Delgado-Buscalioni R; De Fabritiis G; Coveney PV
    J Chem Phys; 2005 Aug; 123(5):054105. PubMed ID: 16108629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Mapping species distributions with MAXENT using a geographically biased sample of presence data: a performance assessment of methods for correcting sampling bias.
    Fourcade Y; Engler JO; Rödder D; Secondi J
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(5):e97122. PubMed ID: 24818607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Differences in Movement Pattern and Detectability between Males and Females Influence How Common Sampling Methods Estimate Sex Ratio.
    Rodrigues JF; Coelho MT
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0159736. PubMed ID: 27441554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Finding the tradeoffs between the reserve design and representation.
    Rothley KD
    Environ Manage; 2006 Sep; 38(3):327-37. PubMed ID: 16688511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. A novel method to handle the effect of uneven sampling effort in biodiversity databases.
    Pardo I; Pata MP; Gómez D; García MB
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(1):e52786. PubMed ID: 23326357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. The principle of complementarity in the design of reserve networks to conserve biodiversity: a preliminary history.
    Justus J; Sarkar S
    J Biosci; 2002 Jul; 27(4 Suppl 2):421-35. PubMed ID: 12177539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Importance and effectiveness of correction methods for spatial sampling bias in species with sex-specific habitat preference.
    Glad A; Monnet JM; Pagel J; Reineking B
    Ecol Evol; 2019 Dec; 9(23):13188-13201. PubMed ID: 31871638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Ensemble distribution models in conservation prioritization: from consensus predictions to consensus reserve networks.
    Meller L; Cabeza M; Pironon S; Barbet-Massin M; Maiorano L; Georges D; Thuiller W
    Divers Distrib; 2014 Mar; 20(3):309-321. PubMed ID: 24791145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Selection of a minimum-boundary reserve network using integer programming.
    Onal H; Briers RA
    Proc Biol Sci; 2003 Jul; 270(1523):1487-91. PubMed ID: 12965014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.