These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
460 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17499306)
1. Standard versus limited pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer in patients with a predicted probability of nodal metastasis greater than 1%. Touijer K; Rabbani F; Otero JR; Secin FP; Eastham JA; Scardino PT; Guillonneau B J Urol; 2007 Jul; 178(1):120-4. PubMed ID: 17499306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Extended pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: high incidence of lymph node metastasis. Heidenreich A; Varga Z; Von Knobloch R J Urol; 2002 Apr; 167(4):1681-6. PubMed ID: 11912387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detecting lymph nodes metastasis in prostate cancer through extended vs. standard laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy. Arenas LF; Füllhase C; Boemans P; Fichtner J Aktuelle Urol; 2010 Jan; 41 Suppl 1():S10-4. PubMed ID: 20094944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laparoscopic extended pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer: description of the surgical technique and initial results. Lattouf JB; Beri A; Jeschke S; Sega W; Leeb K; Janetschek G Eur Urol; 2007 Nov; 52(5):1347-55. PubMed ID: 17507150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of surgical volume on the rate of lymph node metastases in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection for clinically localized prostate cancer. Briganti A; Capitanio U; Chun FK; Gallina A; Suardi N; Salonia A; Da Pozzo LF; Colombo R; Di Girolamo V; Bertini R; Guazzoni G; Karakiewicz PI; Montorsi F; Rigatti P Eur Urol; 2008 Oct; 54(4):794-802. PubMed ID: 18514383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is a limited lymphadenectomy targeting obturator nodes alone an adequate procedure for Japanese men undergoing radical prostatectomy? Miyake H; Sakai I; Harada K; Hara I; Eto H Int J Urol; 2005 Aug; 12(8):739-44. PubMed ID: 16174048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of a nomogram predicting the probability of lymph node invasion based on the extent of pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. Briganti A; Chun FK; Salonia A; Gallina A; Farina E; Da Pozzo LF; Rigatti P; Montorsi F; Karakiewicz PI BJU Int; 2006 Oct; 98(4):788-93. PubMed ID: 16796698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Critical assessment of ideal nodal yield at pelvic lymphadenectomy to accurately diagnose prostate cancer nodal metastasis in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy. Briganti A; Chun FK; Salonia A; Gallina A; Zanni G; Scattoni V; Valiquette L; Rigatti P; Montorsi F; Karakiewicz PI Urology; 2007 Jan; 69(1):147-51. PubMed ID: 17270638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Radical cystectomy and extended pelvic lymphadenectomy: survival of patients with lymph node metastasis above the bifurcation of the common iliac vessels treated with surgery only. Steven K; Poulsen AL J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1218-23; discussion 1223-4. PubMed ID: 17698113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [The role of pelvic lymphadenectomy in the therapy of prostate and bladder cancer]. Heidenreich A; Ohlmann CH Aktuelle Urol; 2005 Jun; 36(3):219-29. PubMed ID: 16001337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Limited pelvic lymph node dissection at the time of radical prostatectomy does not affect 5-year failure rates for low, intermediate and high risk prostate cancer: results from CaPSURE. Berglund RK; Sadetsky N; DuChane J; Carroll PR; Klein EA J Urol; 2007 Feb; 177(2):526-29; discussion 529-30. PubMed ID: 17222625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]