465 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17499306)
1. Standard versus limited pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer in patients with a predicted probability of nodal metastasis greater than 1%.
Touijer K; Rabbani F; Otero JR; Secin FP; Eastham JA; Scardino PT; Guillonneau B
J Urol; 2007 Jul; 178(1):120-4. PubMed ID: 17499306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Extended pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: high incidence of lymph node metastasis.
Heidenreich A; Varga Z; Von Knobloch R
J Urol; 2002 Apr; 167(4):1681-6. PubMed ID: 11912387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detecting lymph nodes metastasis in prostate cancer through extended vs. standard laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy.
Arenas LF; Füllhase C; Boemans P; Fichtner J
Aktuelle Urol; 2010 Jan; 41 Suppl 1():S10-4. PubMed ID: 20094944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laparoscopic extended pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer: description of the surgical technique and initial results.
Lattouf JB; Beri A; Jeschke S; Sega W; Leeb K; Janetschek G
Eur Urol; 2007 Nov; 52(5):1347-55. PubMed ID: 17507150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of surgical volume on the rate of lymph node metastases in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection for clinically localized prostate cancer.
Briganti A; Capitanio U; Chun FK; Gallina A; Suardi N; Salonia A; Da Pozzo LF; Colombo R; Di Girolamo V; Bertini R; Guazzoni G; Karakiewicz PI; Montorsi F; Rigatti P
Eur Urol; 2008 Oct; 54(4):794-802. PubMed ID: 18514383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is a limited lymphadenectomy targeting obturator nodes alone an adequate procedure for Japanese men undergoing radical prostatectomy?
Miyake H; Sakai I; Harada K; Hara I; Eto H
Int J Urol; 2005 Aug; 12(8):739-44. PubMed ID: 16174048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of a nomogram predicting the probability of lymph node invasion based on the extent of pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer.
Briganti A; Chun FK; Salonia A; Gallina A; Farina E; Da Pozzo LF; Rigatti P; Montorsi F; Karakiewicz PI
BJU Int; 2006 Oct; 98(4):788-93. PubMed ID: 16796698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Critical assessment of ideal nodal yield at pelvic lymphadenectomy to accurately diagnose prostate cancer nodal metastasis in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Briganti A; Chun FK; Salonia A; Gallina A; Zanni G; Scattoni V; Valiquette L; Rigatti P; Montorsi F; Karakiewicz PI
Urology; 2007 Jan; 69(1):147-51. PubMed ID: 17270638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Radical cystectomy and extended pelvic lymphadenectomy: survival of patients with lymph node metastasis above the bifurcation of the common iliac vessels treated with surgery only.
Steven K; Poulsen AL
J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1218-23; discussion 1223-4. PubMed ID: 17698113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [The role of pelvic lymphadenectomy in the therapy of prostate and bladder cancer].
Heidenreich A; Ohlmann CH
Aktuelle Urol; 2005 Jun; 36(3):219-29. PubMed ID: 16001337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Limited pelvic lymph node dissection at the time of radical prostatectomy does not affect 5-year failure rates for low, intermediate and high risk prostate cancer: results from CaPSURE.
Berglund RK; Sadetsky N; DuChane J; Carroll PR; Klein EA
J Urol; 2007 Feb; 177(2):526-29; discussion 529-30. PubMed ID: 17222625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laparoscopic extended pelvic lymph node dissection for high-risk prostate cancer.
Wyler SF; Sulser T; Seifert HH; Ruszat R; Forster TH; Gasser TC; Bachmann A
Urology; 2006 Oct; 68(4):883-7. PubMed ID: 17070376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sentinel lymph node dissection for prostate cancer: experience with more than 1,000 patients.
Weckermann D; Dorn R; Trefz M; Wagner T; Wawroschek F; Harzmann R
J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):916-20. PubMed ID: 17296375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pelvic node dissection in prostate cancer: extended, limited, or not at all?
Hyndman ME; Mullins JK; Pavlovich CP
Curr Opin Urol; 2010 May; 20(3):211-7. PubMed ID: 20224412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic extended pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer: surgical technique and experience with the first 99 cases.
Feicke A; Baumgartner M; Talimi S; Schmid DM; Seifert HH; Müntener M; Fatzer M; Sulser T; Strebel RT
Eur Urol; 2009 Apr; 55(4):876-83. PubMed ID: 19101076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Seminal vesicle biopsy and laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection: implications for patient selection in the radiotherapeutic management of prostate cancer.
Stock RG; Stone NN; Ianuzzi C; Unger P
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 Nov; 33(4):815-21. PubMed ID: 7591888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robotic extended pelvic lymphadenectomy for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer.
Yuh BE; Ruel NH; Mejia R; Wilson CM; Wilson TG
Eur Urol; 2012 May; 61(5):1004-10. PubMed ID: 22366188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Lymph node dissection during robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: comparison of lymph node yield and clinical outcomes when including common iliac nodes with standard template dissection.
Katz DJ; Yee DS; Godoy G; Nogueira L; Chong KT; Coleman JA
BJU Int; 2010 Aug; 106(3):391-6. PubMed ID: 20089113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection following definitive radiotherapy for carcinoma of the prostate.
Lund GO; Winfield HN; Donovan JF; See WA; Loening SA; Williams RD
J Urol; 1997 Feb; 157(2):548-51. PubMed ID: 8996353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A preoperative nomogram identifying decreased risk of positive pelvic lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer.
Cagiannos I; Karakiewicz P; Eastham JA; Ohori M; Rabbani F; Gerigk C; Reuter V; Graefen M; Hammerer PG; Erbersdobler A; Huland H; Kupelian P; Klein E; Quinn DI; Henshall SM; Grygiel JJ; Sutherland RL; Stricker PD; Morash CG; Scardino PT; Kattan MW
J Urol; 2003 Nov; 170(5):1798-803. PubMed ID: 14532779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]