22 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17502258)
1. Factors affecting increasing radiation dose for mammography in North Carolina from 1997 through 2001: an analysis of Food and Drug Administration annual surveys.
Pisano ED; Chiu YF; Ni L; Li Y; Britt GG; Johnson RE; Burns B; Cole E; Kuzmiak C; Koomen M; Pavic D
Acad Radiol; 2004 May; 11(5):536-43. PubMed ID: 15147618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Has the mammography quality standards act affected the mammography quality in North Carolina?
Pisano ED; Schell M; Rollins J; Burns CB; Hall B; Lin Y; Braeuning MP; Burke E; Holliday J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Apr; 174(4):1089-91. PubMed ID: 10749257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. MQSA (Mammography Quality Standards Act) update--focusing on quality assurance.
Butler PF
Radiol Manage; 1998; 20(4):40-50. PubMed ID: 10181471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mammography "dose creep": causes and solutions.
Seibert JA
Acad Radiol; 2004 May; 11(5):487-8. PubMed ID: 15147612
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The negative impact of MQSA (Mammography Quality Standards Act) on rural mammography programs.
Inman M
Radiol Manage; 1998; 20(4):31-9. PubMed ID: 10181470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The mammography audit: a primer for the mammography quality standards act (MQSA).
Linver MN; Osuch JR; Brenner RJ; Smith RA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Jul; 165(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 7785586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mammography improves under MQSA oversight.
Elliott ML; Houn F
Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1998 Jun; 20(6):37-8. PubMed ID: 10180982
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Reported drop in mammography : is this cause for concern?
Breen N; A Cronin K; Meissner HI; Taplin SH; Tangka FK; Tiro JA; McNeel TS
Cancer; 2007 Jun; 109(12):2405-9. PubMed ID: 17503429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Factors affecting decreasing radiation dose for mammography in North Carolina after 2002: an analysis of Food and Drug Administration annual surveys.
Kuzmiak CM; Pisano ED; Chung Y; Britt GG; Burns B; Cole E
Acad Radiol; 2007 Jun; 14(6):685-91. PubMed ID: 17502258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Legislative and regulatory mandates for mammography quality assurance.
Fintor L; Alciati MH; Fischer R
J Public Health Policy; 1995; 16(1):81-107. PubMed ID: 7738160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
