BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

407 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17499089)

  • 1. Intraoral determination of the tolerance of dentists for perceptibility and acceptability of shade mismatch.
    Douglas RD; Steinhauer TJ; Wee AG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Apr; 97(4):200-8. PubMed ID: 17499089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of perceptibility and acceptability of color difference of denture teeth.
    Alghazali N; Burnside G; Moallem M; Smith P; Preston A; Jarad FD
    J Dent; 2012 Jul; 40 Suppl 1():e10-7. PubMed ID: 22561647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Defining a natural tooth color space based on a 3-dimensional shade system.
    Yuan JC; Brewer JD; Monaco EA; Davis EL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Aug; 98(2):110-9. PubMed ID: 17692592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual and instrumental evaluation of color match ability of 2 shade guides on a ceramic system.
    Öngül D; Şermet B; Balkaya MC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Jul; 108(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 22765984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical evaluation of perceptibility of color differences between natural teeth and all-ceramic crowns.
    Ishikawa-Nagai S; Yoshida A; Sakai M; Kristiansen J; Da Silva JD
    J Dent; 2009; 37 Suppl 1():e57-63. PubMed ID: 19423209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical performance of a newly developed spectrophotometric system on tooth color reproduction.
    Da Silva JD; Park SE; Weber HP; Ishikawa-Nagai S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 May; 99(5):361-8. PubMed ID: 18456047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of self shade matching ability of dental students using visual and instrumental means.
    Alsaleh S; Labban M; AlHariri M; Tashkandi E
    J Dent; 2012 Jul; 40 Suppl 1():e82-7. PubMed ID: 22306532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Color differences: polymerized composite and corresponding Vitapan Classical shade tab.
    Browning WD; Contreras-Bulnes R; Brackett MG; Brackett WW
    J Dent; 2009; 37 Suppl 1():e34-9. PubMed ID: 19500895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Color difference thresholds of maxillofacial skin replications.
    Paravina RD; Majkic G; Del Mar Perez M; Kiat-Amnuay S
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Oct; 18(7):618-25. PubMed ID: 19432759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vivo spectroradiometric evaluation of colour matching errors among five shade guides.
    Li Q; Yu H; Wang YN
    J Oral Rehabil; 2009 Jan; 36(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 18976272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Correlations between color differences based on three color-difference formulas using dental shade guide tabs.
    Kim JG; Yu B; Lee YK
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 19054306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of visual shade determination and an intra-oral dental colourimeter.
    Yilmaz B; Karaagaclioglu L
    J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Oct; 35(10):789-94. PubMed ID: 18466278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of shade matching by visual observation and an intraoral dental colorimeter.
    Li Q; Wang YN
    J Oral Rehabil; 2007 Nov; 34(11):848-54. PubMed ID: 17919252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Factors influencing the shade matching performance of dentists and dental technicians when using two different shade guides.
    Alomari M; Chadwick RG
    Br Dent J; 2011 Dec; 211(11):E23. PubMed ID: 22158197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of illuminants on the color distribution of shade guides.
    Park JH; Lee YK; Lim BS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Dec; 96(6):402-11. PubMed ID: 17174657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimization of tooth color and shade guide design.
    Paravina RD; Majkic G; Imai FH; Powers JM
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):269-76. PubMed ID: 17451478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual and instrumental agreement in dental shade selection: three distinct observer populations and shade matching protocols.
    Della Bona A; Barrett AA; Rosa V; Pinzetta C
    Dent Mater; 2009 Feb; 25(2):276-81. PubMed ID: 19019420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of a porcelain color discrimination test to evaluate color difference formulas.
    Wee AG; Lindsey DT; Shroyer KM; Johnston WM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Aug; 98(2):101-9. PubMed ID: 17692591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performance of five commercially available tooth color-measuring devices.
    Dozić A; Kleverlaan CJ; El-Zohairy A; Feilzer AJ; Khashayar G
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 17362418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The use of objective digital matching to achieve an esthetic composite restoration.
    Jarad FD; Albadri SS; Mair LH
    J Clin Dent; 2008; 19(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 18500153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.