157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17502252)
1. Objectively measuring and comparing performance levels of diagnostic imaging systems and practices.
Gur D
Acad Radiol; 2007 Jun; 14(6):641-2. PubMed ID: 17502252
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of medical imaging systems and computer aids: a tutorial review.
Wagner RF; Metz CE; Campbell G
Acad Radiol; 2007 Jun; 14(6):723-48. PubMed ID: 17502262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of medical image processing in image-guided therapy.
Jannin P; Fitzpatrick JM; Hawkes DJ; Pennec X; Shahidi R; Vannier MW
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2002 Dec; 21(12):1445-9. PubMed ID: 12588028
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Acceptance testing.
Shearer DR
Radiol Manage; 1998; 20(3):22. PubMed ID: 10180221
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Imaging equipment manufacturers' websites: information at your fingertips?
Ozdoba C
Clin Neuroradiol; 2012 Sep; 22(3):275-7. PubMed ID: 22864687
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Gel dosimetry.
Morin RL; Ibbott GS
J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Feb; 3(2):144-6. PubMed ID: 17412026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Computer options open new radiology windows.
Jaffe CC; Lemke HU
Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1991 Sep; 13 Suppl():21-8. PubMed ID: 10150070
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of medical imaging and computer-assist systems: lessons from recent experience.
Wagner RF; Beiden SV; Campbell G; Metz CE; Sacks WM
Acad Radiol; 2002 Nov; 9(11):1264-77. PubMed ID: 12449359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [New methods of information technology for designing ultrasound diagnostic devices].
Trukhanov AI; Kudriavtsev PS
Med Tekh; 1994; (3):14-6. PubMed ID: 7934725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Imaging technology and practice assessments: diagnostic performance, clinical relevance, and generalizability in a changing environment.
Gur D
Radiology; 2004 Nov; 233(2):309-12. PubMed ID: 15516611
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Medical imaging 2095.
Strauss J; Horii S
Adm Radiol; 1995 Aug; 14(8):41-3. PubMed ID: 10151505
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Y2K compliance report. Problems affecting imaging equipment.
Health Devices; 1999 Sep; 28(9):366-8. PubMed ID: 10489646
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Reader studies for validation of CAD systems.
Gallas BD; Brown DG
Neural Netw; 2008; 21(2-3):387-97. PubMed ID: 18215501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Introduction: health technology assessment in diagnostic imaging.
Carlos RC; Goeree R
J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 May; 6(5):297-8. PubMed ID: 19394569
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Blood gas/pH analyzers.
Health Devices; 1995 Dec; 24(12):498-501. PubMed ID: 8789633
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Toward consistent use of reporting scales in imaging studies.
Wagner RF
Acad Radiol; 2008 Feb; 15(2):137-8. PubMed ID: 18206612
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The changing face of health technology assessment.
Hillman BJ
J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 May; 6(5):289. PubMed ID: 19394565
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Design of evaluations of imaging technologies: development of a paradigm.
Gatsonis C
Acad Radiol; 2000 Sep; 7(9):681-3. PubMed ID: 10987328
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Toward a strategy for consensus development on a quantitative approach to medical imaging.
Wagner RF
Acad Radiol; 2006 Feb; 13(2):137-9. PubMed ID: 16428047
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Imaging technology and practice assessment studies: importance of the baseline or reference performance level.
Gur D
Radiology; 2008 Apr; 247(1):8-11. PubMed ID: 18372460
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
