BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17499223)

  • 1. Synchronizing timelines: relations between fixation durations and N400 amplitudes during sentence reading.
    Dambacher M; Kliegl R
    Brain Res; 2007 Jun; 1155():147-62. PubMed ID: 17499223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials.
    Simola J; Holmqvist K; Lindgren M
    Brain Lang; 2009 Nov; 111(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 19782390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of frequency and predictability on eye fixations in reading: implications for the E-Z Reader model.
    Rayner K; Ashby J; Pollatsek A; Reichle ED
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Aug; 30(4):720-32. PubMed ID: 15301620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Frequency and predictability effects on event-related potentials during reading.
    Dambacher M; Kliegl R; Hofmann M; Jacobs AM
    Brain Res; 2006 Apr; 1084(1):89-103. PubMed ID: 16545344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The distribution of fixation durations during reading: effects of stimulus quality.
    White SJ; Staub A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Jun; 38(3):603-17. PubMed ID: 21910560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Coregistration of eye movements and EEG in natural reading: analyses and review.
    Dimigen O; Sommer W; Hohlfeld A; Jacobs AM; Kliegl R
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 Nov; 140(4):552-72. PubMed ID: 21744985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Eye-movement models for arithmetic and reading performance.
    Suppes P
    Rev Oculomot Res; 1990; 4():455-77. PubMed ID: 7492535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Parafoveal-on-foveal effects on eye movements in text reading: does an extra space make a difference?
    Drieghe D; Brysbaert M; Desmet T
    Vision Res; 2005 Jun; 45(13):1693-706. PubMed ID: 15792844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dissociating parafoveal preview benefit and parafovea-on-fovea effects during reading: A combined eye tracking and EEG study.
    Niefind F; Dimigen O
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Dec; 53(12):1784-1798. PubMed ID: 27680711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tracking the mind during reading: the influence of past, present, and future words on fixation durations.
    Kliegl R; Nuthmann A; Engbert R
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 Feb; 135(1):12-35. PubMed ID: 16478314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Parafoveal load of word N+1 modulates preprocessing effectiveness of word N+2 in Chinese reading.
    Yan M; Kliegl R; Shu H; Pan J; Zhou X
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1669-76. PubMed ID: 20731511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is attention confined to one word at a time? The spatial distribution of parafoveal preview benefits during reading.
    Wang CA; Inhoff AW; Radach R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Oct; 71(7):1487-94. PubMed ID: 19801609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of word frequency, word predictability, and font difficulty on the eye movements of young and older readers.
    Rayner K; Reichle ED; Stroud MJ; Williams CC; Pollatsek A
    Psychol Aging; 2006 Sep; 21(3):448-65. PubMed ID: 16953709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Eye movements of highly skilled and average readers: differential effects of frequency and predictability.
    Ashby J; Rayner K; Clifton C
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 Aug; 58(6):1065-86. PubMed ID: 16194948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dissociating word frequency and predictability effects in reading: Evidence from coregistration of eye movements and EEG.
    Kretzschmar F; Schlesewsky M; Staub A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Nov; 41(6):1648-62. PubMed ID: 26010829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Trans-saccadic parafoveal preview benefits in fluent reading: a study with fixation-related brain potentials.
    Dimigen O; Kliegl R; Sommer W
    Neuroimage; 2012 Aug; 62(1):381-93. PubMed ID: 22521255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Parafoveal versus foveal N400s dissociate spreading activation from contextual fit.
    Kretzschmar F; Bornkessel-Schlesewsky I; Schlesewsky M
    Neuroreport; 2009 Dec; 20(18):1613-8. PubMed ID: 19884865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Eye movement control during reading: Effects of word frequency and orthographic familiarity.
    White SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Feb; 34(1):205-23. PubMed ID: 18248149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A perceptual-economy account for the inverted-optimal viewing position effect.
    Vitu F; Lancelin D; Marrier d'Unienville V
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Oct; 33(5):1220-49. PubMed ID: 17924819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Eye movements when reading disappearing text: is there a gap effect in reading?
    Liversedge SP; Rayner K; White SJ; Vergilino-Perez D; Findlay JM; Kentridge RW
    Vision Res; 2004 May; 44(10):1013-24. PubMed ID: 15031094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.