BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

804 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17499879)

  • 1. U(VI) adsorption on aquifer sediments at the Hanford Site.
    Um W; Serne RJ; Brown CF; Last GV
    J Contam Hydrol; 2007 Aug; 93(1-4):255-69. PubMed ID: 17499879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Surface complexation modeling of U(VI) adsorption by aquifer sediments from a former mill tailings site at Rifle, Colorado.
    Hyun SP; Fox PM; Davis JA; Campbell KM; Hayes KF; Long PE
    Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Dec; 43(24):9368-73. PubMed ID: 20000531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of uranyl-calcium-carbonato complexes on uranium(VI) adsorption to synthetic and natural sediments.
    Stewart BD; Mayes MA; Fendorf S
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Feb; 44(3):928-34. PubMed ID: 20058915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inhibition effect of secondary phosphate mineral precipitation on uranium release from contaminated sediments.
    Shi Z; Liu C; Zachara JM; Wang Z; Deng B
    Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Nov; 43(21):8344-9. PubMed ID: 19924967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Establishing a geochemical heterogeneity model for a contaminated vadose zone--aquifer system.
    Murray CJ; Zachara JM; McKinley JP; Ward A; Bott YJ; Draper K; Moore D
    J Contam Hydrol; 2013 Oct; 153():122-40. PubMed ID: 23664489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Linearity and reversibility of iodide adsorption on sediments from Hanford, Washington under water saturated conditions.
    Um W; Serne RJ; Krupka KM
    Water Res; 2004 Apr; 38(8):2009-16. PubMed ID: 15087181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biological and chemical interactions with U(VI) during anaerobic enrichment in the presence of iron oxide coated quartz.
    Lee BD; Walton MR; Megio JL
    Water Res; 2005 Nov; 39(18):4363-74. PubMed ID: 16236343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of gravel size fraction on the distribution coefficients of selected radionuclides.
    Um W; Serne RJ; Last GV; Clayton RE; Glossbrenner ET
    J Contam Hydrol; 2009 Jun; 107(1-2):82-90. PubMed ID: 19442406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Immobilization of U(VI) from oxic groundwater by Hanford 300 Area sediments and effects of Columbia River water.
    Ahmed B; Cao B; Mishra B; Boyanov MI; Kemner KM; Fredrickson JK; Beyenal H
    Water Res; 2012 Sep; 46(13):3989-98. PubMed ID: 22683408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Carbonate effects and pH-dependence of uranium sorption onto bacteriogenic iron oxides: kinetic and equilibrium studies.
    Katsoyiannis IA
    J Hazard Mater; 2007 Jan; 139(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 16839671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Carbonate effects on hexavalent uranium removal from water by nanocrystalline titanium dioxide.
    Wazne M; Meng X; Korfiatis GP; Christodoulatos C
    J Hazard Mater; 2006 Aug; 136(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 16352391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Method to attenuate U(VI) mobility in acidic waste plumes using humic acids.
    Wan J; Dong W; Tokunaga TK
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Mar; 45(6):2331-7. PubMed ID: 21319737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Identifying key controls on the behavior of an acidic-U(VI) plume in the Savannah River Site using reactive transport modeling.
    Bea SA; Wainwright H; Spycher N; Faybishenko B; Hubbard SS; Denham ME
    J Contam Hydrol; 2013 Aug; 151():34-54. PubMed ID: 23707874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Uranium removal from groundwater by natural clinoptilolite zeolite: effects of pH and initial feed concentration.
    Camacho LM; Deng S; Parra RR
    J Hazard Mater; 2010 Mar; 175(1-3):393-8. PubMed ID: 19892465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Uranium(VI) adsorption and surface complexation modeling onto background sediments from the F-Area Savannah River Site.
    Dong W; Tokunaga TK; Davis JA; Wan J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Feb; 46(3):1565-71. PubMed ID: 22191402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cesium migration in saturated silica sand and Hanford sediments as impacted by ionic strength.
    Flury M; Czigány S; Chen G; Harsh JB
    J Contam Hydrol; 2004 Jul; 71(1-4):111-26. PubMed ID: 15145564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An Assessment of U(VI) removal from groundwater using biochar produced from hydrothermal carbonization.
    Kumar S; Loganathan VA; Gupta RB; Barnett MO
    J Environ Manage; 2011 Oct; 92(10):2504-12. PubMed ID: 21665352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Study of sorption-retarded U(VI) diffusion in Hanford silt/clay material.
    Bai J; Liu C; Ball WP
    Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Oct; 43(20):7706-11. PubMed ID: 19921882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modeling in-situ uranium(VI) bioreduction by sulfate-reducing bacteria.
    Luo J; Weber FA; Cirpka OA; Wu WM; Nyman JL; Carley J; Jardine PM; Criddle CS; Kitanidis PK
    J Contam Hydrol; 2007 Jun; 92(1-2):129-48. PubMed ID: 17291626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Phosphate-Induced Immobilization of Uranium in Hanford Sediments.
    Pan Z; Giammar DE; Mehta V; Troyer LD; Catalano JG; Wang Z
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Dec; 50(24):13486-13494. PubMed ID: 27993066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 41.