BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17502252)

  • 21. The clinical efficacy of diagnostic imaging evaluation studies. Problems, paradigms, and prescriptions.
    Goin JE; Hermann GA
    Invest Radiol; 1991 May; 26(5):507-11. PubMed ID: 2055751
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. One size (doesn't) fit all.
    Reiner B
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2008 Apr; 5(4):567-70. PubMed ID: 18359444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evidence-based radiology: step 1--ask.
    Kelly AM
    Semin Roentgenol; 2009 Jul; 44(3):140-6. PubMed ID: 19480896
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Point-of-care technology: the i-STAT system for bedside blood analysis.
    Adams DA; Buus-Frank M
    J Pediatr Nurs; 1995 Jun; 10(3):194-8. PubMed ID: 7629708
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Indexes for three-class classification performance assessment--an empirical comparison.
    Sampat MP; Patel AC; Wang Y; Gupta S; Kan CW; Bovik AC; Markey MK
    IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2009 May; 13(3):300-12. PubMed ID: 19171528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Delft conference proceedings editorial 2008: safety and efficacy for new techniques and imaging using new equipment to support European legislation.
    Faulkner K; Zoetelief J; Schultz FW; Guest R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):1-2. PubMed ID: 18556783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Electroencephalographs.
    Dondelinger RM
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 2009; 43(5):388-91. PubMed ID: 19842771
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Example of organizing a middle-size business in medical industry].
    Ziuzina LM
    Med Tekh; 1994; (1):31-4. PubMed ID: 8208086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. ROC volumes--should they be used?
    McClish DK
    Biom J; 2007 Aug; 49(5):665-6; discussion 670-1. PubMed ID: 17926322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Study design in the evaluation of breast cancer imaging technologies.
    Houn F; Bright RA; Bushar HF; Croft BY; Finder CA; Gohagan JK; Jennings RJ; Keegan P; Kessler LG; Kramer BS; Martynec LO; Robinowitz M; Sacks WM; Schultz DG; Wagner RF
    Acad Radiol; 2000 Sep; 7(9):684-92. PubMed ID: 10987329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Experimental technology lurks at radiology's edge.
    Sandrick K
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1998 Feb; 20(2):49-51, 53-4, 67. PubMed ID: 10187444
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A review of cranial imaging techniques: potential and limitations.
    Fahlbusch R; Samii A
    Clin Neurosurg; 2007; 54():100-4. PubMed ID: 18504904
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluating evaluations of medical diagnostic systems.
    Miller RA
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 1996; 3(6):429-31. PubMed ID: 8930859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of a computer-based system for plus disease diagnosis in retinopathy of prematurity.
    Koreen S; Gelman R; Martinez-Perez ME; Jiang L; Berrocal AM; Hess DJ; Flynn JT; Chiang MF
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Dec; 114(12):e59-67. PubMed ID: 18054630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Selecting silicone tubing for device applications.
    Jahn D
    Med Device Technol; 2005 Oct; 16(8):12-3. PubMed ID: 16355963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Health technology assessment: a review of international activity and examples of approaches with computed tomographic colonography.
    Husereau D; Morrison A; Battista R; Goeree R
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 May; 6(5):343-52. PubMed ID: 19394575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Health technology assessment for radiologists: basic principles and evaluation framework.
    Lim ME; O'Reilly D; Tarride JE; Burke N; Ferrusi IL; Campbell K; Goeree R
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 May; 6(5):299-306. PubMed ID: 19394570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The future of molecular imaging in the clinic needs a clear strategy and a multidisciplinary effort.
    Schäfers M
    Basic Res Cardiol; 2008 Mar; 103(2):200-2. PubMed ID: 18324376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Diagnostic and therapeutic impact of MRI.
    Miles K
    Clin Radiol; 2002 Mar; 57(3):231-2. PubMed ID: 11952321
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Methodologic Guide for Evaluating Clinical Performance and Effect of Artificial Intelligence Technology for Medical Diagnosis and Prediction.
    Park SH; Han K
    Radiology; 2018 Mar; 286(3):800-809. PubMed ID: 29309734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.