These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1749846)

  • 21. Operational radiologic image archive on digital optical disks.
    Mankovich NJ; Taira RK; Cho PS; Huang HK
    Radiology; 1988 Apr; 167(1):139-42. PubMed ID: 3347715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Computed radiography: photostimulable phosphor image plate technology.
    Long BW
    Radiol Technol; 1989; 61(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 2587727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Image quality and dose management in digital radiography: a new paradigm for optimisation.
    Busch HP; Faulkner K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):143-7. PubMed ID: 16461521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Digital storage phosphor radiography. Doses and image quality].
    Salvini E; Pedroli G; Montanari G; Pastori R; Crespi A; Zincone G
    Radiol Med; 1994 Jun; 87(6):847-51. PubMed ID: 8041940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Digitization of radiologic images.
    Macis G; Meduri A; Parrella A; Pesti E
    Rays; 1996; 21(2):196-211. PubMed ID: 8685400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [New analog and digital imaging techniques for chest diagnosis--principles--clinical value--economics].
    Busch HP; Lehmann KJ; Georgi M
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Jan; 3(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 8448232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Imaging: new versus traditional technological aids.
    Sanderink GC
    Int Dent J; 1993 Aug; 43(4):335-42. PubMed ID: 8276517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Comparative contrast media studies using conventional film-screen systems and digital luminescence radiography].
    Christiansen GR; Marks W; Münster F; Prüss H; Quirin A
    Rontgenblatter; 1990 Apr; 43(4):157-62. PubMed ID: 2339258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cost of managing digital diagnostic images for a 614-bed hospital.
    Dwyer SJ; Templeton AW; Martin NL; Cook LT; Lee KR; Levine E; Batnitzky S; Preston DF; Rosenthal SJ; Price HI; Anderson WH; Tarlton MA; Faszold S
    J Digit Imaging; 2002 Dec; 15(4):255-60. PubMed ID: 12612789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Interpretation accuracy of a CCD film digitizer.
    Gitlin JN; Scott WW; Bell K; Narayan A
    J Digit Imaging; 2002; 15 Suppl 1(2):57-63. PubMed ID: 12105698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Digital radiography for clinical applications.
    Busch HP
    Eur Radiol; 1997; 7 Suppl 3():S66-72. PubMed ID: 9169104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Chest radiographic image quality: comparison of asymmetric screen-film, digital storage phosphor, and digital selenium drum systems--preliminary study.
    Beute GH; Flynn MJ; Eyler WR; Samei E; Spizarny DL; Zylak CJ
    Radiographics; 1998; 18(3):745-54. PubMed ID: 9599395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Direct digital radiography in the dental office.
    Wenzel A; Gröndahl HG
    Int Dent J; 1995 Feb; 45(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 7607741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Portable chest imaging: comparison of storage phosphor digital, asymmetric screen-film, and conventional screen-film systems.
    Niklason LT; Chan HP; Cascade PN; Chang CL; Chee PW; Mathews JF
    Radiology; 1993 Feb; 186(2):387-93. PubMed ID: 8421740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Digital imaging and picture archiving and communication systems.
    Lissner J; Fink U
    Curr Opin Radiol; 1991 Apr; 3(2):267-74. PubMed ID: 2049276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Digital chest radiography at the University of Chicago: present status and future plans.
    MacMahon H
    J Digit Imaging; 1995 Feb; 8(1 Suppl 1):11-4. PubMed ID: 7734531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks on conventional film, hardcopy, and monitor-displayed images obtained by the storage phosphor technique.
    Geelen W; Wenzel A; Gotfredsen E; Kruger M; Hansson LG
    Eur J Orthod; 1998 Jun; 20(3):331-40. PubMed ID: 9699411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparative reject analysis in conventional film-screen and digital storage phosphor radiography.
    Peer S; Peer R; Walcher M; Pohl M; Jaschke W
    Eur Radiol; 1999; 9(8):1693-6. PubMed ID: 10525892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Digital image intensifier radiography: a new concept for traumatologic x-ray diagnosis?].
    Schmidt C; Deininger HK
    Rofo; 1990 Jan; 152(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 2154009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Digital radiography.
    Mattoon JS
    Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2006; 19(3):123-32. PubMed ID: 16971994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.