213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17499914)
1. Optimizing shock wave lithotripsy in the 21st century.
Argyropoulos AN; Tolley DA
Eur Urol; 2007 Aug; 52(2):344-52. PubMed ID: 17499914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prediction of shockwave failure in patients with urinary tract stones.
Kim FJ; Rice KR
Curr Opin Urol; 2006 Mar; 16(2):88-92. PubMed ID: 16479210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ureteroscopic and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for rather large renal pelvis calculi.
Tavakkoli Tabasi K; Baghban Haghighi M
Urol J; 2007; 4(4):221-5. PubMed ID: 18270946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the effects of relationships between main spatial lower pole calyceal anatomic factors on the success of shock-wave lithotripsy in patients with lower pole kidney stones.
Sahinkanat T; Ekerbicer H; Onal B; Tansu N; Resim S; Citgez S; Oner A
Urology; 2008 May; 71(5):801-5. PubMed ID: 18279941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Inversion, hydration and diuresis during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: does it improve the stone-free rate for lower pole stone clearance?
Albanis S; Ather HM; Papatsoris AG; Masood J; Staios D; Sheikh T; Akhtar S; Buchholz N
Urol Int; 2009; 83(2):211-6. PubMed ID: 19752619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical predictors of stone fragmentation using slow-rate shock wave lithotripsy.
Li WM; Wu WJ; Chou YH; Liu CC; Wang CJ; Huang CH; Lee YC
Urol Int; 2007; 79(2):124-8. PubMed ID: 17851280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of outcome following lithotripsy.
Argyropoulos AN; Tolley DA
Curr Opin Urol; 2010 Mar; 20(2):154-8. PubMed ID: 19898239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Renal injury during shock wave lithotripsy is significantly reduced by slowing the rate of shock wave delivery.
Evan AP; McAteer JA; Connors BA; Blomgren PM; Lingeman JE
BJU Int; 2007 Sep; 100(3):624-7; discussion 627-8. PubMed ID: 17550415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A new transportable shock-wave lithotripsy machine for managing urinary stones: a single-centre experience with a dual-focus lithotripter.
De Sio M; Autorino R; Quarto G; Mordente S; Giugliano F; Di Giacomo F; Neri F; Quattrone C; Sorrentino D; De Domenico R; D'Armiento M
BJU Int; 2007 Nov; 100(5):1137-41. PubMed ID: 17550410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Single center, single operator comparative study of the effectiveness of electrohydraulic and electromagnetic lithotripters in the management of 10- to 20-mm single upper urinary tract calculi.
Jamshaid A; Ather MH; Hussain G; Khawaja KB
Urology; 2008 Nov; 72(5):991-5. PubMed ID: 18822451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi 1 cm or less.
Pearle MS; Lingeman JE; Leveillee R; Kuo R; Preminger GM; Nadler RB; Macaluso J; Monga M; Kumar U; Dushinski J; Albala DM; Wolf JS; Assimos D; Fabrizio M; Munch LC; Nakada SY; Auge B; Honey J; Ogan K; Pattaras J; McDougall EM; Averch TD; Turk T; Pietrow P; Watkins S
J Urol; 2008 May; 179(5 Suppl):S69-73. PubMed ID: 18405758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Shock wave lithotripsy versus semirigid ureteroscopy for proximal ureteral calculi (<20 mm): a comparative matched-pair study.
Youssef RF; El-Nahas AR; El-Assmy AM; El-Tabey NA; El-Hefnawy AS; Eraky I; El-Kenawy MR; El-Kappany HA; Sheir KZ
Urology; 2009 Jun; 73(6):1184-7. PubMed ID: 19362338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outcomes using a fourth-generation lithotripter: a new benchmark for comparison?
Nomikos MS; Sowter SJ; Tolley DA
BJU Int; 2007 Dec; 100(6):1356-60. PubMed ID: 17850387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of modification of shock-wave delivery on stone fragmentation.
Talic RF; Rabah DM
Curr Opin Urol; 2006 Mar; 16(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 16479209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Editorial comment on: Optimizing shock wave lithotripsy in the 21st century.
Geavlete P
Eur Urol; 2007 Aug; 52(2):352-3. PubMed ID: 17499911
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Treatment of steinstrasse by transureteral lithotripsy.
Rabbani SM
Urol J; 2008; 5(2):89-93. PubMed ID: 18592460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Transureteral lithotripsy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in management of upper ureteral calculi: a comparative study.
Nikoobakht MR; Emamzadeh A; Abedi AR; Moradi K; Mehrsai A
Urol J; 2007; 4(4):207-11. PubMed ID: 18270943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Shock wave lithotripsy for renal stones is not associated with hypertension and diabetes mellitus.
Sato Y; Tanda H; Kato S; Ohnishi S; Nakajima H; Nanbu A; Nitta T; Koroku M; Akagashi K; Hanzawa T
Urology; 2008 Apr; 71(4):586-91; discussion 591-2. PubMed ID: 18387387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimizing the fragmentation and clearance after shock wave lithotripsy.
Kekre NS; Kumar S
Curr Opin Urol; 2008 Mar; 18(2):205-9. PubMed ID: 18303545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [What is the current status of shock wave lithotripsy?].
Neisius A
Urologe A; 2017 Sep; 56(9):1147-1157. PubMed ID: 28766005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
